Ramadan 
5, 1425/ October 20, 2004             #103
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scroll down to independent report on how ISNA, a Washington-supported group, 
misled Muslims on Ramadan.
-------------------------------------------------
NATIONALISM vs 
ISLAM
[During Ramadan, 
New Trend 
will offer its readers excerpts from the writings of 
Allama Iqbal, Syed Qutb, Mohommed Ali Jinnah,  Abul 'Ala Maudoodi, 
Ali Shariati, 
Dr. Omar 'Abdel Rahman 
and others. We begin with Iqbal.]
Original in Urdu language:
"In taza khudaun main burra sub say watan hay 
jo pairhan iss ka hay, woh muzhab ka kafan hay
yeh boot keh tarashida-e-tehzeebe nawi hay
gharat gur-e-kashana-e-nabawwi hay
bazoo tra tawheed ki quwwat say qawi hay
Islam tra daes hay, too Mustafwi hay
 
Nazara-e-dairina zamanay ko dikha day
Aye Mustafwi, khak main iss buut ko mila day!"
[Translation:
"Of these new 'gods’, the biggest is nationalism
That garb which it uses to dress up in, is the funeral cloth of religion
This idol hewn and sculpted by the new civilization
Desecrates and destroys the abode of the Prophet.
[O Muslim] Your strength lies in the power of Tawheed
Your country is ISLAM. Your nationality is MUSTAFWI.
Show the world the glory of the ancient vision
O Mustafwi, smash this idol and reduce it to dust."
[From Iqbal’s poem titled "wataniat" (nationalism) in the collection 
titled Baang-e-dara.]
 ----------------------------------------
Strategic Studies
[CAIR 
or SCARE?]
Victim Status, Protected Minority? What’s Wrong with the 
CAIR/ISNA’s 
Plans for the 
Muslims of America?
By 
Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D
"Is it not to Allah that sincere devotion is due? But those who take 
for friends and guardians others than Allah say: 'We only serve them 
in order that they may bring us nearer to Allah.’Truly Allah will 
judge between them in that wherein they differ. But Allah guides not 
such as are false and ungrateful." 
[The Qur’an 39:3]
In a country of 260 million, not one Muslim has been killed and only 
a handful have been injured by the 
American 
people after 
9.11. 
A few people were also killed in armed robberies or inner city murders 
and these are sometimes dubiously linked to post-9.11 violence. A few 
mosques have been attacked, but these have usually been random acts of 
vandalism by a few thoughtless youths. The mosques attacked were 
deserted at the time of attack and were owned by rich communities 
with little or no support among their neighbors. More than a 1,000 
mosques flourish in America.
Considering the daily barrage of concealed and open propaganda against 
Islam on TV and radio, the 
"hate Islam" 
project has failed miserably. 
The enemies of Islam have spent billions to incite the American people 
against Muslims. The results have been meager. If the American people had 
taken the propaganda to heart, not one Mosque could have continued to 
function.
In fact the American people have embraced Islam in growing numbers 
after 9.11. The 
media 
have inadvertently introduced Islam to masses of Americans as no amount 
of Muslim effort could have done. Even the totally negative publicity 
has created a great urge to know Islam.
In that context, the role of CAIR, an offshoot of ISNA 
[Islamic Society of North America], has been extremely harmful for 
the Muslims of America. CAIR has done damage in a number of ways:
- 
It has worked steadily to create the impression that Muslims are a 
"minority" and the rights of this "minority" are under attack.
 
- 
CAIR pretends that the American people hate Muslims and are 
constantly attacking Islam and Muslims. Like the Jewish 
ADL, 
CAIR lists every little offense against Muslims which takes place 
anywhere in this huge country.
 
- 
It would seem from CAIR’s output that Muslims are in America are 
victims or potential victims.
 
- 
CAIR’s self-serving publicity flies in the face of American realities. 
There is very little religious bigotry here among the masses of 
American people. Anyone who has traveled by air within the 
United States will have seen SOMALI WOMEN in hijab working in 
America’s airports [supposedly the places most sensitive in the 
list of targets of terrorism.].
 
- 
The net result of CAIR’s efforts is that America’s Muslims, 
especially immigrants, are scared to death and think that they may 
be subjected to atrocities at any time.
 
