---------------------------------------------------------
Zulhijja 1, 1425/January 12, 2005 #4
---------------------------------------------------------
Scroll down 
to Excellent report on 
Israel 
Firster, Senator 
Lieberman, 
prime mover in the war on 
Iraq.
-----------------------------------------------
Eid 
al-Adha 2005 is on Jan. 21, 2005
The 
Islamic 
Proof. Do not be a blind follower or a nationalist.
[from Dr. Omar Afzal, Ithaca, new York]
Please note and inform your local Imam
D. Hijjah crescent moon was NOT SEEN in N. American on Monday, 
Jan. 10, 2005 evening. Insha-Allah it will be seen everywhere on 
Tuesday, and Eid al-Adha in the USA and 
Canada 
(like most other countries in the world) is on Friday, Jan. 21, 2005
In Makkah Mukarramah, the moon set two minutes BEFORE the sunset on 
Jan. 10, 2005. Nobody could see a crescent moon in Saudi 
Arabia 
or anywhere in world on Jan. 10, 2005.
Eid al-Adha or Eid al-Hajj? 
ISNA 
Fiqh Council and some others have been enforcing a BID'AH on the 
Muslims in N. America. No Fiqh ever said that Eid al-Adha is 
actually Eid al-Hajj. 
There is no Daleel in the 
Quran 
or the Sunnah that Muslim must fast on the Day of Arafah in 
Makkah 
(determined by the official Saudi Hajj date, even if it is always wrong).
Muslims everywhere in the world always celebrate it on the 10th D. Hijja.
ISNA asks you to celebrate Eid al-Adha on the 9th day of D. Hijja. 
Qur'an: (The Crescent moons) are the Mawaqeet and for (determining 
the date of) Hajj. (2:189).
The only correct date of Eid al-Adha all over the world is 10th Day of 
D. Hijja, counted from the evening D. Hijja Hilaal is seen where you 
live, and NOT when Saudis say they saw it. (It is well-known that 
NONE of the 6 official committees in S. Arabia ever see the Hilal 
on the officially announced dates.
It is always SEEN in S. Arabia a day later.)
Hadith: 
Eid al-Adha is on the 10th day of Dhul-Hijja. (Hilal 
D. Hijja al-Fitr. (Fath al-Bari ))
All Ahadith mention only the 10th as the day of Eid al-Adha. 
(No Hadith mentions: the day after Hajj or Eid al-Adha as a 
celebration of Hajj.)
If Eid al-Adha is a celebration of the completion of Hajj then why 
do the Hujjaj NOT pray Eid; and why did the Messenger (S) pray it 
regularly in Medina for 9 years when there was no Hajj for the Muslims?
Fiqh: Eid al-Adha date, like Eid al-Fitr, must be fixed by the 
crescent moon.
- 
Eid prayer on the 9th day of D. Hijja is meaningless.
 
- 
A Sacrifice on 9th does not fulfill your obligatory (Wajib) sacrifice of 
Eid al-Adha.
 
----------------------------------------------
Palestine! 
O Palestine! [Confirmation of 
New Trend 
Report.]
New Trend's expert on Palestine stated quite clearly that the election 
of Abbas [Abu Mazen] was bogus. He was elected by Israel and the U.S.A., 
not by the Palestinian people who are under military occupation. Such 
an election is a fraud and is null and void both under international law 
and under Islamic law. It points to the kind of election planned for 
Iraq on January 30.
Reports in a variety of smaller American newspapers confirm our report. 
In its January 8 report, the Daily Press of Newport News, Virginia 
stated that "... Israeli authorities allowed Abbas to move freely 
between the West Bank and Gaza Strip while other candidates were 
blocked" according to a candidate from Fatah itself. 
On January 11, the news ticker under 
MSNBC 
reported that 200,000 Palestinians living in East Jerusalem were not 
allowed to vote. The Dallas Morning News, from which the Daily Press 
picked up its report, quoted a Jerusalem man in the street as saying: 
"It doesn't matter whom you vote for. Whoever the United States has 
chosen, he will win."
While the mainstream TV channels were trumpeting the story of the 
"fair elections" held in occupied Palestine, on January 11 Israeli 
tanks once again entered Gaza and started the process of murder 
and mayhem. The 
Zionist-controlled 
media 
here did not even discuss it.
CARTER'S SIMPLICITY: Former President Carter endorsed the Israeli 
claim that it was a fair election. Mr. Carter simply looked at the 
voting at the polling booths. He did not see the cities under 
occupation. He also ignored the murder of the entire Palestinian 
leadership by the Israelis before the elections.
