Sha'aban 25, 1425/ October 10, 2004             #99
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MURDER and Mayhem in 
Pakistan:
On October 9, two top Islamic leaders who lead the movement to safeguard 
the Finality of Prophethood central to Islam were gunned down in Karachi. 
Military units have been called into the city after the murders of Maulana 
Nazir Ahmad Taunsvi and Mufti Jamil Ahmed as thousands come out into the 
streets to protest [Oct. 10]. The murdered scholars are seen as 
"pro-Taliban" by westernized elements in Pakistan.
Earlier in Multan, huge bomb attacks were carried out against Sunni Muslim 
crowds who came to honor a scholar who defended the honor of the 
Companions of the Prophet (pbuh). At least 45 people were killed and 
more than 100 wounded. Still earlier, a Shi'ite place of prayer was 
attacked in the city of Sialkot with 30 deaths and many injuries.
October 11 report indicates that a Shi'ite mosque has been attacked in 
Lahore.
Is there a sectarian war going on in Pakistan? What is the government's 
role? What's really going on? Is this part of the 
"war on terror?"  
See 
New Trend's 
next issue for in-depth analysis.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
CNN REPORT on 
AFGHAN 
ELECTIONS FATALLY FLAWED: KARZAI is a DISASTER for 
AMERICA
NewsNight@CNN.com
Wolf@CNN.com
Dear producer
I saw Christiane Amanpour reporting on the Afghan elections from 
Kabul, Afghanistan [October 9 and 10]. I don't blame her for staying 
within the security zone in Kabul. It could have been downright 
dangerous for her outside Kabul even with maximum security provided 
by American special forces.
However, there can be no excuse for inaccurate reporting and none at 
all for attempting to mislead American audiences of CNN. Here are a 
few corrections:
- 
Ms. Amanpour claimed that elections were peaceful and the Taliban threat 
did not materialize. The Pakistani 
media, 
however, provide specific information which proves otherwise. 
There were Taliban attacks in southern, southwestern and southeastern 
in which 33 soldiers recruited by the U.S. were killed. 
In one attack a U.S. army truck was reported hit and all in it killed.
- 
Within KABUL, the 
German 
embassy came under rocket attack and three security guards were killed. 
Surely Ms. Amanpour couldn't have missed that news. Is she under orders 
not to report any bad news?
 
- 
One explanation could be that Ms. Amanpour can't read Urdu and thus 
missed all the news outside her security perimeter in Kabul.
 
 
- 
The photography which accompanied Ms. Amanpour's reports was also meant 
to mislead American audiences. She repeatedly showed us two lines of voters.
[The same two lines again and again.] In a poor country, it's 
always possible to round up a few people to "vote" or for any 
other photo-op. Anyone who knows Afghan facial features would know 
at a glance that thepeople lined up [probably within the security 
perimeter] belonged to two TINY minority groups in Afghanistan: 
Panjshiris and Hazaras. [Look up any basic book on physical features 
of Afghanistan.]
 
- 
Ms. Amanpour's journalism was fatally flawed in that she did not let 
viewers know the most important fact about Afghanistan: The majority 
of Afghans are Pashtuns. They did not endorse 
the elections and most of them are supporting the Taliban.
 
- 
On October 9, Ms. Amanpour declared that Karzai was part of the 
resistance [against the Soviets]. This is certainly not true. I would 
advise her to do her reading. If she can't read Urdu, let her read a 
book by a senior American intelligence officer titled IMPERIAL HUBRIS. 
Thebook points out in no uncertain terms that Karzai was NOT part of 
the resistance, has no roots in Afghanistan or in the Pashtun 
population. He is a Pashtun but only to the extent Colin Powell and 
Armstrong are African-Americans. He has no 
Islamic 
credentials either. IMPERIAL HUBRIS points out that there is no future 
for Karzai in Afghanistan. He is a "dead man walking." 
[Your intelligence officer's words.]
 
- 
CNN's little "after election" vignette of Hikmet Karzai, Hamid Karzai's 
cousin, should have been educational about the futility of America's 
choices in Afghanistan. First note the nepotism: Hikmet, Karzai's 
cousin, is "First Secretary" of the Afghan "Embassy" in Washington. 
Second, the cousin looked like no Afghan. He does not give the 
slightest impression of being:
- 
Pashtun.
 
- 
Afghan.
 
- 
Muslim.
 