- 
Islam under CAIR has become a defensive project, with constant whining 
and fawning going on, about how good Muslims are, and how all they want 
to do is to pray, fast, give zakat and go for Hajj. Discussion of 
Jihad 
and support for Muslims in 
Palestine, 
Kashmir, 
Chechnia, 
Sudan, 
Iran, 
Afghanistan 
and 
Iraq 
is no longer permitted in ISNA/CAIR gatherings.
 
- 
Hypocrisy is typical of Muslims connected to CAIR. They make an 
ongoing effort to show that like America’s rulers, they too believe 
that Muslims fighting anywhere in the world are terrorists and we 
have nothing to do with them and cannot even talk about them.
 
THE DETERIORATION OF MOSQUES: CAIR’s ROLE
One would expect that as civil rights cases come up in a certain area, 
the mosque community in that area would mobilize Muslim support, 
reach out to the 
media, 
hire attorneys and make sure the rights of the alleged offenders are 
safeguarded.
Such mobilization would increase the autonomy of each mosque and help 
to create self-dependence. Instead we see CAIR working to centralize 
control of all such issues. When something happens, however minor, 
the mosques are encouraged to rush to CAIR for help instead of 
carrying out a local solution. Thus DEPENDENCE and HELPLESSNESS are 
becoming characteristics of many mosques.
THE REAL ISSUE in AMERICA: GOVERNMENT OPPRESSION
CAIR tries, often successfully, to divert American Muslims from 
the reality that Muslims are being oppressed by the government, not 
by the people of America. Where the government has to be faced, 
CAIR is either silent or actually sides with the government.
- 
In the case of the blind Shaikh, Dr. Omar 'Abdel Rahman, CAIR sided 
with the government.
 
- 
In the case of 
Imam Jamil al-Amin, 
CAIR sided with the government.
 
- 
In the case of 'Ahmed 'Abdel Sattar, CAIR has turned Ahmed into a 
non-person, even ignoring his wife's letters.
 
- 
In the case of two naive Muslims from Albany, New York, CAIR claimed 
that the activities of the Muslims were troubling. [And so on down 
the list.]
 
- 
CAIR has recognized 
Israel, 
and the legitimacy of Israel appears as an assumption in CAIR publicity.
 