On January 11, SHARON CALLED ABBAS TO CONGRATULATE him on his 
ELECTION victory. The same Sharon refused to talk to Arafat for 
SEVERAL YEARS while holding him under house arrest under TANK GUN POINT.
---------------------------------------------------------
FISHY VISIT
The month before the bogus elections in Palestine, the President of 
the World Bank, a Jew named Wolfesohen [something like that], 
visited Sharon in occupied Palestine ["israel"] and assured him 
of full financial support for the coming "reconstruction."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gonzalez Claims He and President 
Bush 
do not Endorse Torture
January 6, 2005. Mr. Gonzalez , President Bush's new nominee for 
Attorney General underwent a hearing but was tossed so many softballs 
by the Democrats that he managed wriggle through the most embarrassing 
situations including the exposure of a secret memo in which he 
used code language for the endorsement of torture.
Critics say that Gonzalez was the real muscle man behind Ashcroft's 
terror campaign against Muslims. However, in the hearing Gonzalez 
claimed that neither President Bush nor he have 
ever supported the use of torture.
The hearing was shadowy, like something out of Kafka or Orwell with 
magnificent use of double talk. It appears that if a man is TIED UP IN 
a FETAL POSITION 24 hours at a time, he is not being tortured. Also, he 
or she can be kept awake days at a time [being forced to stay awake] and 
that's not torture either.
Gonzalez believes that if the vital organs are not damaged, then the 
prisoner is not being tortured. One Senator said during the hearing 
that the Saudis had shown him one prisoner whose fingers had been 
broken joint by joint. That too does not count as torture because no 
vital organs are damaged!
[Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat from Vermont, shed some interesting 
light on Police Commissioner Kerik, Bush's previous nominee who had 
suddenly resigned. Leahy stated that the real problem with Kerik was 
not a non-immigrant nanny, as he had claimed in his scramble to resign, 
but a "sex house" he had in 9.11-hurt city of New York. When, according 
to Leahy, Kerik found that his secret had been discovered, he brought 
up the nanny story to resign.]
[Observers ask, how many kinky secrets is the Bush Administration 
hiding? Rudy Guiliani, Bush's great New York friend, called "jew"liani 
by New Yorkers, who recommended Kerik, blatantly kept a mistress and 
kicked out his wife.]
Gonzalez' claim that he and Bush do not practice torture is negated by 
independent observers, including the International Committee of the 
Red Cross 
and amnesty International, as well as the victims, such as British 
Muslims who have been returned to their homes and revealed the shocking 
situation in Guantanamo Bay [which was first condemned by New Trend.]
Aby Ghraib is being presented to the American public as if it was only 
the doing of a few bored junior officers who played around with their 
Iraqi victims. All independent reports indicated that Abu Ghraib was 
sanctioned all the way from the top, at least from the General, 
including General Sanchez who resigned and was quickly faded out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. 
reports from our 
Media 
Monitor.
When an 
African 
American Man Supports Bush: Armstrong Williams' $240 Million Secret
A massive majority of African Americans [Black Americans] opposes Bush. 
Why would an African American support an administration which is 
perceived as racist, based on White Supremacist ideas, and backed by 
racists like Limbaugh, Pat Robertson and Falwell?
The answer is: Greed!
Armstrong Williams speaks out strongly in support of Bush. In his 
writings syndicated across the country, he advocated the Bush 
administration's "No Child Left Behind" educational program
Now it appears that Williams received $240 million from the 
administration, directly or indirectly. He has been exposed as 
a person who claimed to be a journalist but turned out to be a 
PR person working for money.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THREE DAYS OF CURFEW IN GILGIT. On January 8, 9 and 10 there was 24 
hour curfew in Gilgit. Rioting erupted after gunmen attacked Shia 
leader Agha Ziaudiin Musawi. His driver and guard were killed and 
he was wounded. An attacker was also killed. After that the Shia 
community, very strong in Gilgit, took up arms and attacked 
various government facilities. The Shias attacked the hospital 
and shot dead Sher Wali Khan, the Director of Health, and wounded 
a number of doctors. Six members of one family as well as a 12 year 
old child were killed. [Source daily Khabrain, Urdu language.]
