---------------------------------------------------------
Jamada al-thani 25, 1426/July 31, 2005 #59
---------------------------------------------------------
THOUGHT OF THE DAY:
July 30: CNN reported that 800,000 people are facing famine. 
Of these, 150,000 are children who could be facing death.
New Trend notices that the U.S. is waging a $1 billion A WEEK 
war in Iraq while this vast tragedy unfolds in Niger, from where, 
ironically, Bush claimed that President Saddam Hussain was 
obtaining URANIUM! for his yet-to-be-found WMDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jamaat al-Muslimeen News [I item]
POB 10881, Baltimore, MD 21234
Re-Sentencing of Seifullah Chapman and Masoud Khan was a farce
On July 29, 2005 Judge Brinkema, in a court in Alexandria, Virginia, 
re-sentenced Seifullah Chapman, Masoud Khan and Hammad Abdur-Raheem. 
The Judge is a kindly-looking old lady who claimed that the obscenely 
long sentences she had given to the three [whom the former attorney 
general labelled as the "Virginia Jihad Network (!)"] were "sticking 
in her craw."
So the three were called to court and she took off about one third 
of the sentences over which she said she had jurisdiction. The 
others she said were ordered under decree from Congress. At the 
end of the day, Seifullah and Masood were left with LIFE SENTENCES. 
One wonders why this farce of "re-sentencing" was carried out.
The only person who gained a little was Br. Hammad whose sentence 
was brought down from 8 years to 3 years. However, even three years 
is too much for person who did not do anything, did not travel 
anywhere, had no connections to any group. He has simply been made 
to suffer because he refused to work as a snitch for the 
government against other Muslims.
The situation of Br. Seifullah is tragic. He has childhood diabetes. 
He has been complaining to the authorities ever since he was 
imprisoned that his diabetes is getting worse but to no avail. 
Now that the Judge is convinced that he might actually lose a 
limb if not treated, she ordered that he be taken to a prison 
hospital and treated.
Seifullah Chapman is a "White" brother with golden hair. He is 
an idealist whom Islam made a whole man. Speaking in court, he 
said he has never committed any violence against anyone, and 
during his prison stay has never expressed anger towards anyone. 
He said he has forgiven the Judge and the prosecutors who claim 
he is a "terrorist." He served his country through his young 
life, even serving as a marine. But, he said, he is being 
punished because he has embraced Islam. [His father is reported 
to have offered to pay for his trial attorney if he would give 
up Islam and work in his liquor store. He refused without hesitation.]
Masoud Khan seemed to be most cognizant about the fact that there 
is no justice for Muslims here. He addressed the court for less 
than a minute.
According to Mr. Jonathan Shapiro, Masaud's attorney, "there 
is no question as to the harshness of the penalty. Mr. Khan's 
Section 924(c) sentences apart from the 360 month guideline's 
sentence, are a consecutive life plus 35 years as the result 
of mandatory minimum sentences. " ... "The sentencing inquiry 
concerns the Section 924(c) counts only -- and the draconian 
mandatory minimum sentences those offenses warranted."
Judge Brinkema had the opportunity to reduce these sentences to 
one day if she preferred. She has instead reduced Masaud's 
sentence from 360 months to 10 years, leaving the sentence as 
life in prison WITHOUT PAROLE, plus 35 years. She suggested 
she cannot address the gun counts and that the 4th Circuit 
Court of Appeals must address that issue. If the 4th Circuit 
reduces the 35 years to less, Masaud will still remain with 
a life sentence.
Masaud's statement in court:
Bismillah -- All Praises Are Due to Allah, the Most Merciful
I wasn't going to give this short statement here today, but 
decided that as I should never despair from my Lord's Mercy, 
I should likewise never despair from enjoining what is justly 
right and forbidding what is unjustly wrong.
Truly Our Lord is oft-forgiving and Merciful and in this short 
life provides ample opportunities to turn to Him and correct 
our affairs before it is too late.
I, therefore, enjoin upon myself and everyone to fear God as 
He should rightly be feared and to know that God is swift in 
responding to the supplications of the oppressed.
I have come to realize that it is truly through trial and 
hardship that one comes to know and love his Creator. I can 
therefore honestly say that in this blessing of hardship, I am 
not the one who has been hurt, but sadly, those who have brought 
on this injustice have only hurt themselves.
In closing I would like to say thank you again [to the 
Community and our supporters] for everyone's ongoing 
support for us and others. May God protect and reward them abundantly.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Letter: Re: Badawi's blunders about the Qur'an and Jihad.
BROTHER KAUKAB, ASSALAM UN ALAIKUM. MA'SA'ALLAH, WHAT A USEFUL ARTICLE.  
I'LL BE MAILING COPIES TO SOME PEOPLE.
IQBAL YUNUS KHAN
Toronto
-------------------------------------------------
Book Received:
Radicals, Rabbis and Peacemakers. Conversations with Jewish Critics 
of Israel by Seth Farber, 252 pages, published in 2005, $19.95. 
Available from: 
www.commoncouragepress.com
Highly praised by Prof. M. Shahid Alam, Northeastern University, 
Boston. To be reviewed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-Eyed Fatwa Issued by Lackeys of Bush: It Distorts the Qur'an, 
negates the Oneness of Humanity & Undermines the Unity of the 
Muslim Ummah
by 
Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D
On July 28, 2005 a Fatwa [religious ruling] was issued by some 
flunkeys of the U.S. government which is being publicized worldwide 
by the Zionist-controlled media as an "Islamic Ruling or Fatwa." 
The Fatwa mongers ignored the fact that Islam sees humanity as 
one and within it emphasizes the unity of the Muslim Ummah. 
If this Fatwa had condemned terrorism carried out by the 
U.S.-UK-Israel too as part of its message, perhaps my analysis 
would have come out differently. As a Muslim, I cannot ignore 
the worldwide suffering of my people and focus only on the 
suffering in UK.
I will look at three aspects of the Fatwa:
- 
Does this Fatwa have any foundation in the Qur'an and the 
authentic Hadith of the Prophet, pbuh.
 
