Jamada al-Thani 13, 1425/ July 31, 2004 #77
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jamaat al-Muslimeen National Shoora Meeting
For Human Rights, Justice and Peace

The next shoora [consultative committee] meeting of Jamaat al-Muslimeen will be held in Atlanta on August 21, inshallah.

If you would like to have an issue placed on the agenda, please contact the Secretary General at:

pansygen@yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------
Jamaat al-Muslimeen
Boycott Movement Against Zionism

HOW TO RESPOND TO GOVERNMENT BAN ON MAJOR MUSLIM CHARITIES
BEST WAY: HIT THE ZIONISTS IN THE POCKET BOOK. DON'T BUY FROM
BUSINESSES WHICH SUPPORT ISRAEL

The U.S. government is repeatedly hitting Muslim charities. The latest are indictments against Muslims in Texas accused of supporting Hamas. This whole campaign against Muslim charities is fake and there is a clear Zionist hand behind these moves. How do we know? Look at this:

The government is claiming that Holy Land was helping Hamas. Two years of this persecution have passed and the pro-Zionist regime has not been able to bring any evidence of this.

IS HAMAS FIGHTING AMERICA? The answer is a clear NO. There has never been any attack by Hamas on the U.S. So why these accusations?

It simply means that the Zionist Jews are claiming that anyone who fights Israel is against America and in fact is a terrorist. This entire Zionist argument is bogus. There are millions of Americans opposed to Israel who can in no way be considered anti-American. The WORLD KNOWS THAT ISRAEL IS A TERRORIST ENTITY.

WHAT CAN BE DONE TO OPEN THE LOCK ON THE CHARITIES?

We are 7 to 10 million Muslims in America. We can easily hit Israel in the pocket. book. All we need are ONE MILLION MUSLIMS IN AMERICA to withdraw only $100 each month from the pro-Zionist businesses in this country. That will hit the Zionist Jews with a $100 million boycott. After that they'll quickly come to their senses.

Jamaat al-Muslimeen is very good at making this boycott real. If CAIR does not want to take on the Zionists directly, all we ask is that CAIR open up its audiences to Jamaat al-Muslimeen activists. We'll show you how to do it.

CONTACT Jamaat al-Muslimeen's Director of Boycott at: PRADIA2@aol.com
-------------------------------------------------------
MESSAGE TO JOHN EDWARDS: DID HE STEAL A DRAFT of BUSH'S SPEECH

Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:19:41 -0400
To: "John Edwards"

TO: JOHN EDWARDS,

YOUR SPEECH LAST NIGHT COULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN IN FRONT OF THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION. YOU ARE PRO WAR, PRO BUILDING UP MILITARY, PRO SENDING IN MORE TROOPS, DESTROYING AL QAEDA ALL OVER THE WORLD (BUSH'S WORDS THAT YOU PLAGIARIZED LAST NIGHT), PRO ISRAEL-THE ROOT OF ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS AND PRO DESTROYING IRAN AND N. KOREA BECAUSE THEY HAVE ARMS. ISRAEL HAS ARMS AND HAS NOT SIGNED THE NONPROLIFERATION AGREEMENT, IS OCCUPYING FOUR COUNTRIES, HAS A HOLOCAUST GOING ON THAT OUR GOVERNMENT IS PAYING FOR, AND YOU THINK YOU WILL BRING PEACE TO THE MIDDLE EAST. I THINK NOT.

YOU ARE GIVING HOPE TO PEOPLE WITH NO MONEY TO HANG IN THERE UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION FOR HELP IS ON THE WAY. PLEASE....THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. THE PEOPLE HEARD THESE SAME CAMPAIGN PROMISES BEFORE CLINTON WAS ELECTED, OR ANY OTHER POLITICIAN. WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO GET THE MONEY????????????????

SICK OF POLITICAL PROMISES.