--------------------------------------------------------------
MUSHARRAF ASSAILANT ESCAPES:
January 12. Islamabad. The Musharraf government finally confirmed 
news that Mushtaq Ahmed, accused in the attempt to kill General 
Musharraf, escaped during the New Year holidays from a maximum 
security prison. A number of prison operatives including a high 
officer have been arrested to investigate a possible conspiracy.
[Source: Daily Jasarat, Urdu language.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTACK ON SUI GAS CENTRAL FACILITY:
Baluch rebels attacked the central gas pumping facility in Sui, 
Baluchistan province of Pakistan. Two security guards were killed 
and 5 injured in the attack. The facility remained temporarily in 
control of the rebels before Pakistani troops counterattacked and 
retook the facility. The supply of gas was temporarily cut off.
[General Musharraf has pledged to crush the Baluch rebels but the 
rebellion seems to be spreading.] [Sources: various Urdu papers.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Islamic 
Women 
vs Secular Women
January 11. A conference called "Beijing 10+" held in Islamabad by 
the UNDP indicated that secular forces are getting 7 million dollars 
to carry out their agenda in Pakistan among women.
The meeting was disrupted by Islamic women, led by Samia Raheel Qazi, 
Dr. Farida Ahmed and and Jameelah Ahmed. They walked out of the 
conference and tore up posters put up in the conference against the 
Hudood Ordinance [Islamic Laws against adultery etc]. The Islamic 
women gave a statement to news men which says: "we reject an agenda 
for Pakistani women imported from the West. We oppose family planning 
and sex education in school syllabus for little chilodren" [Source, 
daily Ausaf, Urdu language.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Israel First, Sen. Lieberman & the Republic
by William Hughes
On Jan. 2, 2005, with respect to Iraq, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-CT) 
predicted, that the phony election now being rigged for that country 
would be successful and that the resistance there doesn't have any 
"popular support." Since he made his patently deceptive remarks, 
the governor of Baghdad was assassinated and 21 more U.S. troops 
have died in combat 
(http://icasualtiesorg/oif).
Lieberman has also just recently met with Ariel Sharon, who wants the 
U.S. to attack 
Iran, 
the day after the Iraqi War ends 
(
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-469972,00.html
). 
Sharon is the same unhinged Zionist, who boasted, in Jerusalem, on 
Oct. 03, 2001, "We control America" 
(
http://www.wrmea.com/html/newsitem_s.htm
).
Who is Sen. Lieberman? One can say, without fear of contradiction, 
that he is a rabid Iraqi War Hawk. He is also a promoter of draconian 
laws: like the U.S. Patriot Act, Homeland Security and the Intelligence 
Agencies Reform Act, that have and will curtail the rights of every 
Americans. But if we wanted to know who Lieberman "really" is, - the 
larger, hidden truth - we can look through the writings of Dale 
Peter Scott and his thesis on DEEP POLITICS? Scott says, "DEEP 
POLITICS are all those political practices and arrangements...which 
are usually repressed rather than acknowledged... Conspiracies are 
part of our political structures, not exceptions to it."
As an example of DEEP POLITICS, let's go back to Nov. 24, 1963, and 
the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald by one Jack Ruby. The Warren 
Commission, (which was into government damage control, just like today's 
9/11 Commission), falsely portrayed both men "as loners," and insisted 
Ruby had "no organized crime" connections. In DEEP POLITICS AND THE 
DEATH OF JFK, Scott reveals the truth. Ruby was a member of the 
Meyer Lansky Crime Syndicate. He was into dealing drugs, gambling 
and political corruption. Like Oswald, he was an FBI informer. Ruby 
received protected status from the Feds for being an informer, the same 
as Boston's mobster and snitch, James "Whitey" Bulger 
(
http://www.boston.com/news/packages/whitey
).
Scott also suspects that, back then, the FBI's primary institutional 
goal wasn't the prosecution of crime, "but the surveillance and 
repression of political dissent." His book also touches on other 
fairly recent examples of wrongdoings connected to the M.O. of 
DEEP POLITICS, like: Contragate; COINTELPRO; Watergate; the 
CIA 
plot to murder Cuba's Fidel Castro; the killing of Black Panther, 
Fred Hampton; and the framing of Leonard Peltier. The author delves 
into the symbiotic relationship that then existed between crime 
syndicates, a complicit 
media, 
corporations, intelligence agencies, governments, politicians, unions, 
drug dealers, the FBI and other groups. His book didn't try to answer 
the question of who killed JFK, rather it wisely examines, "How 
could American institutions harbor and protect such evil?" All we 
now know for sure is that after the assassinations of JFK, his brother 
Robert, and Martin Luther King, Jr., a power vacuum was created. 