- 
Does this Fatwa have any basis in the Islamic worldview about 
humanity at large and the Muslim Ummah [worldwide community] 
in particular?
 
- 
The serious harm it can do to the Muslims of America and an 
understanding of why the Zionist-controlled media are publicizing it.
 
- 
The Fatwa mongers have quoted a verse of the Qur'an as the 
foundation of their Fatwa as follows :
"The Qur'an, Islam's revealed text, states: "Whoever kills a 
person [unjustly]……it is as though he has killed all mankind. 
And whoever saves a life, it is as though he had saved all 
mankind." (Qur''an, 5:32)
First thing to note is that the Fatwa mongers have done serious 
harm to this verse on three counts:
- 
This verse has NOTHING WHATEVER to do with Jihad or terrorism or 
even war in general.
 
- 
The CONTEXT of the verse has been left out otherwise the 
irrelevance of the claim being made by the Fatwa mongers 
would have become clear.
 
- 
KEY WORDS in the verse have been left out which would have 
destroyed the case being made by the Fatwa group.
 
This is the text of the verse:
"On that account We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any 
one slew a person - unless it be for for murder or for spreading 
mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people. 
And if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life 
of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our 
messengers with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of 
them continued to commit excesses in the land." [5:32]
As any good Muslim would knows, deliberately leaving words out of 
the Qur'an to make it fit one's design is a deadly sin which 
disqualifies anyone from issuing a Fatwa in the name of Islam.
Secondly, the Fatwa mongers left out its context. This verse is 
about the story of Cain and Abel [though the names are not give 
in the Qur'an] which begins with 5:27. It is about sibling 
rivary and jealousy which can lead to killing. Metaphorically 
killing in person-to-person relationship is being described 
as killing of all humanity, as is saving one life like 
saving all humanity.
The Qur'an is telling us that such was the decree for "the 
Children of Israel." This is not Islamic Law which considers 
the killing of one person as ONE COUNT OF MURDER only and 
not the killing of all humanity.
Only people who have no knowledge of Islam would quote this 
verse related to Jihad, terrorism or war. The Qur'an teaches 
killing by way of Jihad; hence it is absurd to claim that 
killing per se is not permitted.
In fact, this verse goes against the segments of the Jews 
[like the Zionist Jews in our time] about whom it says "many 
of them continued to commit excesses in the land." As these 
people who issued the Fatwa are the friends of Israel, 
they simply OMITTED the clear references to the Jews!
As for retaliation for "murder or for spreading mischief in 
the land" killing is not only allowed in Islam but is part of 
Islamic law. Again our "sages" quietly left it out of the verse.
 