Carolyn
FLORIDA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT but UNDERCOVERED NEWS:

KASHMIR: Stunning Mujahideen Commando Raids on Indian Forces

July 28: No one could have thought it possible but two Kashmiri mujahideen penetrated the center of the Indian military occupation forces in the Kashmiri capital city of Srinagar. The two fighters attacked the Indian military camp at Leeward Hotel; in the Dal Gate area of Srinagar killing 5 Indian troops of the CRPF including two officers. They wounded another six Indian troops while they gave their lives.
In a similar attack in the Surankot area of Poonch district, the mujahideen killed five Special Police Officers and injured three of the Indian occupation forces. This time the mujahideen escaped after the attack The raids come after a week full of brutalities, executions, rapes and murders carried out by the Indian army against the people of Kashmir in its attempts to crush resistance.
MUSLIMS FACE HINDU MOBS IN GUJARAT, INDIA
July 26, 27, 28. Mobs of frenzied Hindus egged on by India's fascist groups attacked the Muslim minority in the western Indian coastal town of Veraval. The rioters burned 18 Muslim shops and homes and 13 vehicles before police restored order. Two Muslims were killed, 13 wounded.. When Muslims organized resistance, the police moved in.
GROWING SIGNS OF WAR SPREADING IN PAKISTAN
KOHAT: A gathering of Pakistani intelligence officers was attacked in this stronghold of the Pakistani military by a martyrdom assailant. Two senior officers of the Intelligence Bureau, an Assistant Director and an Inspector were killed. Another two Inspectors and a security guard of the military police were injured. [July 28]
[Pakistan military's PR officer talking to western reporters denied that the incident ever happened; however it has been reported from witnesses in major English and Urdu newspapers from Pakistan.]

WANA, SOUTH WAZIRISTAN:
PAKISTANI MILITARY FORCES have imposed night curfew on populated areas of Azam Warsak, Shah Alam, Shin Warsak, Dab Koat, Gangikhel, Zari Noor, Raghzai, Tiarza and Machen Baba. The troops have orders to shoot on sight anyone who comes out. Observers say this indicates that the Pakistani army sees the ENTIRE POPULATION of this area as part of the resistance. In spite of curfew, Islamic militants fired on a Pakistani army camp. The Pakistani troops retaliated with heavy artillery. The exchange of fire continued for an hour.

EXCHANGES OF FIRE IN Areas of BALUCHISTAN
Pakistani troops are facing a tribal uprising along the Makran coastline. The military has exchanged fire with tribal fighters and is said to be on a search-and-destroy mission with little success.

AFRICAN MUSLIMS ARRESTED AS "TERRORISTS"
On July 25, Pakistani forces raided a house in the town of Gujrat [Punjab] in the style of a military operation and arrested 13 people, including 7 women and two little children. The other 4 are men from Africa, including two Muslims from Laudium, South Africa, a Muslim from Tanzania and another Muslim from Kenya. Pakistani newspapers report that these were Islamic families who had arrived in Pakistan to join Islamic communities in the community. The government says that these are Al-Qaida or Taliban terrorists and that an investigation is underway.
AFGHANISTAN: GUERRILLA WARFARE:
In the Spin Boldak area, Taliban fighters set on fire and destroyed SIX TRUCKS carrying supplies from Pakistan to the U.S./coalition forces in Kandahar. [July 26]
TALIBAN ATTACKS ARE NOW APPROACHING THE CAPITAL CITY OF KABUL. In a Taliban rocket attack, an ammunition dump of the European forces on the outskirts of Kabul was blown up with eerie explosions which went on for a long time on July 28.
A sign of the deteriorating situation, "Doctors Without Borders" has decided to withdraw from Afghanistan. While it blames the Taliban for accusing it of spying, it also blamed "THE CO-OPTATION OF HUMANITARIAN AID BY THE COALITION for political and military motives," as the reason for withdrawal. [Source: AFP.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HADITH STUDIES: Ali, r.a., and Abu Huraira, r.a.