 
This election is an imposition on the Afghan people. As IMPERIAL HUBRIS 
points out, no imposition by Europeans and Americans will ever be 
acceptable to the Afghan people. If tomorrow American, German and other 
European forces are withdrawn, the Taliban will sweep into Kabul.
Sincerely
Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D
------------------------------------------------
Interview with Sis. Amina Shaikh
London, England
Very Young British Muslimah Uncovers 
Israeli 
Oppression.
Arrested, Strip Searched, Interrogated for No Reason.
Israeli Troops Within Third Holiest Mosque of Islam.
[Also, Reveals Fearful Condition of British Muslims. Persecuted Minority.]
[The interview was carried out by a sisterhood group in England.]
Sis. Amina: Assalam-U-Alaikuim Wa Rahmatullah akhee
Firstly I would like to thank you for allowing me to relay what had 
happened to us in 
Palestine. 
It was an ordeal and a half but I guess the 'aftermath' is something 
that I never expected to receive that is certain sections of the 
Muslim Community making you feel like you had done something wrong. 
Allah knows best.
Q. Could you you introduce yourself to our readers?
Ans. My name is Sister Amina Shaikh
Q. What took you to "Israel"/Palestine?
Ans. The reason for me going was because I was fed up of sitting around 
and just hearing the suffering of the Muslims, but yet not physically 
doing anything myself. Supplicating is important, but I was feeling that 
I was gradually getting immune to the statistics of innocent people 
being killed, but I was not able to feel as much pain as I should of 
what they are going through.
I had read eye witness accounts of the 
Jenin Massacre 
which saddened me of the injustice and oppressive state of affairs 
that existed in Palestine.
I knew that I couldn't change their situation single handedly but I 
wanted to try and bring a smile to an orphaned child's face at the 
very least, see what is happening and return to create awareness and 
feel the pain.
Q. Could you describe the circumstances of your arrest?
Ans. We arrived in Jerusalem on Tuesday. As we could not be in time 
for Ishaa at Masjid Al Aqsa we decided to go on the following days for 
each Salat including Tahajud Inshallah until we had decided to go to 
Nablus to teach orphaned chidlren English and drama at a voluntary 
organisation called project hope 
www.palhope.net.
We were told that it was safe for us to travel there. That was true, 
because Alhamdulillah when we went to the Mosque in the early hours it 
was literally down the road about 5 minutes walk. There was no 
danger, it was beautiful seeing tajweed classes, people praying etc.
It was very beautiful to have seen it. Mashallah it was 
beautiful................
It was a Friday when we had decided that after Tahajud we would be 
heading for Nablus. We had decided to wake up at about 3:30-3:45 to 
leave for about 4 for Tahajud when we heard a knock on our door at 
about 3:00-3:30 in the morning. We asked who it was but there was no 
reply. They knocked again, we asked again who it was. They said that 
they were the police and that we should open the door. The first 
thing that we all thought about was to grab our hijaabs.
Thereafter that is when the pathetic nature of the so called democratic 
and 
racist 
regime was to be revealed......
Our room was raided, there were about 20 armed police and army officers 
that entered the room. We were taken individually to a room where 
we they did a body search (embarrasingly known as strip search where 
they told us to take all of our clothes except for underclothes). 
(not sure whether we should publish this part akhee. I 
do feel embarrassed about it to be honest!!!)
We kept on asking them what this was about and why we were being treated 
in this manner, but they would not reply. They didn't tell us anything 
apart from on one or two occasions falsely reassure us that things would 
be okay within four hours or so.
They took us to the police station where they took us in different rooms. 
I knew that in the name of so called national security or basically 
taking advantage that as we are not aware of the due legal process that 
they would deny us to see a lawyer, which was exactly what they did.
Their intelligence wasn't smart though, I could overhear the two other 
sisters being questioned!!! anyhow they asked me quite a few times what 
my purpose of visiting Israel was. I told them the truth in that I was 
touring!!!!
Q. How were you treated by the Israeli officers who arrested you?
Ans. The officers were very sarcastic, there was one 'good cop' and one 
'bad cop' if you can refer to them in that way at all. The former was 
falsely reassuring me that everything will be okay they are just 
carrying out a routine action the bad cop was just being sarcastic 
and patronizing and coming up with silly things like we know what 
you are up to, come on tell us the truth, what you are saying is 
different from what the other girls are saying. I told him to release 
them then and keep me, but they were adamant that we should all stay there.
They were pathetic; they would ask me from time to time, what is your 
purpose for visiting?
They told us that they had informed the British Consulate (which later on 
transpired to be a lie, they weren't informed at least by that time)
Q. What were the allegations that were levelled against you? What did 