- 
I call the Fatwa of these lackeys a "one-eyed" Fatwa because 
it conveniently leaves out the ONENESS of HUMANITY and the 
UNITY of the MUSLIM UMMAH [worldwide community] which are 
absolutely fundamental to Islam. These persons, cowards that 
they are, do not mention the terrorism which has been 
DIRECTED AT THE MUSLIM WORLD by Bush and Blair. I find it 
difficult to believe that the Fatwa mongers are Muslims when 
they have ignored these facts:
- 
The slaughter of 100,000 people in Iraq by the U.S.-British 
air forces [according to Lancet magazine], plus the slow 
death of ONE MILLION Iraqis during the sanctions imposed by 
the U.S.-U.K-Israel through the U.N. [These are UN figures.]
 
- 
The holocaust of tens of thousands of Afghan civilians by the 
U.S.-British air forces.
 
- 
The genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel with the 
support of International Jewry.
 
- 
The mass terrorism of the Kashmiri people, including the rape 
of thousands of women as a weapon of terror, by the Indian army. 
[Instead we find the Indian Prime Minister being welcomed to 
the White House by Bush without a peep from these Fatwa mongers.]
 
- 
The genocide of the people of Chechnia by the Russians and 
the slaughter of ONE THOUSAND unarmed Uzbeks in ONE DAY. 
[Both regimes are staunch allies of the U.S. in its "war on terror." 
Terror is a code word they use for Islam.
 
While issuing this Fatwa, the lackeys forgot that Muslims can 
still read the Qur'an and it says: "The believers are but one 
brotherhood {sisterhood]: so make peace between your brothers: 
and fear Allah that ye may receive Mercy."
Not only these Fatwa mongers forgot the Qur'an, they ignored all 
that is sacred in Islam when they kept their mouths shut when 
AFGHANISTAN was BOMBED DURING RAMADAN and people praying Tarawih 
were missiled in their mosque. in Iraq, FALLUJAH was WIPED OUT 
house by house, and mosque by mosque during Ramadan. Even during 
the nights of Lailatul Qadr, the bombing and killing of Muslims 
continued at the hands of U.S. air force and marines. There was 
not a peep out of these cowardly Fatwa mongers. On what basis 
can they claim to be Muslims?
This Fatwa is racist because it has been issued in response to 
the attacks in London. Thus if the English are killed, it is 
a matter of great concern, but if Iraqis, Afghans, Kashmiris, 
Chechens, Uzbeks, Sudanese, Somalis and Palestinians are killed, 
no Fatwa is issued. [In fact, I would say that these people 
would not DARE to issue a Fatwa about the suffering of Muslims 
if the victimizers are USA-UK-Israel.] This is RACISM and 
PATRIOTISM of a very narrow kind [which a scholar described 
as "the last refuge of the scoundrel."]
 
- 
Who are these people who issued the Fatwa? They are basically long 
time supporters of the U.S. government from subservient 
organizations like ISNA, ICNA and their offshoots. A few of 
them should be mentioned by name: Qazwini is a Shi'ite who has 
a $14 million mosque in Michigan. He is on the record as saying 
that the U.S. occupation of Iraq is "liberation." He is an 
enthusiastic visitor to the White House. He claims to be Shia, 
but he is of the Kufan type, those who invited Imam Husain, r.a., 
but then betrayed him. Qazwini was silent when U.S. tanks were 
rampaging through Najaf. Badawi, as we have shown before, 
blatantly tried to distort the meaning and significance of 
Jihad in the Qur'an. He is a violator of the Qur'an. 
Taha Jabir al-Alawani was involved in an earlier notorious 
"fatwa" by which he and ISNA/CAIR etc tried to justify bloc 
voting for Bush, only one of the disasters these people have 
inflicted on the Muslims of America. Zulfiqar is from ICNA and 
known for his ignorance of Islamic behavior. Some of the 
signatories may be innocent victims of this clique.
This Fatwa is simply the work of agents of U.S. policies working 
in 4 letter organizations coming forth in the guise of 
"Islamic scholars."
This Fatwa could become what the Star of David was allegedly for 
the Jews under Hitler. These people have managed to put together 
a list of mosques which they claim support their Fatwa. This 
would mean that the 2500 mosques which have not signed on to 
this Fatwa can now be targeted as "not opposing terrorism." 
This is a way of telling the Zionists which mosques not to hit. 
These are the "protected" mosques connected to the Fatwa, duly listed, 
so that pressure can be exerted on the mosques which did not sign up 
to "do so or else." 
These Fatwa mongers have not defined "terrorism" or "extremism," 
the two key terms thay have used. Thus one who attacks Zionist 
forces in Israel or Kashmir can be deemed a terrorist by these 
agents, or one who prays a lot in addition to the obligatory 
prayers can be called an extremist.
 
