[Biggest 
Islamic 
web site in the 
U.S.]
P.O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21087.
Phone: 410-435-5000.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are not necessarily 
shared by editorial committee.
Responses (positive or negative) up to 250 words are welcome.
Names will be withheld on request.
--------------------------------------------
Reporting and Analysis
The 
U.S. 
- Saudi Relationship and al-Qaida's 
Attack in Riyadh
Adel al-Jubeir, Foreign Policy Advisor to Crown 
Prince Abdullah Speaks
On May 16, 2003 Saudi ruler, Crown Prince 
Abdullah's Foreign Policy 
Adviser, Adel al-Jubeir, spoke at length to the 
assembled U.S. 
media 
representatives at the Saudi embassy in 
Washington, DC. He made important 
points about the relationship between the U.S. 
and the Saudi government in 
great detail. He was well dressed in suit and 
tie, spoke good English with a 
slight accent, and used idiom familiar to 
Americans.
Owing to criticism of Saudi Arabia in the 
U.S. 
media, 
particularly 
after the attack in Riyadh, al-Jubeir disclosed 
information which Saudi 
officials do not usually reveal about the 
Saudi-U.S. relationship.
Al-Jubeir's presentation, followed by 
questions and answers, was 
telecast live and uncut on 
C-Span 
and then 
repeated twice later in the day. 
Here are the main points:
1. A solid military relationship exists between 
the U.S. and the Saudi 
Arabian regime
2. The U.S. and the Saudis share intelligence and 
access to suspects.
3. CIA 
Director Tenet is fully satisfied with the 
Saudi cooperation with the 
U.S. in both intelligence and access to suspects.
4. There is TOTAL cooperation between the U.S. 
and the Saudis against 
"terrorism,"
5. An average of a DOZEN communications take 
place every day between the two 
regarding intelligence on terrorism.
6. Both the Saudis and the U.S. are the targets 
of "terrorism."
7. The last month alone, the Saudis have 
questioned "thousands" of suspects, 
have HUNDREDS of people in detention, and of 
these one hundred have been put 
on trial.
8. The Saudi government froze Osama bin Laden's 
assets in the ‘90s and since 
9.11 
numerous bank accounts of "suspects" have 
been frozen.
9. Al-Qaida is challenging the LEGITIMACY of the 
Saudi regime. It is an 
"existential" struggle. The Saudi regime is on 
the side of "modernity," 
"innovation" and "education" while al-Qaida wants 
to take people back to the 
"dark ages."
10. Al-Qaida is not a conventional organization; 
it's a mind set with 
clusters of cells working autonomously.
11. The common link between the "terrorists" who 
are carrying out the attacks 
is 
"AFGHANISTAN 
- 
CHECHNYA 
- BOSNIA."
12. We [here al-Jubeir identified the Saudi mind 
set] "as Arabs and as 
bedouins" cannot tolerate attacks on our 
"guests."
13. President Saleh of Yemen deserves great 
praise for his complete 
cooperation in the 
war against "terrorism."
14. We are carrying out "modernization" projects 
and will even hold 
"elections" if necessary to increase 
participation in our system
15. Saudi government is giving funds to "Islamic 
charities" in the U.S. There 
is nothing wrong here because these are 
"legitimate."
16. The case of Mr. Faqihi, the Saudi accountant 
in Berlin, has been 
overblown. [He answered this in detail.] He had 
just given a couple of 
hundred dollars for a fast breaking ceremony and 
his business card was found 
with someone who was a suspect in Germany.
17. In our religion, to kill one person, it is as 
if one killed all of 
humanity; hence we are against 
terrorism.
[Other than the word "terrorists," the words 
within quotation marks are Mr. 
Jubeir's.]
ANALYSIS by the Editor
What Mr. Al-Jubeir left out of his 
presentation is probably more 
important than what he said. He did not point out 
that in ISLAM there IS NO 
MONARCHY. Only Caliphate based on the people's 
consultation and consent is 
permitted. Hence, Islamically the Saudi regime is 
illegitimate.
Arabia should not be called "Saudi Arabia." 
In Islam, the land belongs 
to Allah and the Saudi family has no right to 
name the land of the Prophet's 
(pbuh) birth after its family name. Inheritance 
of power from father to son 
or other relatives (hereditary rule) is strictly 
forbidden in Islam and 
Muslim history is the history of the people 
trying to overthrow such rule.
