NewTrendMag.org
 
News
 # 
1332
[
Click on NEWS for back issues
][
OUR BOOKS
][
Previous Issue
]
Rabi' al-Thani 30,1431/ April 15, 2010 # 16
Latest Israeli desecration of a masjid. 
Please scroll down.
President Obama is ignoring his key constituency as he goes 
"right.". See Dr. Wilmer Leon's analysis below.
Two important reports from Africa: A Mauritanian Muslim was 
in GTMO for 9 years. Totally innocent. Was cited as top 
al-Al-Qaida!
Somali mujahideen surging. 
Please scroll way down.
From Imam Badi Ali [National Shoora leader], Jamaat 
al-Muslimeen North Carolina
Spotlight #1: Do not compare the Qur'an with other books. 
It's like comparing God with man!
Spotlight # 2: These explorations of outer space, the 
instruments sent to the moon, the scouting of Mars, do not 
make sense. What's the point of space travel when we are 
busy dropping huge bombs, missiles and explosives on the 
planet earth? Is this anything other than ego tripping and 
display of power?
Spotlight #3: Muslim elites do not realize that without 
clear objectives they cannot progess. What do these Muslims 
want? They don't realize that they have enemies who want the 
destruction of Islam and Muslims. In fact if Islam did not 
have enemies, it would not be the Truth. Look at the 
confusion of Muslim leaders about Jerusalem. Instead of 
preparing to liberate it, they want talks which do not and 
cannot lead anywhere.
Notes from Jamaat al-Muslimeen Anti-Zionist movement;
Boycott Businesses which Support Israel. Among them:
1. Nestle
2. starbucks
3. Coca Cola
4. McDonald's
5. Disney
6. Home Depot
7. Estee Lauder
8. All KOSHER items.
9. Arm-and-Hammer
10. Sara Lee
Muslim Demonstrators at the Anti-War Rally in Washington DC 
in memory of the tragic US invasion of Iraq. [Photo by 
N.]
US-backed Pakistan Regime Admits Mass Murder in Bombing 
Raids on April 10
[From New Trend's Monitor of Urdu language media]
April 14, 2010: The Pakistani government has admitted that 
on April 10 the PAF [Pakistan Air Force] bombed peaceful 
villages in the Khyber Agency killing 71 civilians who had 
no connection with Islamic "militants."  After the first 
bombing raid, when rescuers were removing the rubble, a 
second wave of Pakistani jets attacked, killing all the 
rescuers. Some of those killed and wounded were recruits in 
the Pakistani paramilitary force FC and the government is 
giving their relatives cash handouts of $125,000 each 
received from the US.
Jamaate Islami Leader Sirajul Haq Condemns Bombing: Visits 
Families of Victims
Photo below: Sirajul Haq, Deputy Ameer of Jamaate Islami 
addressing families and relatives of the bereaved.
Sirajul Haq said that it is unprecedented in Muslim history 
that the air force bombs Pakistan's own people and then does 
not even apologize. He said the bombers did not spare  the 
funeral of the victims. He said that this is a deliberate 
policy of genocide aimed at alienating the people and 
turning them against Pakistan.
Afghanistan: Latest [3 items from New Trend monitor]
Martyrdom Operator Hits British "Project" in Kandahar City: 
Brits Wiped Out
April 15, 2010. A Taliban mujahid blew up a new British 
project in a heavy security area of Kandahar city. Seven 
Brits were killed and several others wounded. [Reuters 
report.] The nature of the "project" has not been revealed. 
The explosion was huge and was heard miles away.
Germans Lose daylong Battle with Taliban
April 15: In the northern province of Baghlan, mujahideen 
battled German armored units, killing 4 elite German troops 
and wounding 5. There were no Taliban losses. Germany 
admitted its loss.
US Military Admits Defeat in the Korengal Area of Kunar 
Province
April 15: According to AFP, the US military admitted that it 
has withdrawn from the rugged Korengal area of Kunar 
province. It's a strategically important area bordering 
Pakistan which will allow the Taliban free access to its 
supporters among the Pakistani people.
The retreat happened after a steady series of Taliban 
mujahideen attacks which kept the Americans awake around the 
clock.