SINISTER ASPECTS OF CAIR:
For years, 
Zionist 
Jews like Emerson and Pipes have been telling the American government 
that CAIR and associates are supporters of Islamic movements in 
Palestine . The government has ignored the Zionist attacks. It 
would appear that the government considers CAIR what CAIR appears to 
be: an outlet for government propaganda into the Muslim community.
CAIR Directors seem to have high security clearance when most 
other Muslims are suspect.
CAIR Directors do not reveal their salaries. In recent years there 
have been indications that CAIR has received funding from Saudi 
Arabia 
[evidently with the approval of the U.S. government].
CAIR has not presented the funding facts even to its own supporters 
and has not discussed the legitimacy of such funding.
At key points in Muslim activities, CAIR takes a very defensive posture 
on events in the Muslim world, though it is not necessary for it to do 
so, to the extent of commenting on sectarian violence in 
Pakistan.
Only a few days back, CAIR endorsed ISNA’s move to start the month of 
Ramadan in a fashion which violated the Sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh) 
and was based on "evidence" which could not stand scrutiny.
I urge CAIR to disband itself and save the Muslims of America from 
seeing themselves as victims and a minority. Islam has come to America 
to establish justice and truth: not to become a minority.
--------------------------------------------------------
CHE GUEVARA's DAUGHTER FEARS U.S. INVASION OF CUBA: 
CONDEMNS U.S. ROLE in IRAQ
[a few excerpts from The Independent of London.]
Aleida Guevara, the daughter of the legendary revolutionary Che Guevara, 
was in London to speak about the growing threat of US military 
aggression against Cuba.
Bumper stickers across Florida proclaim "Iraq today, Cuba tomorrow". 
In the lead-up to the elections President George 
Bush 
cannot afford to ignore the vocal anti-Castro American Cuban vote 
in Florida. Jeb Bush, his brother and state Governor, has said: 
"After its success in Iraq, Washington should finish with the regime 
of Castro."
This, Dr Guevara insisted at the third European Social Forum held 
in London's Alexandra Palace yesterday, was more than rhetoric. In May 
the Bush administration issued a dossier by the Commission For 
Assistance to a Free Cuba, dedicated $59m (£33m) to regime change 
and sanctioned the use of planes broadcasting propaganda just 
outside Cuban airspace.
The dossier, the Cuban Solidarity Campaign said yesterday, does not 
speak of peaceful regime change but of military action. The Cubans 
have responded by placing their armed forces on high alert. Dr Guevara 
said: "If it was not such a serious threat, I would find it funny. 
The things he [Mr Bush] is saying are so silly and unbelievable. 
In that dossier it says that when they take power in Cuba they are 
going to vaccinate every child under five when in reality we are the 
ones who could give the US vaccinations. If it was not for the fact 
that the threat is so real and the evidence is there in Iraq, we 
would find it funny."
The fact the blockade which has blighted Cuba for 44 years has been 
tightened, angers Dr Guevara. Only recently she battled to get 
medicine from the US for a 
four-year-old boy with meningitis. 
He died before they smuggled it into Cuba.
Dr Guevara asked Britons to prevent her country becoming another Iraq. 
"[Iraq] is one of the greatest crimes being committed at the moment. 
It is quite embarrassing for humanity that this sort of thing is 
going on. I would say to British society they cannot be complicit in 
this war. They have got to call a stop to it."
---------------------------------------------------------------
[The rebel view of the situation in Darfur, Sudan is being published 
here for information only, not for endorsement.]
Dafur Leaders Speak on Eri-TV; Genocide, 
Ethnic Cleansing by Bashir Regime Charged
by Thomas C. Mountain [Hawaii, USA]
Three internationaly accredited leaders of the Dafur and Sudanese 
peoples movements were interviewed in depth in the first of a two 
part program on Eritrean television (Eri-TV) on Friday, Oct. 8, 2004. 
The Dafur leaders, who have been recognized as representing the 
Dafur peoples by both the Sudanese government and 
African 
and Arab governments for the Sudanese peace negotiations organized to 
take place in Cairo, included representatives from the Sudan Liberation 
Movement (SLM), the Sudan Peace and Liberation Movement (SPLM), as well 
as a representative of the Sudanese National Democratic Alliance (NDA).
All of the speakers agreed that ethnic cleansing and genocide have 
been, and continue to be carried out in Dafur by the National Islamic 
Front (NIF) government headed by President Bashir in Sudan.  Dr. 
Sharif Harir spoke on behalf of the SLM, Mr. Idris Ibrahim Azraq spoke 
on behalf of the SPLM and Dr. Elsharif Khedir represented the NDA.
The program opened with an overview of the history of the problems 
in Dafur, with both representatives of the Dafur movements using the 
word "marginalized" to describe the actions of the Khartoum 
government historicaly in Dafur since Sudanese independence in the 
mid 1950's. They pointed out that little in the way of investment was 
made in the region by the Sudanese government and that this led to 
protests and other actions by the people of Dafur. While agreeing that 
the policy of the Sudanese government under the NIF of Bashir was 
based on genocide and ethnic cleansing in southern Sudan for the 
past twenty years or more, this policy was not implemented until 
more recently in Dafur, according to the Dafur representatives.
Dr. Harir spoke at length on the history of Dafur and how 
historically Dafur was an independent entity, in effect an African 
Kingdom for centuries, until finally overcome by overwhelming British 
military might in 1917 and subsequently incorporated into the 
British colony of Sudan. Mr. Azraq spokeon how the eight major 
ethnic groups in Dafur have played an important role in the 
Sudanese economy, both in agricultural production in Dafur and 
as seasonal labor in the southern, eastern and even northern regions.
Both of the Dafur representatives described how the so called 
"janjaweed" were of Arab ethnicity and were being used by the 
NIF government in Khartoum to conduct ethnic cleansing for the 
purposes of expanding what is traditionaly known of as the "Arab belt" 
into areas previously considered African. Dr. Khedir of the NDA 
charged that the NIF government was behind the janjaweed and had 
been moving many of them into southern and even eastern Sudan to hide 
them from the ongoing investigation by the international community into 
the crisis in Dafur. This charge was supported by both the Dafur 
representatives who charged that the janjaweed had always been acting 
as agents of the Bashir government and that many of their members 
had recently been incorporated into the Sudanese military and even 
the police in an attempt to conceal their identity.
The program on Dafur on Eri-TV was conducted in English and was 
apparently aimed at the international community in an effort to 
present what the internationaly accredited representatives of the 
Dafur people had to say about what was going on in their homeland. 
The second part of the program will conclude on Tues, Oct. 12. on Eri-TV, 
available on satellite dish through 
Globecast.com.
---------------------------------------
Ramadan 1425 began on Saturday, Oct. 16
INDEPENDENT WITNESSES SAY 
ISNA-ICNA 
MISLED MUSLIMS on START OF RAMADAN
[New Trend presents a report by Dr. Omar Afzal, of Ithaca, New York, 
who is not part of 
Jamaat al-Muslimeen 
or of ISNA. He heads the CCOI which only deals with crescent sightings.]]
ISNA, ICNA and Shura Council Blunder Again
The Committee for Crescent Observation International affirms its 
decision that the Ramadan crescent moon was NOT SEEN anywhere in 
North America on Thursday evening. Insha-Allah Ramadan will begin 
from Saturday, and not Friday as ISNA, ICNA and Shura Council 
have declared.
Austin, TX sighting was absolutely unacceptable because the crescent 
moon was NOT SEEN anywhere west of Austin, especially in Arizona 
and California. The horizon everywhere west of Austin was extremely 
clear. Hundreds of Muslims looked for the moon and reported seeing NONE. 
Only ISNA Fuqaha could accept Austin sighting VALID though:
- 
The moon was seen only by a man and a woman;
 