The editor of New Trend has been receiving hate mail from Shi'te sectarians abusing Abu Huraira, r.a., one of the greatest companions of the Prophet, pbuh, and extolling the virtues of Ali, r.a.
Islamic understanding must be based on the original texts of Islam, the Qur'an and the authentic Hadith. Islam DOES NOT PERMIT the formation of a cult around Ali, r.a., or any other human figure. There are Hadith praising Ali, r.a., but these are weak and do not come up to the standards of authenticity.
The facts of scholarship are that Ali, r.a., was brave and pious but he was not a great leader, he was not a strategist, and he was not active in Jihad after the Prophet, pbuh, passed away. Ali, r.a., was great in many ways but he was ONLY ONE of the many great people who stood by the Prophet, pbuh.
ABU HURAIRA, r.a., was not less than Ali, r.a., in bravery and fearlessness, as is documented in the history of great battles after the Prophet, pbuh, passed away.
Abu Huraira, r.a., was beloved of the Prophet, pbuh, as was Ali, r.a. However, Abu Huraira, r.a., gave up everything to be able to educate himself in the teachings of the Prophet, pbuh. Hence he became a GREATER SCHOLAR OF HADITH than any other Sahabi, with the exception of 'Ayesha, r.a., and definitely greater than Ali, r.a.
Shi'ite sectarians are doing tremendous damage to the family of Islam by attacking and abusing Abu Huraira, r.a Ali , r.a., himself did not permit such attacks. The Shi'ite Imams, Baqir and Jafar, may Allah fill their graves with light, urged those who admire Ali, r.a., not to attack the SAHABA [companions of the Prophet, pbuh]. Any who continue to do so under the guise of extolling Ali, r.a., can only be seen as ignorant people who are opposing the teachings of their own leaders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Received with thanks from Br. Hodari Ali.]

Oil and Oil Pipelines behind the Humanitarian Crisis in Darfur

British Military Intervention in Sudan
by John Laughland
www.globalresearch.ca 28 July 2004
The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAU407A.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps the most striking thing about the news reports that Britain is thinking of sending troops to Darfur in Sudan is the silence on the matter which has emanated from the usual antiwar campaigners.
Although the Guardian report on the 22nd of July said that a "humanitarian intervention" in Sudan would help retrieve Tony Blair's reputation for moral action after the Iraq debacle ---as if the solution to a bad war was a good one-- the usual suspects have not piped up. And even though the US Congress formally decided on 22 July that genocide" was occurring in Darfur -- "genocide" being an international crime, this is the legal trigger for intervention--- no one has so far pointed out that the same genocide was invoked to justify Nato's aggression against Yugoslavia in 1999.

The silence is all the more odd, given that Darfur is a region which is rich in oil and through which pipelines are to be constructed. Moreover, the main investor in the Sudanese oil industry is the China National Petroleum Company, and China is Sudan's biggest trading partner overall.
[2]
It has been alleged that there are Chinese soldiers in Sudan protecting Chinese oil interests there, and that these troops have engaged in skirmishes with the rebels.
[3]
Moreover, while there are numerous foreign oil companies present in Sudan, it is precisely in Southern Darfur that the Chinese National Petroleum Company has its concessions. USAID, the American humanitarian agency, has helpfully provided a map of Sudan showing precisely where the oil concessions are. See http://www.usaid.gov/locations/sub-saharan_africa/sudan/map_oil.pdf )

It is surely inevitable that there will now be a military intervention by Sudan's former colonial power, Britain. (In one of those delicious ironies of history, it was precisely in China that one of the most famous colonialists of all, General Gordon of Khartoum, distinguished himself before becoming governor of Sudan, where he precisely intervened to protect the blacks in the South from the Muslims who sold them as slaves.
[4]
Tony Blair ostensibly tried to play down the news reports at his monthly press conference on 22 July. But, while saying; as he had done on Iraq-that no decisions had been taken, the Prime Minister also reverted to his habitual use of the language of moralism. A question (planted?) made the comparison between Sudan and Kosovo and Blair replied, "I believe we have a moral responsibility to deal with this and to deal with it by any means that we can"
[5]
This means war. Blair evidently hopes that a humanitarian war will efface the memories of the "war for oil" in Iraq. The opposition to the Kosovo war having been minimal, and international support being widespread for an attack on the "genocidal" Sudanese government, his gamble is likely to pay off. It does not seem to matter to antiwar campaigners that the same language of moralism was used to justify all the other military interventions in Blair's astonishingly militaristic premiership (the "Desert Fox" bombing campaign against Iraq in December 1998; the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999; the intervention in Sierra Leone in 2000; the attack on Afghanistan in 2001; the invasion of Iraq in 2003.) Unfortunately, it is likely that the simple appeal of sending troops to help poor blacks against marauding Muslims will be too strong for most antiwar campaigners to overcome.