The Taliban are ecstatic and have issued these 
statements:
"The Taliban, the main insurgent group that controls several 
districts in southern and eastern parts of the country, were 
quick to seize on the US withdrawal, after years of fierce 
fighting in the sparsely populated valley.
"It's a great victory for us," Taliban spokesman Zabihullah 
Mujahed told AFP by telephone from an undisclosed 
location.
"The area is very, very important for us. Its mountains 
provide us a good hideout, it can be used as a training 
ground and lead our operations across the region from 
there," he said.
"US troops fled under our constant attacks."
Why are the Taliban seen as saviors of Afghanistan?
Widespread Child Molestation & Homosexuality by 
NATO-supported Karzai-Shi'ite-Communist Forces Fanning 
Hatred of the Occupation
[New Trend thanks a reader in Iowa for sending us this 
important report. The sarcastic comments in the introduction 
are by the sender,  followed by the actual report. It will 
be difficult to blame the Taliban if they hang or behead all 
these miscreants after trial by Islamic courts.  Notice that 
Ahmed Rasheed, the Pakistani Islam hater, turned the 
American public against Mullah Omar by reporting that the 
Islamic leader had executed a child rapist and ordered the 
same for all homosexual criminals.. Editor] [Published only 
for education and information of the American public.  Ed.] 
[Emphasis in red by our reader.]
[Notice how the American Shi'ite who wrote the Kite Runner 
totally distorted the reality of Afghanistan. He tried to 
blame the Taliban and went to the extent of saying that they 
are the same as the Nazis. America's Zionists have turned 
the Kite Runner into a best seller!  -Ed.]
The joys that the Western Democracies brought back to 
Afghanistan after such civilized practices had been banned 
and its modernizing "moderate" practitioners  had been hung, 
crucified or stoned to death by the savage Sharia following 
"Moozlem fundamentalist terrorists" known as the Taliban. 
The first thing that the civilizing democracies do when they 
conquer a benighted savage Moozlem country is that they 
bring to power enlightened groups like pedophiles, 
prostitutes, pimps, thugs, gangsters and other such lights 
of humanity. These are the moderate and modernizing people 
that the savage Mullahs and followers of Sharia are always  
killing and persecuting. The problem is the savage beast 
like mentality of the Moozlems and their primitive religion 
that they can never appreciate these people, and resort to 
resistance and terrorism against them, instead of feeling 
thankful, and acting grateful. They must be taught, on the 
point of a gun if necessary to love and hug the predators 
who prey on them. That will civilize them.
http://original.antiwar.com/vlahos/2010/04/12/a-deal-with-th-devil/
The Rape of the Afghan Boys
by Kelley B. Vlahos, April 13, 2010
We talk about the possibility of losing the war in 
Afghanistan, but what if we lose our soul in 
Afghanistan?
Indirectly, Frontline will be asking that very question on 
April 20 with an underground report on the resurgence of 
bacha bazi or "boy play" among the wealthiest and most 
powerful men in northern Afghanistan. It's the pustule 
threatening to burst all over the righteousness of our 
humanitarian effort there, and just the tip of the sick fact 
of how poor Afghan children are systematically used, abused, 
and tossed away by the ruling elite and even Afghan soldiers 
living, training, and fighting alongside our own.
Bacha bazi is an old Afghan tradition of taking young boys, 
dressing them up like girls, and making them perform for 
older men in tea rooms, weddings, and other private venues. 
The boys are "owned" by single or married men who trade or 
keep the boys as concubines. According to reports, the boys' 
ages range from eight to 19, when they "age out" of the 
practice and are released.
"The bacha dancers are often abused children whose families 
have rejected them," said the Guardian's Ghaith Abdul-Ahad, 
who wrote about the practice in September. He described one 
boy who was sexually assaulted by a mechanic in his town. 
The boy's family blamed him and turned him out. He was 
forced to live with the man who attacked him. "Now I am with 
someone else, and he taught me how to dance," the boy, now 
16 years old, said.
Other reports describe bacha bazi as an increasingly 
lucrative business, in which the boy slaves are seen as 
important status symbols of the elite. "Everyone tries to 
have the best, most handsome, and good-looking boy," a 
former mujahedin commander told Reuters back in 2007.