- 
just 2-3 minutes after sunset;
 
- 
for 2-3 minutes, and then it disappeared;
 
- 
It was not a crescent, but a straight line;
 
- 
It was to the right of the sun.
 
ISNA’s own experts rejected this Shahadah (See below). But ISNA uses 
every trick in its sleeves to synchronize the Ramadan and 
Eidain 
dates in N. America with the Middle Eastern countries.
If a moon was not seen west of Austin for thousands of miles it 
is concrete and irrefutable evidence that Ramadan moon was NOT SEEN 
in Austin. ISNA Fiqh Council and Shura Council have misled the Muslims 
in North America again as they have been doing in the past and asked 
Muslims to fast on the last day of Sha’ban.
Following are quotes from two of the ISNA’s own consultants:
Khalid Shaukat 
(Moonsighting.com)
ISNA's ANNOUNCEMENT: Based on reported crescent sighting in Austin, Texas 
by two witnesses, the Islamic Shura Council of North America and the 
Fiqh Council of North America declare Friday, October 15th the first day 
of Ramadan.  I voiced my opinion that this witness is not credible but 
ISNA made the decision.
Mohib DURRANI (Hilal Sighting.com)
10:50 pm EDST, 14 Oct 2004:A Second Telephone call was made to the 
person in Austin, Texas, and only the sister was available, and she 
mentioned that she is not sure if the curvature of the apparent 
sighting was up or down. The sister had mentioned in the 8:30 pm 
report that the apparent sighting was to the right of the Sun that 
was already set. She had seen the apparent sighting around three (3) 
minutes after sunset, for a maximum of about two (2) minutes and 
was about two (2) finger widths above the horizon,....
8:30 pm EDST, 14 Oct 2004 There was an Apparent Sighting around 7:00 pm 
(West Austin, Texas) which was confirmed as NOT THE HILAL. The sister 
and her husband had seen a thin white line which was curved so that 
the ends were pointing down. The curvature was from 9-to-12-to-3-O'Clock 
positions for the sister and from 10-to-12-to-2-O'Clock for the husband. 
An actual Hilal would have its ends pointing away from the Sun and 
hence would be pointing upwards and not downwards. 
Hence this Austin Texas report is NOT OF A HILAL.
The Greenwich Royal Observatory has a site which can calculate and 
evaluate the level of visibility of the new moon anywhere in the world. 
The site is a very simple to use the link is given below: 
http://websurf.nao.rl.ac.uk
- 
click on the Moon_Viz option given on the left-side menu. - specify 
name of the place you wish to find data about ie. 
Mecca.
 
- 
it will produce a latitude/longitude reference, if this is correct 
click on the name of the place.
 
- 
then select a period of interest ie. 14th Oct 2004 to 17th Oct 2004, 
click OK.
 