CONCLUSION: This is a ONE-EYED Fatwa, which looks at the world 
from the point of view of the oppressor and ignores the totality 
of humanity. The Prophet Muhammad, pbuh, spoke about the ONE-EYED 
DECEIVER [Dajjal]. Here we have Dajjal projecting his viewpoint 
through people who claim to be Muslims and who pray and fast. 
The messenger of Allah pinpointed the master of these Fatwa 
mongers when he said:
" From Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, r.a.: The messenger of Allah, pbuh, 
stood among the people and gave praise to Allah which is His 
due and spoke of Dajjal. He (the Prophet) said: I warn you 
against the coming of Dajjal, and there has not been a prophet 
who did not warn against Dajjal but I will put it to you in a 
way in which they did not: That is: DAJJAL is ONE-EYED and 
ALLAH IS NOT ONE-EYED. [ Sahih of Bukhari, kitabul fitan.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Texts of 2 Zionist Attacks on Dr. Siddique
As-salaam alaikom/greetings, 
Here we go again, another Dr. Tony Martin/Ward 
Churchill/Amiri Baraka. When will the zionists learn 
that censorship and slander of dissenters will get 
them nowhere?
To read Dr. Siddique's reply, go to:
http://www.newtrendmag.org
(Click on Issue No. 145)
-Nadrat
http://www.cnsnews.com/SpecialReports/archive/200507/SPE20050712a.html
Jihad-Supporting Prof Calls US 'Great Deceiver'
By Sherrie Gossett
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
July 12, 20
(CNSNews.com) - A journalism professor at Lincoln 
University in Pennsylvania, who previously described 
the United States as the "Great Deceiver," is criticizing 
the "attempt to involve U.S. Muslims in London 
guilt," a reference to the July 7 terrorist attacks in 
England that killed at least 52 people and may have been 
the work of al Qaeda.
Dr. Kaukab Siddique, who also teaches English at the 
university named for Abraham Lincoln, is warning 
readers in his New Trend online magazine not to try to 
"appease the people in power by subservience, or 
'uncle tomming.'"
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), one 
of the most vocal Muslim advocacy groups in the U.S., 
has sent condolences to the British people for the 
train and bus bombings that left 700 people wounded. 
CAIR also sent a delegation to meet with the British 
ambassador to the U.S. on July 8.
However, Siddique chided CAIR and the U.S. for not 
sending sympathies to Iraqi cities that were bombed or 
Afghans who were subjected to what he described as the 
American "reign of terror."
Apologies related to the London bombings are damaging 
to the self-respect and dignity of American Muslims 
because they imply that all Muslims are responsible, 
according to Siddique.
For Muslims who are "depressed" over CAIR's call to 
"kow tow to the embassy of an aggressive military power, 
which has occupation forces in two Muslim countries," 
Siddique offers the following advice: don't break the 
law, know your rights, pray, and if depression persists, go 
clean the bathroom at the local mosque.
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon 
Wiesenthal Center, called Siddique's comments "beyond 
shocking" and "mind-boggling." Noting that New Trend 
Magazine also has a London address, Cooper wondered 
whether Siddique was "embracing the goal of the people 
who did this (London bombings).
"Where's the outrage?" Cooper asked. "These statements 
supply an insight into someone who cannot bring 
himself to condemn terrorism. Human instinct is to cry 
out against such outrages, but he's telling people to 
go clean the toilet."
Siddique has published controversial commentary on 
Jews, the Holocaust and armed jihad. As a leader of 
Jamaat al-Muslimeen (the Islamic People's Movement) 
International, Siddique has delivered some of these 
messages at mosques.
Siddique has authored a booklet that referred to 
America as the "Dajjâl," a term that is variously 
translated by Muslims as either the "Antichrist" or 
"Great Deceiver." Siddique has argued that previous 
Muslim efforts to link Israel to the anti-Christ were 
wrong, that the United States had to be the 
anti-Christ since it was providing Israel with so much 
financial assistance.
He has also labeled the U.S. the "Evil Empire" of our 
age. "Muslims must engage in jihad to defeat Dajjâl," 