Indeed, the Darfur crisis is following a pattern which is so well-worn now that it has almost become routine. Saturation reporting from a crisis region; emergency calls for help broadcast on the electronic media (such as the one recently on the BBC Radio 4 flagship 'Today' programme);televised pictures of refugees; lurid stories of "mass rapes", which are surely designed to titillate as much to provoke outrage; reproachful evocations of the Rwandan genocide; demands that something must be done ("How can we stand idly by?", etc.); editorials in the Daily Telegraph calling for a return to the days of Rudyard Kipling's benevolent imperialism
[6];
and, finally, the announcement that plans are indeed being drawn up for an intervention.

In fact, the routine is now so well established that life even imitated satire when the Daily Telegraph dispatched its 90 year-old former editor, Bill Deedes, to report on the situation in Sudan. Deedes is himself the model for William Boot in Evelyn Waugh's novel, Scoop, whose reports from a fictitious East African state on a war more or less invented by the press baron, Lord Copper, in London, were themselves inspired by the young Deedes' reports from Abyssinia for the Morning Star in 1935.

According to Arab sources quoted by the informative Turkish paper, Zaman, oil is the basis of the crisis in Darfur.
[7]
These sources say that renewed fighting broke out at the very moment when a peace agreement was about to be signed which would have brought an end to 21 years of conflict. This is certainly what the Sudanese government itself alleges. If so, this would conform to the pattern established in Bosnia and Kosovo, when the international community moved to scupper peace deals, preferring to encourage wars which provide the pretext for intervention.

The Sudanese government, which is currently in the cross-hairs of the interventionist West, agrees that there is fighting and there is a humanitarian crisis. But it accuses Western humanitarian organisations and media of over-dramatising the situation in order to provide a pretext for military intervention. The Washington embassy issued the following statement:
"Politicization of the situation in Darfur and its use as a too to destabilize the Government of Sudan must be considered the major factor of the humanitarian disaster there."
[8]
But it correctly denounces the media distortions and calls them propagandis tic.
[9]
It also protests at the claim that it is backing the anjaweed militiamen who are said to be causing so much trouble: this claim is repeated with the same relentlessness as was the similar claim that Serbia was pursuing ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. In reality, Janjaweed militiamen have been subjected to horrific punishments by the Sudanese courts, including amputation.
[10]
Zaman also alleges that some of the groups fighting the central government in Khartoum are supported by Sudan's neighbours, by the US, European governments, and by Israel. The US is said to have given $20 million to the Sudanese People Liberation Army, led by a man who conforms perfectly to the model of the American agent. John Garang is a ruthless killer who has a doctorate from a university in Iowa, and who is a former Marxist who curries support from American Christian undamentalists. (The support of American charities for the "Christians" in Southern Sudan has been a feature of the conflicts there for some years now, even though, as in John Garang's case, the local tribes worship either the sky or animals.
[11])
Garang's movement is supported by the Sudanese Communist Party: communists are, paradoxically, American allies all over Eastern Europe and in many Southern African states.

The suspicion is that intervention will encourage the Southern part of Sudan, including parts of Darfur, will move towards independence, as neighbouring Eritrea did from Ethiopia, and become, like Eritrea, a territory for US bases. Ethiopia, for its part, has funnelled aid from Israel and the US to the SPLA.

Another key figure is Hassan Turabi (Hasan al-Turabi) leader of the Popular National Congress, onetime leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and onetime ally of President Hassan al-Bashir.
Turabi is known as an influential Islamist who is said to have given safe haven to Osama bin Laden.
Although Turabi is denounced (especially by the Sudanese government he is attacking) as a Muslim fundamentalist, other Muslims regard him as a tool of the West.
[12]
Turabi was credited by American commentators as being the author of Sudan's liberal and republican version of Islam.
[13]
Turabi's Justiceand Equality Movement is based in US-controlled Eritrea, from where it issues its official communiquéés. As a turncoat former ally of the president, Turabi fits perfectly into the category of persons often used by outside powers (especially the US) to promote regime change. The tantalising possibility that an old friend of Osama bin Laden might be an American ally in Sudan only nourishes the kind of speculation indulged in by Michael Moore in Fahrenheit 9-11, which dwells at length on the business links between the Bush family and rich Saudis like the bin Ladins. Intervention will allow Western forces to control an oil rich region, and perhaps to expel the present holders of concessions. The fact that the biggest of these is China, and that America's other foreign adventures also seem to have as their goal the control of energy supplies to that strategic rival, only adds further piquancy to what is, otherwise, an all too banal case of modern imperialistic meddling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes

[1] From Rudyard Kipling's "The White Man's Burden," which laments the ingratitude of natives who benefit from British imperialism.