A 42-year-old landowner in Baghlan province named 
Enayatullah told Reuters, "I was married to a woman 20 years 
ago, she left me because of my boy. ... I was playing with 
my boy every night and was away from home, eventually my 
wife decided to leave me. I am happy with my decision 
because I am used to sleeping and entertaining with my young 
boy."
The boys, who often know no other life but as chattel, call 
the men "my lord." Attempting escape could result in severe 
physical punishment, or even death. The family of a dead 
15-year-old boy told Frontline that a policeman was 
eventually thrown in jail in connection with his murder. But 
they believed the boy's former owner, a wealthy drug baron 
whom he was escaping, bribed local officials to set the 
policeman free after only "a few months" of jail time.
"If only these people were punished, this kind of thing 
wouldn't happen," the boy's mother said. "Whoever commits 
these crimes doesn't get punished. Power is power."
I remember the first time I ever heard of bacha bazi. A 
soldier friend of mine who had been in Kabul told me of a 
disconcerting evening when he stumbled into a tea room in 
which a group of well-dressed Afghan men were gathering. His 
Afghan interpreter yanked him by the arm and out of the 
place, warning of danger. That was bacha bazi, he explained, 
in which young boys are forced to dance for men. He had 
better move on and forget.
He moved on, but he never forgot. Like me, my friend had 
grown up in a working class New England town, and these were 
horrors that men were beaten and even killed for in prison. 
We call it pedophilia, and most here would say is worth an 
eternity of damnation for its perpetrators, not a high 
social rank and adulation among the town's elite.
"It's gotten limited attention," admitted Rachel Reid of 
Human Rights Watch. "There's been some Afghan investigative 
journalists who have tackled it, though in areas where the 
perpetrators are also local 'commanders' whether official or 
unofficial, there will always be fear of reprisals."
Approaching the issue as Americans we are flummoxed, as if 
it occurs on another planet. Reprisals for exposing the 
sexual abuse of children? The Catholic Church spent more 
than a half-century hiding its abusive priests because it 
feared that reprisals from the outside might destroy the 
institution. Here, we have authority figures - former 
commanders and warlords - flaunting their dancing slave 
boys, practically daring interference from outside.
(ABC/Four Corners)
"What was so unnerving about the men I had met was not just 
their lack of concern for the damage their abuse was doing 
to the boys," said Najibullah Quraishi, the Afghan 
journalist who was escorted through the underground by one 
of the bacha bazi pimps for six months. His harrowing 
footage and reporting was broadcast by Australia's Four 
Corners in February and will make its American debut via 
Frontline. "It was also their casualness with which they 
operated and the pride with which they show me their boys, 
their friends, their world. They clearly believed that 
nothing they were doing was wrong."
The behavior of these modern slave owners belies an endemic 
problem that human rights advocates and even NATO military 
personnel operating in Afghanistan have observed for some 
time now, according to reports. (The U.S. State Department 
included the rape, abuse, and exploitation of Afghan 
children in its 2009 annual human rights report, released in 
March).
But observers say the age-old ritual of man-boy predatory 
sex, which is obliquely condoned throughout Afghanistan 
because of a pervasive fear or indifference about 
prosecuting it on any serious level, according to numerous 
reports, has proliferated after decades of poverty, 
corruption, and a lack of enduring social institutions. All 
reports indicate that while bacha bazi and the abuse is 
illegal, perpetrators rarely pay for their crimes. 
Meanwhile, poor families sell their children, and orphans 
are snatched off the street. They are the meekest, preyed 
upon by the strongest - the kind of wealthy, powerful men 
who have benefited most from the Western occupation and 
generous foreign aid.
This has put us in a moral and ethical quandary too painful 
and perhaps too shameful to contemplate more openly.
Take the military, for example. First, there seems to be a 
tacit acknowledgment on the part of Western soldiers that 
Afghans they serve with in the field are engaging in 
homosexual activity (no irony there, of course). Many have 
written about how the strict segregation of Afghan men and 
women (who are also treated as property in traditional 
Afghan society) before marriage prevents the course of 
natural physical and emotional relationships between the 
sexes, and as one Afghan historian told me, "Straight guys 
find that their sexuality is flexible in these sorts of 
situations ... soon [sex between men is] widely accepted 
with a wink and a nudge."