- 
the data will be produced, the far left column is the IMPORTANT one 
this evaluates the ease of visibility.
 
The Greenwich Royal Observatory through their calculations (webSurf 
facility) indicate that there is no place on earth where the new moon 
will be visible on Thursday 14th October 2004.
Results:
Mecca (Saudi Arabia): THU - not visible, FRI - easily visible
LONDON (UK) THU - not visible,  FRI - may need optical aid
Rabat (Morocco): THU - not visible, FRI - easily visible
New York (USA): THU - not visible, FRI - easily visible
Johannesburg (S. Africa): THU - not visible, FRI - easily visible
Melbourne (Australia): THU - not visible, FRI - easily visible
Oslo (Norway): THU - not visible, FRI - not visible, SAT - easily visible
------------------------------------------
Zionist Jew 
Pumped 20 bullets into 13 Year old Palestinian Girl
Only the Zionists Kill Like That!
by William Hughes
[The writer is a long time human rights activist. He lives in 
Baltimore and occasionally contributes to New Trend.]
"Only Capone Kills Like That!" - George "Bugs" Moran
On Feb. 14, 1929, seven men, believed to be associated with the 
Northside gang of George "Bugs" Moran, were lined up against the rear 
wall of a Clark St. garage and machine gunned to death. The massacre 
was orchestrated by Al "Scarface" Capone, who had been feuding with 
Moran for supremacy of Chicago's lucrative criminal enterprises. 
Capone denied any personal involvement, since he was in Florida at 
the time of the ghastly event. On hearing the news of the mass 
slaughter, Moran who had himself luckily escaped the Clark St. carnage, 
said: "Only Capone kills like that!"
Moran's cogent quote came to my mind on hearing of the circumstances 
surrounding the death on Oct. 5, 2004, of an unarmed 13-year-old 
Palestinian school girl, Iman al-Hams, by members of the Israeli 
Occupation Army (IOF). 
NBC Nightly News, 
on Oct. 12th, ran an account of the brutal killing. That was highly 
unusual in itself. Normally, any news which is in anyway critical of 
Israel is immediately dispatched down the "Memory Hole" without seeing 
the light of day. Even Tom Brokaw, a Zionist sympathizer, who introduced 
the al-Hams' segment, seemed taken aback by its viciousness. After 
watching the NBC TV clip, I, too, was appalled. I also had a hard time 
accepting the fact that my country is underwriting this kind of state 
sponsored terrorism. Try $3 billion plus a year in freebies to Israel 
and over $100 billion, since 1948 
(wrmea.com).
The word "complicity" is also relevant here. Absent the U.S.'s massive 
financial and military arms subsidies to Israel, and our rubber stamping, 
since 1967, of its illegal occupation of the lands of the Palestinians, 
I wonder: Would al-Hams still be alive today? Would, too, all the 
other uncounted crimes associated with Israel's unlawful occupation 
have occurred? 
(http://www.endtheoccupation.org/index.php). 
Before the Israeli state was sanctioned, in 1948, by the U.N., with 
the support of the U.S., America didn't have any enemies in the 
Mideast and the Palestinians were living in peace on their ancient 
lands. Now, no American is safe anywhere on the face of the globe 
("The Sorrows of Empire," Chalmers Johnson); and, millions of 
Palestinians have been cruelly exiled by the IOF 
(http://www.un.org/Depts/dpa/ngo/history.html). 
When, if ever, are Americans going to connect the dots between 
Zionist wrongdoing in the Middle East and our personal and 
national vulnerability to terrorist attacks? When are we going to put 
the interests of our Republic first? When?
The only thing I know for sure about this latest act of Israeli 
barbarism, the wasting of the life of al-Hams, is that 
none of 
Israel's lackeys in the U.S. Congress, such as Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA), 
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) or 
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-CT), will raise any objection to it.
 