[2] See the interview President Bashir gave to China People's Daily in December 2003: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200312/24/eng20031224_131143.shtm

Bashir said that Sudan supported China's policy of reunification with Taiwan.

[3] http://wwwnewsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/8/26/204458

[4] http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~homeier/interests/heros/gordon.html

[5] See Tony Blair's press conference, 22nd July 2004, http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page6153.asp

[6] "Britain must not turn its back on Sudan's plight", The Daily Telegraph, 19th June 2004

[7] "Oil Underlies Darfur Tragedy," Cumali Onal, Zaman, 7th July 2004. http://www.sudan.net/news/posted/8991.html

[8] 19th July 2004, http://www.sudanembassy.org/default.asp?page=viewstory&id=288

[9] "The Darfur Crisis: Looking beyond the propaganda", Embassy of the Republic of Sudan, Washington DC, 13th July 2004, see especially the section entitled "Propaganda distortions," http://www.sudanembassy.org/default.asp?page=viewstory&id=285

[10] "Sudan jails Darfur militiamen, orders amputations," Nima Elbagir, Reuters, 19th July 2004.

[11] See the BBC profile of Garang from 2002: "Africa's enduring rebel" by Gray Phombea, http://news.bbc.couk/2/hi/africa/2134220.stm

[12] See this denunciation of his pro-Western ideas, as expounded in an interview in Foreign Affairs in 1995: http://www.allaahuakbar.net/individual_callers/hasan_turabi.htm

[13] http://www.espac.org/religion_sudan/religion_in_sudan.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Sent by Sis. Hamdiyyeh in South Carolina]

AMERICAN ROLE BEHIND THE MASSIVE TRAGEDY IN SUDAN

www.1924.org

The situation in the Darfur region of Sudan has become the new focus of the western world, with reports of an estimated one million people being displaced and ten thousand being killed. There has been pressure largely driven by the international community, and America in particular, to act in order to prevent a catastrophe. US House Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California recently stated, "We must act now to avoid more slaughter and avoid a repetition of the genocide in Rwanda 10 years ago. This is a crisis, an emergency. We have the legal obligation under international law to act."

Donald Payne, Democratic representative from New Jersey, told a press conference, "We urge the Secretary of State, Colin Powell to support an immediate intervention to stop the killing. If we fail to act a million people could die before the end of the year."

The Americans have laid the blame for the events in the Darfur squarely at the doorstep of the Sudanese government, whom it claims are sponsoring militias known as the 'Janjaweed' to rampage and kill people. President Bush recently stated,

"They [Sudanese government] must stop Janjaweed violence, they must provide access to humanitarian relief for the people who suffer," he said in a speech in Washington.

Such an outcry from the US and western governments would seem to imply that the situation in Sudan was its own making and not through outside interference. However the situation is far from that, and the Americans have been actively stoking the flames for many years. A brief examination of Sudan shows that the South of the country has much of the natural resources and this is where the US has been trying to secure its influence, and has used a number of policies to achieve these aims.

The Americans have for many years actively funded a terrorist rebel militia, the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA), to fight against the Sudanese government and also to spread disenchantment in the South against the Northern government. This group has been committed untold atrocities throughout Sudan both against government troops as well as civilians, Muslim and Christian. It was under President Clinton that these terrorist militias were given the financial backing to rise up against the Sudanese governments and this policy has been maintained by the Bush administration.

In October 1999 Madeline Albright the then Secretary of State met with the terrorist leader of the SPLA, John Garang. When Madeline Albright met Garang she extended the hand of American friendship and committed to providing huge amounts of "humanitarian aid". This charitable venture was a means to channel vast quantities of money towards the terrorist cause of the SPLA, which at that point had a flagging military fund.