But it is when Afghan soldiers move beyond consensual 
"man-love Thursdays" with each other to procuring young boys 
in broad daylight that the flood of revulsion, resentment, 
and awkward questions comes to bear. Do they have the right 
to discipline? Would there be reprisals if they 
complained?
In 2008, apparently fed up, Canadian soldiers and chaplains 
did begin to complain.
In June that year the Toronto Star reported that a Canadian 
soldier said he witnessed in 2006 injuries sustained by a 
boy he had heard was raped by an Afghan soldier at one of 
the Canadian outposts in Kandahar. These injuries included 
the boy's intestines falling out of his body, a "sign of 
trauma from anal rape." The Canadian's testimony, in 
addition to other complaints, including an eyewitness 
account of the rape of a boy by two Afghan military 
personnel at Canada's Forward Operating Base Wilson in 2006, 
formed the basis of an official investigation into whether 
the brass were ignoring complaints about systematic abuse up 
through 2007.
According to the press, an initial military investigation 
concluded in 2008 that the allegations were unfounded. 
Another investigation, launched by the Canadian Forces 
National Investigation Services (CFNIS), concluded in May 
2009 that Canadian Forces Military Police in Afghanistan 
"did not receive any complaints on the alleged sexual abuse 
of Afghan male children." It did not answer the question of 
whether there had been any abuse, and it curiously noted 
that "the CFNIS has no jurisdiction over Afghan National 
Army or locally contracted interpreters in Afghanistan."
Nevertheless, subsequent testimony from Canadian personnel 
and newly released documents shed light on an utterly 
confusing landscape of conflicting official statements and 
reports, and they raise the question of who knew what and 
when, and whether the chain of command was listening or 
passing the buck. There are more than a few 
official/unofficial acknowledgments that Afghan police and 
military members were "having anal sex with young boys," 
plus disturbing allegations that the Canadian brass were 
told about the rapes and pressed soldiers to ignore them. 
A new board of inquiry was opened last year, but what will 
it conclude? Is the military so afraid of overstepping 
cultural and political boundaries that it is paralyzed from 
doing the right thing?
The Ottawa Citizen described the soldier who had witnessed 
the intestines falling out of the boy's body as now 
suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. If anecdotal 
evidence now surfacing that our own troops are witnessing 
similar things is true, we can only imagine the kind of 
moral and ethical hell they can be living out every day they 
risk their lives for this still largely undefined mission. 
In writing about the rape of boys and its implications on 
the sustained Western alliance with the Afghan government 
and military in the Long War, journalist Patrick Cockburn 
commented in September, "one reason Afghan villagers prefer 
to deal with the Taliban rather than the government security 
forces is that the latter have a habit of seizing their sons 
at checkpoints and sodomizing them."
The Taliban reportedly banned these practices when it was in 
power. Today, clerics we would consider radical openly and 
regularly condemn bacha bazi and sex with children. "Under 
Islamic law, those who practice this would be stoned to 
death," Mawllawi Mohammaed Sadiq Sadiqyar, a prayer leader 
and scholar in the city of Mazar-i-Sharif, told Reuters.
Nothing is ever black and white, and Taliban soldiers 
certainly don't always "practice what they preach," as one 
source pointed out to me. But the Western mission sure gets 
complicated under these conditions. As usual, there are more 
questions than answers.
If the U.S. mission is to kneecap the Taliban, a radical 
religious movement that at one point managed to ostensibly 
restrain the cruel and morally abominable activities of 
creepy pimps/masters who liked to dominate and play with 
boys when they weren't warring with one another and shaking 
down the weakest among them, what in the end, does it all 
mean for the Afghans whom President Obama has vowed to 
uplift? If Hamid Karzai sits on the top of this 
worm-infested confection without one word about prosecuting 
these crimes or protecting the children of his country, what 
does it say about the billions of dollars we have poured 
into his government to assist him?
What do we really know about the former mujahedin commanders 
we view as allies against the Taliban? What do they do at 
night while their wives wait patiently at home? Does it turn 
your stomach to think that American money went to train the 
police who now stand shoulder-to-shoulder each night with 
Afghan men gaping at underage boys dancing in silk with 
bells on their feet?