The Saudi monarchy has squandered the 
wealth of Arabia: Much of it is 
now in Chase Manhattan Bank. This use of the 
people's wealth as if it belongs 
to the family of Saud is in direct violation of 
the Qur'an, 
the Hadith 
and 
the example of the 
Sahaba 
(companions of the 
Prophet).
Mr. Jubeir admitted that U.S. troops had 
come to Arabia at the 
invitation of the Saudis. Again, this makes the 
regime illegitimate because 
the Qur'an has forbidden such presence in the 
land of the Prophet (pbuh).
Most observers agree that the Riyadh 
attack was a well planned attack 
meant to show two things:
1. That there is an integral military 
alliance between the U.S. and the 
Saudis. The targets were the people who make the 
Saudi security apparatus 
viable and capable of crushing the uprising of 
the Arabian people.
2. That the Saudi government, given the 
choice between Islam and 
America, will choose America.
CAN Al-QAIDA SUCCEED IN TOPPLING the 
SAUDIS through SUCH ATTACKS?
Where the attackers and the oppressed 
majority share the same faith and 
aspirations, there is a chance that "terrorism" 
can be effective. But in the 
case of Al-Qaida, it might not work.
In  modern times, "terrorism" was 
effectively used first by the 
guerrillas of Mao Tse Dong. For instance, Mao 
knew that the villagers of 
China were terrified of the power of landlords. 
The villagers thought that 
the landlords were so well-armed and powerful 
that the situation could never 
change. [Often the way out for such villagers was 
to take opium and drop out 
of any efforts at change.]
Mao took some drastic measures. His forces 
struck suddenly at a number 
of villages, captured the main landlords in a few 
villages and strung them up 
in the village square. Thus the mind set the 
villagers had about the 
invincibility of the landlords was shattered and 
a general uprising began. 
The people could see the "super" men hanging in 
the village square.
Al-Qaida seems to be giving the same kind of 
treatment to the symbols of 
American power. The difference is that America's 
power is much more than that 
of any landlord. Al-Qaida has to sacrifice its 
best fighters to be able to 
get to the Americans and then seldom succeeds.
There is ANOTHER REASON WHY al-Qaida CANNOT 
succeed at this stage. The 
U.S. has planted well armed LOCAL MERCENARY 
FORCES within each country it 
controls. The financial and socio-economic 
interests of these local forces 
are the same as those of the U.S. power 
structure. Thus they see any attack 
on American interests as an attack on themselves. 
As Mr. Adel Al-Jubeir said 
so eloquently about the U.S.-Saudi regime 
relationship:
"We are ONE. We are IN THE SAME BOAT ...." 
"We will fight them whatever 
the cost...."
The problem Al-Qaida faces is that the 
Muslim masses, though fired up 
against America, owing to 
Palestine, 
Afghanistan, 
Iraq, 
are basically 
PEACEFUL people. In Saudi Arabia, they will make 
hot speeches or their 
leaders will give fatwas. In PAKISTAN they will 
come out on the streets and 
demonstrate. If the masses come out strongly 
against the rulers, the local 
mercenary forces will crush them, AS HAPPENED IN 
ALGERIA EVEN AFTER THE 
ISLAMISTS HAD WON THE ELECTIONS.
The Muslim MASSES are UNARMED and 
PEACEFUL. The rulers are HEAVILY 
armed. Hence an al-Qaida attack cannot lead to an 
uprising of the people.
Al-Qaida's role seems to be to remove the 
FEAR and AWE of America from 
the hearts of the Muslim masses. Its attacks also 
make the Muslim masses 
aware of their HELPLESSNESS. That is a painful 
kind of awakening but it is an 
awakening. The Muslims masses are beginning to 
realize that they can 
demonstrate PEACEFULLY in their MILLIONS from 
Morocco to 
Sudan, 
to Pakistan, 
to Bangladesh to 
Indonesia, 
but peaceful means 
could not (and did not) avert 
an attack on Iraq. 
Earlier Afghanistan was bombed during 
Ramadan 
and 
the masses of the Muslim 
world could only watch in horror. Is it 
surprising that most Muslims rejoiced 
on learning that Osama bin Laden (probably) 
survived the horrific bombing of 
Tora Bora, the like of which the world has never 
seen, numerous 
atom-bomb-like explosions dotting the Islamic 
land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003-05-17 Sat 13:28ct