you make of these?
Ans. They tried to say at first that we were part of an organisation 
during questioning to one of the sisters and then prior to taking us 
to the court we were taken to the secret services. They didn't have 
a clue what was going on, they thought that we were being done for 
Immigration charges and then they said that they knew that we were 
part of a terrorist organisation. We were outraged by these 
assertions, they tried to get us to sign something at the station 
where these assertions were made. HOwever, we refused to do so 
because the writing was in Hebrew.
There was a time when I thought ah well Allah knows best wouldn't 
put it past them they could fabricate evidence.
It was only at this point prior to going to the court that we were 
allowed limited access to contact a lawyer; unfortunately we didn't 
have any contact numbers. I tried to call someone in the UK to 
obtain details of a lawyer, but there was insufficient time to 
do so, they only let us make one call each. Even though by this 
time they had monitored our phones because they took our details and it 
felt like that whenever we made a call thereafter.
When we were in court the authorities showed so called secret 
evidence to the judge, despite our pleas to have a look at the 
evidence we were refused to see it on the basis that it was 
secret. This was really pathetic how can we possibly challenge something 
that we are unaware of. It reminded me of those brothers that are 
detained in Belmarsh and Woodhill prison who are detained without 
having access to evidence. How on the earth can you defend 
yourself. I was told later on that an application can be made if we 
appealed against the courts decision to the supreme court by 
submitting an application. However, there was no guarantee that we 
could still see it.
Q. Could you describe the conditions under which you were detained: 
where were you located, food and hygine conditions,for how long were 
you held?
Ans. We were held in their station for over 11 hours, they questioned us 
on an off, but still it was frustrating because they were keeping us 
for no reason whatsoever, I did my own resistance by refusing food 
and so did the other sister, I didn't want them to know this. They 
pretended that they were worried I guess the last thing they wanted 
was us to be in hospital from a rep point of view, not that they 
really cared. When they tried to convince me to eat I told them that 
I just wanted to get out of here. The officer replied by stating 
that they will take us out of the country.
They didn't let me read anything while I was waiting, I wanted to 
keep my mind active, but obviously even while you are waiting I 
guess it is what you called psychological games.
Q. Did you suffer any mistreatment or abuse?
Ans. It was just humiliating the way that we were kept in. We hadn't done 
anything wrong, Alhamdulillah. We were physically abused.
There was a frame with Allah's attributes in 
Arabic, 
they asked me if I could read it, I provided them with an evasive answer 
as I didn't want to read it to them, instead one of the them said in 
the name of Allah the most beneficent the most merciful in Arabic; 
it sickened me like anything to see it.
We think that they pretty much realised that it was a blunder on 
their part, but they wanted to be nasty to see it through so they 
continued. They knew that there was nothing on us, otherwise the 
Judge would not have stated that there is no real evidence, however 
in light of the current situation (yep that is a joke!!!!). We were 
put under house arrest where we had access to our cell phones and were 
allowed to go in close proximity to buy food. The court order stipulated 
that financial arrangements would be made by the authorities and they 
had until the following MOnday (not that lapse of this time meant we 
were free to go wherever we wanted though). Alhamdulillah the reason 
why weren't shaken or overtly distressed was because we only feared 
Allah and unified with each other in the true spirit of Sisterhood 
Alhamdulillah.
Q. Did you have access to a lawyer? How long before?
Ans. The lawyer at the court was a public attorney it didn't seem as 
though he knew what he was doing, we had to find our own lawyer in the 
end to see if we can apply for revocation of the court order (it was not 
a deportation order)
Q. Were you able to contact family? When did they realise what had 
happened and what was their reaction?
Ans. Upon returning from the court we could contact our parents, I 
decided against it as I didn't want to worry them. It was only until 
after the second court appearance because by this time we were getting 
news coverage of the way that we were unjustly treated that I had to 
inform my parents. The second court appearance was to do with deciding 
who would pay for our flights back, in accordance to the court order it 
would be the authorities. They claimed that they didn't have sufficient 
funds (yeh right pull the other one I thought!!). Further submissions 
were made; they let us only go in the old city which has the mosques!!! 
and other things!!
Q. What was the lowest point in your ordeal?
Ans. The lowest point of the ordeal I guess was the secret evidence and 
the restriction imposed in that we weren't allowed to go to Nablus!!
Q. What led to your release?