he wrote, adding:
"The ideas of guerilla warfare, denial of easy occupation 
to the enemy, and ability to use small weapons should be 
made available to every Muslim."
On a New Trend webpage dedicated to three female 
suicide bombers, Zionism is equated with "systematic 
genocide" and readers are urged to support a boycott 
of "major supporters of Zionism," including McDonald's, 
Coca Cola, Starbucks, Home Depot and Disney.
The Nazi concentration camp at Auschwitz is 
categorized as a "Jewish milk cow" by Siddique, 
which has "netted billions of dollars for Israel, 
owing to the pity it creates for Jews who run that 
terrorist entity."
While Siddique has publicly insisted that he does not 
oppose Jews "as a collective," a recent issue of New Trend 
warned that Jews today are the most powerful, the 
wealthiest and the most oppressive people in the world.
American Jews are among the "powerful negative forces" 
subverting freedom in the U.S., Siddique wrote. They 
control the media through a network of "communications 
experts and entertainers," such as Larry King, Ted 
Koppel, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. Also listed 
were the Washington Post, the New York Times and 
producers for the CBS News program, "60 Minutes."
Jews are also in control of international banking as 
well as the Bush administration, according to New Trend.
Within the pages of New Trend, Siddique has offered 
support for scholars Ernst Zundel and David Irving, 
who are among the most prominent writers denying that 
the Jewish Holocaust occurred. New Trend contends 
there is no evidence Jews were gassed and credits 
Irving with being "able to help people see the REAL 
Hitler, rather than the devil incarnate the victors 
have made him out to be."
Cooper, from the Wiesenthal Center, admitted that 
Siddique is "honest, open and it's all here on his 
website for all to read." But he added that Siddique 
is "a bigot, an anti-Semite and a Holocaust denier. 
He shows more concern for the goals -- if not the 
operational aspects -- of Islamic terrorists rather 
than to the innocent victims of terror."
The American Association of University Professors 
(AAUP) defended Siddique Monday when contacted by 
Cybercast News Service.
Jonathan Knight, director of academic freedom for the 
AAUP, argued that "however unpopular or distasteful 
the views of professors are, their freedom to express 
them is an essential condition of a truly free 
institution.
"What may be desirable is one thing. What is 
punishable is another," Knight said. He added that 
there was no evidence Siddique's views had entered 
his classroom at Lincoln University.
"If he had somewhat less radical ideas that gave 
someone offense, he would not be subject to 
admonishment either," Knight said.
Lincoln University, a historically black college 50 
miles outside of Philadelphia, honors the "Great Emancipator," 
America's 16th president. Numerous African-American leaders, 
including the late Supreme Court justice 
Thurgood Marshall and the late poet and author 
Langston Hughes, were students at the school.
Neither Siddique, nor anyone at Lincoln University, 
responded to Cybercast News Service requests for 
comment for this article.
http://www.cnsnews.com/Nation/Archive/200507/NAT20050714a.html
Jewish Groups Urge Condemnation of Muslim Prof's Statements
By Sherrie Gossett
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
July 14, 2005
(CNSNews.com) - Jewish human rights groups are urging 
officials at Pennsylvania's Lincoln University to condemn the 
statements of a professor who has expressed support 
for an armed jihad against the West and skepticism 
about the World War II Jewish Holocaust.
Cybercast News Service reported Tuesday on the 
controversial statements made by Dr. Kaukab Siddique, 
a professor of English and journalism at the 
predominantly black Lincoln University in Chester 
County, Pa.
Siddique's remarks were published in his online web 
magazine called New Trend. The magazine argues that 
the Holocaust never happened but has been used as a 
billion-dollar "cash cow" for Jews.
Another passage from Siddique's magazine contradicts 
that view. "If the Jews were the chosen people, Allah 
would not have sent the holocaust on them under 
Hitler."
Jews maintain a stranglehold on media, big business, 