Are we the world's biggest chumps or the world's biggest 
enablers?
Cockburn made a practical point about what turning a blind 
eye may mean for Western soldiers in the long term:
"[T]he fact that male rape is common practice in the Afghan 
armed forces has, unfortunately, a great deal to do with the 
fate of British soldiers.
"There was a horrified reaction across Britain last week 
when a 25-year-old policeman called Gulbuddin working in a 
police station in the Nad Ali district of Helmand killed 
five British soldiers when he opened fire with a machine gun 
on them. But the reason he did so, according to Christina 
Lamb in The Sunday Times, citing two Afghans who knew 
Gulbuddin, was that he had been brutally beaten, sodomized, 
and sexually molested by a senior Afghan officer whom he 
regarded as being protected by the British.
"The slaughter at Nad Ali is a microcosm of what is 
happening across Afghanistan."
If winning the war against the "evildoers" means ignoring 
evil among our allies, then we have truly lost our soul. 
Cockburn argued that our governments should not put another 
Western soldier into Afghanistan while there is such obvious 
corruption snaking through the Afghan security services, not 
to mention the Karzai government. Too late. The U.S. 
military is set to expand its footprint of 100,000 by the 
end of the summer. Complaints within the ranks about Afghan 
military's worthiness in the field will continue to simmer, 
while most of this stuff about debauchery, man-love 
Thursdays, sexual abuse, and the like will be left to 
percolate on the milblogs and in the tales soldiers bring 
home. Forget the State Department reports and the undercover 
investigative journalism; until the military (which is, like 
it or not, the face of America in Afghanistan) starts 
publicly condemning bacha bazi and the abuse of Afghan 
children with all the force and authority it can muster, 
then we might as well be putting our red scrawl on a pact 
with the devil.
No doubt the military cannot and will not seriously envisage 
withdrawing from that country now, but it should nonetheless 
consider this: take a long look at the boys shackled in the 
prisons, the orphans in the streets, the blank resignation 
of the victims of rape - they will no doubt be history's 
next mujahedin, and they will be coming for the devil's 
consorts.
Obituary
LATE DR ISRAR AHMAD SAHEB MERHOOM
by Shamim Siddiqui [Long island, New York]
Dr Israr Ahmad Saheb is no more in this world but he left a 
name that will always be associated  in rendering eloquent 
services to the Qur'an and its introduction at mass level 
through his "Daroose Qur'an", lectures, cassettes,  Friday 
sermons, presenting in easy and understandable language  the 
meanings of the entire Qur'an during Taravih in Ramadan for 
years together, addressing mass meetings  of hundreds and 
thousands of people in India and Pakistan and writing 
Tafseer-e-Qur'an in fluent Urdu and English both for the 
common man and the students at large.
This all was possible for him to do because of the fact that 
he was a Da'ee Ilallah through and through with all its 
inherent qualities of heart and mind. He was born in 1932,  
was an active Muslim Youth during Pakistan Movement and then 
joined Islami Jameeat -e-Tulaba,  Pakistan and became its 
vibrant President  in early fifties. That paved his way to 
become an active Rukn [Member] of Jamaat-e-Islami and moved 
to Lahore, the hub of Pakistan politics.
Jamaat participated in the Provincial Elections of Punjab 
and could not do well. The controversy started that it 
should not participate in elections. It became a crisis and, 
therefore,  to resolve the issue an all Pakistan Conference 
of Jamaat's Arkan was held at Machigot  in Rahimyar Khan 
district of Punjab in a ginning factory in February 1958. 
1035 Arkan [Members of JIP]  attended this meeting, 
including 15 from East Pakistan and fortunately I was one of 
them, to decide whether JIP should participate in elections 
or not? The meeting continued for five days where Merhoom 
Israr Saheb opposed and presented his paper that took three 
hours undisturbed to complete. Maulana Maududi  (RA) replied 
his view points in six hours with logical arguments by 
threadbare discussion of the history of JIP till that time 
and soundly proved that election participation was correct 
for the change of leadership of the country. Out of 1035, 
Arkan 1015 supported Maulana's viewpoint and the Resolution 
was adopted to continue the Methodology that JIP was 
pursuing towards  the change of leadership through election 
process.