These characters can be counted on by Tel Aviv to maintain their vows 
of silence with respect to al-Hams' inexcusable killing, as they 
have about Israel's deliberate and murderous attack on June 8, 1967, 
on the USS Liberty 
(http://www.ussliberty.org); 
the unforgivable treason of the spy, Jonathan Pollard ("The Jonathan 
Pollard Spy Case," Court TV's Crime Library, Denise Noe); and the 
indefensible killing of American peace and justice activist, 
Rachel Corrie, in Israeli-Occupied Rafah, on March 16, 2003. She was 
ran over twice by a monster-sized Israeli bulldozer, while attempting 
to prevent a Palestinian home demolition 
(http://www.rachelcorrie.org).
According to a published report, "al-Hams was shot around 20 times as 
she walked past an Israeli military outpost en route to school in 
Rafah, a refugee camp on Gaza's border with 
Egypt
...Unidentified soldiers from the outpost told Israeli 
media 
that after the initial volley killed the girl, their commander went 
out and fired into her body repeatedly. The accounts were consistent 
with Palestinian eyewitness testimony...Military sources said the 
company commander has been suspended pending the results of an 
investigation into the Oct. 5 slaying" ("Israeli Officer Suspended Over 
Gaza Girl's Killing," Reuters, Dan Williams, Oct. 13, 2004). 
BBC News 
reported on Oct. 11, 2004, re: al-Hams, that soldiers from the Givati 
brigade platoon, in the Tel Sultan neighborhood, told Israeli 
television: "(The officer) was hot to take out terrorists and shot 
the girl to relieve pressure..."
Another news account of the killing of al-Hams, indicated that after 
she was shot and had fallen to the ground, the company commander of 
the outpost "approached the body and fired two bullets at her head 
before switching his gun to automatic...Doctors found more than 
20 bullets in her...'He pumped her full of holes. We were in shock, 
we grabbed our heads. We couldn't believe what he was doing. Our 
hearts ached for her...' Yesterday, an army source said an investigation 
has begun, but it was 'too early to speak of criminal charges.' The 
soldiers were so disgusted by the slow pace of an army investigation 
that they approached the Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth to demand the 
officer's dismissal" ("Dead Palestinian Girl 'Riddled with Bullets,'" 
The Guardian, Conal Urquhart, 10/11/04).
Investigation! Dismissal! Criminal charges! Punishment! Sure, 
Americans have heard those words before about Israeli outrages from 
Israeli apologists, as have the British, and nothing is ever really 
done about them. The family of Tom Hurndall, age 22, a peace activist 
from Great Britain, who was shot, in April, 2003, at Rafah, by the 
Israelis and reduced to a "vegetative state," is still waiting for 
the truth from the Israeli authorities. Hurndall was trying to "protect 
children under fire from Israeli soldiers."
James Miller's family, too, is looking for answers. He was a 34-year-old 
TV cameraman from England, who was gunned down by the IOF, in May, 2003, 
also at Rafah, in the Gaza Strip, while "filming bulldozers destroying 
homes." And, then there is the case of Iain Hook, another British 
subject ("The Invisible Death of Iain Hook," Ira Chernus, 11/25/02, 
commondreams.org). 
He was working for the UN, in 
Jenin, 
which had just been subjected to a two week merciless Israeli assault 
("Searching Jenin," Ramzy Baroud, Ed.), when "he was shot by an 
Israeli sniper on Nov. 22, 2002." His fellow U.N. workers labeled 
his killing, "cold-blooded murder." The British families have accused 
the Israeli authorities of "fabricating evidence, suppressing 
investigations and covering-up deliberate killings" ("Families Seek 
Truth Over Israeli Deaths," The Guardian, Chris McGreal, 10/20/03).
Tom Hurndall's grieving mother, Jocelyn, called the Israeli government, 
"a deeply immoral regime which is cruel beyond human understanding." 
I think she's absolutely right. I believe the family of al-Hams, and 
all the other victims over the years of the Zionist Death & Mayhem Machine, 
would agree fully with that opinion. A vast majority of Americans 
would also agree, too, and demand and end to the excesses of 
Zionist Israel, if they knew the full truth about the so-called, 
"Only democracy in the Middle East" 
(http://www.ifamericansknew.org).
Finally, when I ponder how the innocent Iman al-Hams, only 13 years of 
age, died at the hands of the Israelis, on Oct. 5, 2004, while on her 
way to school, I feel compelled to say: "Only the Zionists kill like 
that!"
© William Hughes 2004
William Hughes is the author of "Saying 'No’ to the War Party" 
(IUniverse, Inc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
click here to email
 
a link to this 
article
2004-10-23 Sat 07:14ct