The Economist magazine described the SPLA as "little more than an armed gang of Dinkas, killing, looting and raping. Its indifference, almost animosity, towards the people it was supposed to be 'liberating' was all too clear." [The Economist, March 1998]

The Sunday Times revealed that the Clinton administration was supporting the terrorist SPLA in order to ". destabilize the government of Sudan... More than $20m of military equipment, including radios, uniforms and tents will be shipped to Eritrea, Ethiopia and Uganda in the next few weeks. Although the equipment is earmarked for the armed forces of those countries, much of it will be passed on to the SPLA, which is preparing an offensive against the government in Khartoum." [The Sunday Times, 17th November 1996].

Such blatant support and funding by America for a terrorist movement was completely ignored by the western governments, even though it was being reported widely. The SPLA were freely waging tyranny by destroying mosques, tearing up of copies of the Qur'an as they did in Tawreet and targeting the centres for the memorization of the Noble Qur'an in Hamshkureeb. They organised the bombing of Muslims during Fajr prayer and chose the 27th Rajab, the day of Israa and Mi'raj, as the time of heightened aggression.

Yet amidst all this butchery and oppression, they constantly repeat the mantra that they are being oppressed due to the application of the laws of Islam, even though it is clear that such laws are not applied. They have declared that they will continue to fight until the Sudanese government abolishes the Islamic laws. All of this confirms the extent of their hidden hatred and their blatant hostility towards Islam and the Muslims. It also confirms these terrorist rebels are working in a crusader war against Islam, not only to kill Muslims but also to prevent the application of Islam.

The Americans have sponsored this terrorist movement in order to separate Sudan into two separate entities, the North and South, along ethnic and religious lines. This colonialist plan of divide and conquer has been a recurring style used by the western colonialists to facilitate their hegemony over the Muslim world. This policy has been used for many hundreds of years, and was a means to destroy the Islamic Khilafah through the funding and supporting of autonomous entities within the state, that were encouraged to rebel and separate. An example of this was the rebellion of ibn Saud with the help of the British, which led to the establishment of the Saudi regime in the land that was known as Hijaz - a wilayah of the Islamic Khilafah. More recent examples show the creation of Kashmir as a conflict zone, and the recent and ongoing attempts to carve up Iraq into three states; Sunni, Shia and Kurd. Such political manoeuvres have resulted in more than fifty ineffective entities in the Muslim world, where previously only one had existed.

The sponsorship of terrorists is actually quite a normal state of affairs for the American regime.
They were able to hire a terrorist militia in the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, which were used to fight and remove the Taliban. This occurred despite the wide spread atrocities being committed by the Northern Alliance.

The Guardian backed up this analogy by comparing the events in Sudan with US actions in South America,

"Welcome to the 1980s. Long live Ronald Reagan. Remember the scenario - a rebel group being trained and armed by the CIA to topple a sovereign government, cross-border incursions from secluded camps, and the whole de-stabilization exercise backed by international sanctions and a massive propaganda campaign. It sounds like Nicaragua or Angola circa 1984. In fact it's Sudan 1998." [The Guardian, 1 May 1998]

However, the government in Sudan is not without blame, rather, they have been complicit in the plans of the Americans. They have taken political actions which have led to the SPLA being granted political weight and clout, and have also agreed plans that would see Sudan split into two. The Sudanese governments oppression in Darfur, which they continue even today, is giving licence and credibility for international intervention. With such international focus growing, it will only be a matter of time when foreign troops move in, and Sudan is formally split into two.

Such is the complicated and devious nature of the America's political games. They stoke the fires of death and destruction, often when the enemy is no more than a puppet, in order to bring about a climate for political change, which they then fashion by their own hands under the guise of 'humanitarian intervention'.

The time has come for the Muslims to realize the true aims of the western world and the puppet regimes that preside over the Muslims on behalf of the West. The Muslim world must act to prevent its lands from being split ever further into oblivion, to the point that it poses no threat or resistance to any force on earth. The Muslims must realise that the secular political institutions that have been forced upon the Muslim lands, work only to serve the western aims. It is by calling for the implementation of the Islamic political system, and through Islamic politics, that Muslims have a future that will lead to the undoing of the 'divide and conquer' policies of the West.

The Prophet Muhammed (saw) indicated the importance and obligation of maintaining political unity in the Islamic world,

"Whoever comes to you, while your affairs are united under one man, and wishes to break your unity then kill him."

The Muslim world can only have a voice and a future by uniting under one Islamic political system, the Islamic Khilafah.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

click here to email a link to this article

2004-08-01 Sun 16:18ct