Late Dr Israr Saheb differed and resigned from JIP along 
with Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi Merhoom  and seven other 
members of Jamaat. Later on he published his speech of 
Machigot Ijtemaa and started his own Movement In the name of 
Tanzeem-e- Islami, Pakistan and published Magazines like 
Meesaque, Hikmat-e Qur'an and many other Institutions  to 
augment his movement and establish Khilafah in Pakistan to 
serve the cause of the Qur'an  and the Movement.
He used to visit the USA on regular basis but stopped 
subsequently after the unfortunate tragedy of 9/11. He 
started an extended organization of TIP as TINA in the USA 
which is alive still in some pockets of this country. He has 
a great desire that I should join TINA but I asked him: has 
he any Program for the USA? He replied in negative.  I, 
therefore, declined respectfully. However,  I am a regular 
subscriber of his papers and periodicals that help in 
understanding the on-going Islamic Movements of Indo-Pak 
subcontinent.
One may differ from his political views but his contribution 
to popularize the message of the Qur'an in Pakistan,  India, 
ME and around the world is voluminous and a record by 
itself. The young generation  can reach to the message of 
the Qur'an directly through his various efforts and eloquent 
cassettes in different languages of the world.
His legacies will be paramount for centuries  to come. He 
has left behind a team of trained and trusted workers like 
Dr Sami Ali and his entire family which he groomed patiently 
for the Iqamah of Allah's Deen in Pakistan and elsewhere in 
the world.
May Allah pardon his sins if any, multiply reward for his 
good deeds manifold, place his soul in Jannatul Firdaus and 
give Tawfeeq to Br. Hafiz A'kib  Sayeed who is now the 
current Amir of TIP to continue his legendary work 
incessantly and try to cooperate with his parent body, the 
JIP, to get his agenda of Iqamatuddeen fulfilled. It was his 
earnest desire and he put me to that task to materialize in 
early eighties by developing a working cooperation between 
the two Movements  but it could not materialize due to 
negative attitude of some of Jamaat's leaders. The field is 
wide open in the context of Pakistan and he should explore 
every opportunity to that end. This is the need of time.
Shamim Siddiqi
New York
WWW.dawahinamericas.com
Dr Israr Ahmed's Service to Invite Young Generation Towards 
The Way of Qur'an Would Always Be Remembered : SIO
New Delhi 14/04/10: National Secretariat of Students Islamic 
Organization of India (SIO) expressed deep sorrow over the 
death of renowned Islamic scholar Dr Israr Ahmad. The demise 
of such an outstanding scholar is a great loss particularly 
for the Islamic activism of our times. Dr Israr Ahmed shall 
be long remembered for his life long effort to invite young 
generation towards Islam through his brilliant 
interpretations of the Holy Qur'an. His Dars-e-Qur'an guided 
many lives towards true spirit of Islam as in his young days 
he was guided and trained by great Islamic Scholar Maulana 
Syed Abul Ala Maududi. His services as scholar as well as 
preacher of Islam would always be remembered. May Allah 
Almighty shower his blessings on the departed soul and give 
courage and fortitude to his family members and associates 
of his organization Tanzim-e-Islami, to bear this 
irreparable loss with equanimity (Ameen).
Shahnawaz Ali Raihan
National Secretary
SIO of India
New Delhi-25
A note on World Wat II history by Kaukab Siddique
Censorship: Zionist Control of Major Book Stores Keeps David 
Irving's Books Away from the American Public
David Irving is undeniably the greatest historian of the 
Second World War. His books such as Hitler's War, Goebbels, 
Churchill's War and others are meticulously documented from 
primary sources of information. He found that there is no 
documentary evidence for Hitler's alleged orders to 
exterminate the Jews; nor were there any gas chambers in 
Auschwitz. His honesty earned him the undying hatred of 
International Jewry leading to his imprisonment in 
Austria.
During his recent trip to the USA, he was attacked by the 
Zionists in a Chicago restaurant  in an attempt to do him 
serious injury. Unfortunately for the assailants, bold and 
rapid action by a German woman who supports Irving brought 
the police to the scene and the thugs were caught red handed 
in the process of destroying books and vandalizing Irving's 
possessions.