Ans. We agreed to leave. Our case was in the criminal courts, had we 
not agreed to leave the country our case would have been transferred 
to the Immigration courts where they would have deported us. We heard 
that the chances of successfuly resisting a deportation order was next 
to nothing as the authorities could do pretty much what they wanted.
Q. Why do you believe you were targetted?
Ans. The only reason for targetting us in that way was because we 
were Muslims, sisters covered as well, and that they don't want people to 
witness a nation (Palestine) that is suffering in silence.
Q. What was the response of the British Government and the Foreign Office 
at the time?
Ans. The Consulate were foul,.I had to contact them which a member called 
Sameer reluctantly agreed to do  see us. We had explained that we weren't 
allowed to see him, so, he visited us with his wife, apparently she had 
to go shopping. So unprofessional! Anyhow all that he was interested in 
was for us to leave, even though I found out later on when I complained 
to his colleagues that it was part of his duty to provide us with a list 
of lawyers.
I contacted Sameer on Sunday (we were arrested and taken to court on 
the previous Friday). He said that he found out about us on Saturday, 
but he couldn't get hold of the consultate so he asked the authorities 
to pass a message. I was amazed at this response. In his defence he 
said that 'well what am I supposed to have done after I told the 
authorities was I supposed to check with them whether or not I was 
contacted?' I told him that how could he have entrusted the authorities 
with this task. I didn't get a satisfactory response. From then onwards 
I knew that he wasn't going to help us, so somehow we had to find a 
lawyer ourself. Since then up till now the Foreign office haven't 
contacted us to check the welfare, even while we were there no steps 
were taken to exert diplomatic pressure for our movements and stay not 
to be restricted. I guess that we are Muslims what do you expect???
Q. How were you treated on your return to the UK by the Muslim community?
Ans. I guess we were treated generally okay, but there were a few 
incidents that occured, there is a sister that I know of,well I would 
regard her as an acquaintance. She advised my friend against asking me 
to do an opening speech at the opening of her Muslim school because I 
may bring adverse publicity as people may regard me as terrorists. 
Subhanallah I couldn't believe it. Not only do I not understand the 
exact definition of the word that is used by people, but besides that 
our crime was that we wanted to teach children, didn't she read the 
newspaper article that stated 'Israeli blunder' and mentioned that 
there were no charges made against us and no conviction, and in case 
she hasn't noticed we were questioned here yet!!! wish that she would 
read the newspaper.
Then my own cousin, yep own family after I had told her about the 
raid said 'come on Amina you must have done something.' Subhannallah, 
I couldn't believe that again being a Muslim and wanting to teach 
children according to the Israeli authorities was enough for them 
to treat us in such a manner.
Then a close friend of mine, who is similar to me in her way of thinking 
told me that we couldn't keep in touch by phone or email becuase she 
had to protect her family and herself as there werenumerous raids 
happening to Muslim. I tried to explain to her that we hadn't done 
anything wrong and asked her if she had read the Guardian report 
properly. She said that she hadn't. I Tried to say that she was getting 
paranoid and that if Muslims weren't supportive at these times, (not 
that we went as bad an ordeal as the brothers in Belmarsh and woodhill)!! 
but say if brother Babar Ahmed, Inshallah is released and tries to 
integrate in the Muslim Community and he is treated by his fellow 
Muslims like this how do you think that he would feel.
We wanted to do presentations to share our ordeal. After approaching 
Muslim organisations, I was completely surprised. One told me that 
'sister I am sure that you are genuine but do you know what we have to 
be careful with our organisation because you may get infiltrators. I was 
shocked with this remark, because their theme was 'secret evidence' and 
I wanted to talk about our frustration about it, even though it isn't on 
a large scale as the brothers!!!  Again I wondered if the brother really 
read the newspaper.
Then there was city circles, because I used to volunteer for a Saturday 
School that they funded. It seemed as they were more concerned with me as 
an individual i.e had I done anything wrong. Because the brother in 
charge said that before we decide on giving you the platform he would 
like to meet me as he wanted to see the implications of us giving a talk!!! 
Subhanallah has he read the newspaper reports, what does he think that I 
have done whilst in Palestine. What does he think that I would propagate, 
anyway as I knew that one of the sisters wanted to do it, I agreed but 
I mentioned that Smra would come as well. She travelled with me to 
Jerusalem. All that he said was that he didn't want to see anyone else 
as I was linked to the Saturday School.
Q. How has this experience affected you? Do you feel traumatised? What 
lessons have been learnt?
Ans. Allah didn't decree for us to go, but Inshallah I would love to go 