Today, unfortunately, it has been filled by the likes of the 
jingoistic Bush-Cheney Gang, a mostly craven Congress and the 
scheming Neocons.
Fast forward to the key question: "Who is Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman?" 
Based on Scott's books and well documented views on DEEP POLITICS, 
and what I know and can reasonably infer and speculate on about 
this cunning politician, I believe that Lieberman is an Israel Firster, 
who is embedded in the Zionist Movement juggernaut itself. The phrase, 
"Israel Firster," is used here to represent an individual, who puts 
Israel's interests before the interests of the American Republic. 
Dr. Alfred M. Lilenthal, an expert on Zionism and the Israel Firster 
phenomena, labeled America's Iago, Henry Kissinger, as the 
"original Israel Firster" 
(
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com
), 
if that is true, then Lieberman can't be far behind. As for Zionism, 
it has been defined as a political cause, international in scope, with 
a "greater state of Israel" as one of its goals 
(
http://www.wbaifree.org/takingaim/hhz/ch01.htm
).
What does the public record show? If a UN Security Council Resolution 
condemns Israel on Monday, Lieberman will have a Congressional 
"Resolution" ready on Tuesday to offset it. The U.S. could go broke, 
too, giving our money away to Israel - try over $138 billion in cost 
to the taxpayers since 1948 - and Lieberman would come up with yet 
another scheme to extract billions of dollars more from our treasury 
to serve the interests of the Zionists Cabal 
(
http://wrmea.com/us_aid_to_israel/index.htm
). 
If another repulsive traitor, like Jonathan Pollard, gets caught 
stealing our military secrets on Israel's behalf, Lieberman will 
be sure to play it down. Israeli bulldozer operators could run over 
and kill a hundred American-born activists, like 
Rachel Corrie, 
and you would never hear a peep of protest coming from Lieberman. 
Zionist Israel could also continue to make millions more enemies in 
the Muslim World for America by its brutal treatment of the Palestinian 
people and Lieberman wouldn't lose any sleep over it. And, when the 
matter of the USS Liberty is brought up, you can also count on him to 
give a deaf ear to any pleas for justice and the truth on behalf of 
the survivors of that deliberate and murderous Israeli attack 
(
http://www.ussliberty.org
).
Nevertheless, it's important to underscore that not all Zionists are 
Israel Firsters and not all Jews support Zionism 
(
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com
). 
In fact, many Jews, like the highly respected Rabbi Yisrael David Weiss, 
whom I have had the privilege of interviewing in Washington, D.C., 
(
http://homepage.mac.com/bhughes2/iMovieTheater97.html
), 
are outspoken critics of Zionism. They consider it "a heresy," as 
the "antithesis of Torah Judaism," and, worse, they say it encourages 
"dual loyalism" 
(
http://www.nkusa.org/index.cfm
).
Remember, too, that it was Lieberman who derailed, the then-hopeful 
presidential Democratic primary candidacy of Howard Dean, in 2003, 
because he had dared to urge that the U.S. adopt an "evenhanded policy" 
in the Middle East. And, don't expect Lieberman, a knee jerk defender 
of the Apartheid Wall, in Occupied Israel, to look into the suspicious 
activities of those so-called "Israeli Art Students" 
(
http://antiwar.com/israeli-files.php
) 
and, particularly, those five Zionists who got caught cheer leading 
and videotaping, on 
9/11, 
over in New Jersey, while the World Trade Centers were imploding and 
thousands of Americans were dying from that highly suspicious disaster 
(
http://ww1.sundayherald.com/37707
). 
Why were those creeps acting like they "knew" the WTC was going to 
be attacked?
Our Republic, sourced by the blood of our Revolutionary War patriots, 
promotes "the general welfare" of all the people. While on the other 
hand, the elitist Zionist Movement, led by the likes of Sharon, is 
inherently undemocratic. It exalts "only" one race 
(
http://www.israelshamir.net
). 
Keep in mind also that America didn't have any enemies in the 
Islamic World prior to the creation of Israel. If this noxious 
Israel First ethos, via Lieberman's divided and twisted psyche, 
is permitted to continue to influence the policies of our country, 
it will, like a cancer, unless stopped, eat away at the vitals of 
our Republic.
© William Hughes 2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
click here to email
 
a link to this 
article
2005-01-12 Wed 18:47ct
NewTrendMag.org