Photo below: Dr. Kaukab Siddique [left] with British 
historian David Irving at a reception in Arlington, 
Virginia.[Photo courtesy N.]
With thanks to Dr. Ismail Zayid, Canada
Jewish Settlers deface mosque in West Bank
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:19:05 GMT
A Palestinian cleans a graffiti of the star of David and a 
word reading in Hebrew 'Mohammed' from the wall of a mosque 
in the West Bank village of Hawara, south of Nablus, 
Wednesday, April 14, 2010.
Jewish settlers have desecrated a mosque in the flashpoint 
West Bank town of Nablus and set afire two vehicles outside 
the Muslim worship house.
Unknown vandals forcibly entered the Bilal Ben-Rabah Mosque 
in the village of Hawara overnight Wednesday and sprayed 
graffiti, including a Jewish Star of David alongside the 
name of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) written in Hebrew on the 
mosque walls.
The Palestinians say residents of the nearby Yitzhar 
settlement ascended upon the village at 2 am local time 
(2300 GMT) and committed the offenses.
Local council chairman Samer Uda said a complaint had been 
filed with Israeli authorities. "We call on human rights 
groups and Israeli authorities to do everything possible in 
order to put an end to the repeated harassments by 
settlers," he said. "A few weeks ago they set a truck on 
fire."
The Israeli military commander for the West Bank, Brigadier 
General Nitzan Alon, called for a probe into the 
sacrilegious act and "promised" to punish anyone found 
guilty.
The incident is the latest in a spate of anti-Muslim 
violence in the area, which has also seen the eviction of 
Palestinians by Israeli settlers in the West Bank.
In December, extremist settlers vandalized a mosque in the 
West Bank village of Yasuf just before dawn. The vandals 
burned prayer mats and a book stand with sacrosanct, Islamic 
texts and sprayed slogans on the mosque walls reading, 'Get 
ready to pay the price.' Another was accompanied by the more 
direct threat, 'We will burn all of you.'
Hard-line Jewish settlers have said they will attack 
Palestinians in retaliation for any measures by the Tel Aviv 
regime that they deem threatening to Jewish settlements. It 
is part of what they describe as the "price tag" policy. 
All Jewish settlements in the West Bank, including East 
Jerusalem (al-Quds), are illegal under international law, 
though Tel Aviv denies this.
http://presstv. com/detail. 
aspx?id=123330§ionid=351020202
Our America: Obama, leaning to the right, ignores his core 
constituency
Unemployment Statistics: A Tale of Two Cities
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III [Silver Spring, Maryland]
The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released employment 
data for March. Many analysts agree that the numbers show 
the first substantial gain for payrolls since December 2007. 
 Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 162,000 and the 
unemployment rate held steady at 9.7 percent.  According to 
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, "The U.S. 
economy has "turned the corner," but it will still take up 
to five years to regain all the jobs lost since the economic 
collapse..."
This is encouraging news on a number of fronts. However, a 
closer look reveals some frightening realities that lay 
behind the positive indicators. For African Americans in 
many regions of this country the numbers reflect a tale of 
two cites, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of 
times; ... it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of 
despair."  In March 2010 while the unemployment rate for the 
country was 9.7 percent; the national unemployment rate for 
African Americans was almost double at 16.6 percent. On the 
state level, according to the Economic Policy Institute's 4Q 
2009 numbers, the unemployment rate in Michigan for African 
Americans was 22.3 percent, California 15.5, and New York 
14.6.
As disturbing as the unemployment numbers are for African 
Americans, they don't begin to tell the whole story. When 
these numbers are viewed in the context of other factors 
such as the disparity in median family income, wealth 
accumulation, and poverty levels they indicate that an 
entrenched systemic social policy problem exists for African 
Americans that a jobs recovery will not address.
According to 2007 U.S. Census Data, White families made 62% 
more than Black families. The median family income for White 
families was $54,920 while the median income for Black 
families was $33,916. Based on data from the 2002 Survey of 
Income and Program Participation, White median household net 
worth was about $90,000, compared to a mere $6,000 for the 
median Black household.  8.2% of White families were (this 
is data from 2007) living in poverty compared to 24.5% of 
Black families.  As Dr. Ronald Walters explains in White 
Nationalism Black Interests, these indicators of greater 
social instability loom large for a substantial portion of 
the Black community that has not benefitted from the 
economic system.