to Nablus, next time with a Mahrem Inshallah. It was difficult to accept 
it Inshallah, but do you know what whatever Allah decreed?
This is not to say that this takes away the resentfulness we have 
towards the authorities and the lack of assistance by the British 
Government. But one thing is for sure that I pray hard to Allah that 
he makes it possible for me to return there Inshallah.
Q. Did you witness anything of the suffering of the Palestinians while in 
Israel?
Ans. The presence of the occupying forces was provocative in itself 
becuase they were present at the entrance of the 
Masjid Alqsa 
and in the compound of the two mosques. We managed to see part of the 
wall which we were disgusted with and had heard that they are building 
it around towns. Thus if you have a land adjoined to your house, your 
land could be on the other side of the wall, to which you can only 
have access of two hours.
We have come across of people that have told us that Masjid Al Aqsa 
doesn't belong just to the Palestinians but it belongs to all Muslims. 
Therefore, where are the Muslims.
Then another person said that we need help, where are the Muslims? 
we know that Allah will protect Al-Aqsa Inshallah and us.
Q. How has this helped you to empathise with other Muslim prisoners, 
in Palestine, Uk, Guantanamo?
Ans. We know that the way that we were treated is nothing as 
Palestinians would be, they knocked on the door. How many Palestinian 
people's doors are knocked at instead they just barge into the house.
When we were questioned there was a young woman present with each of us, 
which we found out latter to be one of those drafted. They said that they 
are aware of the Islamic principle that you can't be alone with a man 
therefore they call a woman. Later on we discovered that this rule 
doesn't apply to a woman who they think to be a 'suicide bomber. I am 
sure this rule is subject to abuse.
How many Palestinians are imprisoned not knowing their charge and for 
how long they will be detained, anything ranging from stone throwing 
to breaking the curfew by picking a flower. 'secret evidence' is the 
thing that really links us to the brothers, even though we weren't 
treated as badly as the prisoners in Camp X Ray.
I can't believe that some Muslims actually say that oh they must have 
done something. It is like Yusuf Islam being treated in that way. 
Surely Muslims should be able to wake up now and instead of going 
against Muslims pointing fingers at them they should be supportive.
Q. Do you intend to take any further action?
I guess that Inshalalh as I intend to return I don't want it to be 
prejudicial The Israeli embassy commented to someone (as quoted at the 
bottomn of the evening standard article) stating that they dont' need to 
apologise as we had left.
Q. What are your future plans?
Inshallah pray that I will find someone like minded who would love to 
take me there and it be possible for me to do humanitarian work.
Q. What message do you have for our readers, the Muslims in particular?
Ans. Please don't forget Masjid Al-Aqsa at the very least. As an Ummah 
stand strong and firm and be supportive. Dont' forget the important 
hadiths, 
and the incident mentioned in the Quran signifying the importance.
Q. Is there anything else important we have missed that you wish to add?
Ans. Just to say that I wish that Muslim organisations/people would be 
more trusting of one another!!!! I would like to express my gratitude 
for providing me such an opportunity, really appreciate it. Jazakhallah 
Khairun. Walaikuim Assaalm Wa Rahmatullah
-----------------------------------------
[With thanks to Br. Sa'ad in Arizona,]
US helicopter crew shoots on street crowd
Report, 
Antiwar.com, 
7 October 2004
Britain's Channel 4 News has broadcast a 30-second video clip of a 
U.S. pilot killing a group of what appear to be civilians on a Fallujah 
street. The video includes an audio track of the pilot's conversation 
with mission controllers. As the UK Independent notes, "At no point 
during the exchange between the pilot and controllers does anyone 
ask whether the Iraqis are armed or posing a threat."
Take them out, dude: pilots toast hit on 
Iraqi 
'civilians'
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington, The Independent
06 October 2004
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=569207
"The Pentagon said yesterday it was investigating cockpit video footage 
that shows American pilots attacking and killing a group of apparently 
unarmed Iraqi civilians.
The 30-second clip shows the pilot targeting the group of people in a 
street in the city of Fallujah and asking his mission controllers 
whether he should "take them out". He is told to do so and, shortly 
afterwards, the footage shows a huge explosion where the people were. 
A second voice can be heard on the clip saying: "Oh, dude."
The existence of the video, taken last April inside the cockpit of a 
US F-16 fighter has been known for some time, though last night's 
broadcast by Channel 4 News is believed to be the first time a mainstream 
broadcaster has shown the footage.
At no point during the exchange between the pilot and controllers does 
anyone ask whether the Iraqis are armed or posing a threat. Critics say 
it proves war crimes are being committed."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
click here to email
 
a link to this 
article
2004-10-11 Mon 19:24ct