universities and the Pentagon, New Trend warns. One of 
the cyber magazine's pages is dedicated to three 
female suicide bombers and urges reader to boycott 
supporters of "Zionism," including Disneyland, 
Starbucks, Coca Cola, Home Depot, McDonalds, Sara Lee, 
Estee Lauder and Timberland.
The professor supports armed jihad, but he complains 
that westerners often fail to place such jihad in an 
appropriate context. The situations in which armed 
jihad is allowed, Siddique explains, include 
self-defense, fighting for the honor of women, 
fighting in defense of Muslim lands and fighting 
against cultural imperialism, which he argues is 
dedicated to desecrating and destroying places and 
items considered holy by Muslims.
Muslims participating in jihad simply want their 
homelands to be free, he insists. "In no case are 
Muslims permitted to accept slavery and 
oppression."
Siddique has written articles for other publications 
and has spoken to student groups on other college 
and university campuses, where he distributes 
copies of his newsletter.
Following publication of Tuesday's Cybercast News 
Service report, Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean 
of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, sent a 
letter to Lincoln University President Ivory Nelson, 
asking him to review Siddique's website and to 
"publicly condemn [Siddique's] hatred and bigotry."
Cooper's letter states in part: "[Siddique's] website 
attacks other Muslims expressing solidarity with the 
victims of the London Bombing outrages, embraces 
prominent bigots and racists who deny the WWII 
Nazi Holocaust and equates Zionism with Racism, 
while accusing Israel of Genocide."
Nelson has not responded to Cooper's letter, which was 
forwarded to Michael Hill, vice president of development and 
external communications at the university. Hill on 
Tuesday told Cybercast News Service that "Lincoln 
University does not comment on the personal activities 
of its faculty." He refused further comment.
That response, said Cooper, is "absolutely shocking." 
He added that "there's a complete lack of moral 
clarity here" on the part of Lincoln University. 
"What kind of message does this send to the student body?"
The university could acknowledge the professor's 
freedom of speech, Cooper argued, while at the same 
time expressing disagreement with and disassociation 
from the statements made by Siddique. Referring to the 
recent London bombings, Cooper said: "If you can't 
speak out at a time like this, then we're in trouble."
Yehudit Barsky, director of the Division on Middle 
East and International Terrorism at the American 
Jewish Committee in New York City, said Lincoln 
University has a responsibility to repudiate 
Siddique's remarks and to make sure that Siddique's 
views do not reflect those of the university.
"If a professor had made remarks supporting the Ku 
Klux Klan, it's clear we would see Lincoln distancing 
themselves from the remarks," Barsky said.
"Once someone gets into Holocaust revisionism, it's 
clear the person has become a hatemonger," added 
Muslim author Stephen Schwartz, director of the Center 
for Islamic Pluralism.
While free speech is an important component of an 
academic environment, Schwartz said Lincoln University 
has an interest in maintaining "good order" on the 
campus and should therefore "monitor Siddique's 
statements and activities closely to see he does not 
transgress his contract."
The American Association of University Professors has 
defended Siddique, saying "however unpopular or 
distasteful the views of professors are, their freedom 
to express them is an essential condition of a truly 
free institution."
--
Nadrat Siddique
email: siddiqu1@umbc.edu
I believe in life.
And i have seen the death parade
march through the torso of the earth,
sculpting mud bodies in its path.
I have seen the destruction of the daylight,
and seen bloodthirsty maggots
prayed to and saluted.
I have been locked by the lawless.
Handcuffed by the haters.
Gagged by the greedy.
And, if i know any thing at all,
it's that a wall is just a wall
and nothing more at all.
It can be broken down.
(from "Affirmation," by Assata Shakur)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
click here to email
 
a link to this 
article
2005-07-31 Sun 20:03ct
NewTrendMag.org