Some members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) are 
expressing concern that they are not receiving a significant 
level of support from President Obama and his staff, 
claiming that the administration has not done enough for 
African Americans.  According to POLITICO, House Judiciary 
Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) said that White House 
officials are "not listening" to black lawmakers and Rep. 
Alcee Hastings (D-FL) said "there's not enough attention to 
poor people."
According to the Washington Post, other members of the CBC 
such as Emanuel Cleaver II (D-MO) and Donald Payne (D-NJ) 
are expressing their frustration regarding how to address 
these issues. "How can you express criticism of the 
administration without eventually confronting the man at the 
top?" The article continues, "Some (CBC members) say that 
any public airing of their disagreements with Obama runs the 
risk of politically damaging the president and ultimately 
slowing the advancement of other African Americans."
Why is holding the president accountable a problem?  What 
are members of the CBC afraid of?  With 24.5% of African 
American families living in poverty, a median household net 
worth of $6,000, and a national unemployment rate for 
African Americans almost double the national average, how 
much slower can African Americans advance? Are the same 
figures that were unacceptable for a white president somehow 
acceptable under an African American president?
Why should they be concerned about political damage to a 
president who by their own admission feels that key members 
of the Obama administration, "have taken them for granted, 
in the belief that Black members of Congress have no stomach 
for a fight with the country's first Black president."  
According to POLITICO, A CBC aide said that senior aid 
Valerie Jarrett has "canceled lunch plans with the caucus 
eight times and that her office is slow to return calls and 
pays more attention to longtime supporters than to senior 
CBC members."
Since the CBC is so frustrated and confused, here are a few 
suggestions for them to consider proposing to President 
Obama:
1)      Work with the SBA and insurers such as AIG to back 
African American owned business that are having difficulty 
meeting bonding requirements as they pursue government 
contracts (stimulus package projects) as prime and 
subcontrators.
2)      Resurrect the '98 Clinton Administration SBA plan to 
enhance access to debt/equity capital via SBA guaranteed 
loans for African American owned businesses.
3)      The Senate and House Small Business Committees 
should mandate that the SBA enforce federal agency 
subcontracting plans. Liquidated damages have rarely if ever 
been enforced against a non compliant government contractor. 
CBC members probably have numerous African American owned 
firms in their districts that would benefit from enforcement 
efforts in federal contracting.
Members of the CBC chair four committees and 18 
subcommittees.  If they can not leverage their power and 
effectively develop legislation and social policy that 
address the systemic ills impacting African American 
progress, an increasing number will continue to experience 
the worst of times in a season of darkness.
Dr. Wilmer Leon is the Producer/ Host of the nationally 
broadcast call-in talk radio program "On With Leon," and a 
Lecturer in the Department of Political Science at Howard 
University in Washington, D.C.  Go to www.wilmerleon.com or 
email: wjl3us@yahoo.com.
© 2010 InfoWave Communications, LLC.
With thanks to Sis. Hamdiyya, Jamaat al-Muslimeen, 
Charlotte, North Carolina
"Highest Value Detainee" was not a mujahid but an ordinary 
civilian
Corrupt Mauritanian, Jordanian and Afghan  Regimes worked 
with US to Put an Innocent Muslim in GTMO Cages for NINE 
Years
Guantanamo Detainee Ordered Freed
William Fisher
NEW YORK, 12 Apr (IPS) - After nine years in captivity, a 
U.S. federal court has ordered the release of a Guantanamo 
prisoner once described as the "highest-value detainee at 
the facility" - and set off a firestorm of protest from 
Republican lawmakers.
Federal District Judge James Robertson ruled in Washington, 
D.C. that the U.S. could not continue to detain Mohamedou 
Ould Salahi (sometimes spelled "Slahi"), a Mauritanian 
citizen who has been in U.S. custody since 2001.
Judge Robertson's opinion, providing the reasons for the 
granting of Salahi's habeas corpus petition, was released 
last week after undergoing a classification review. Some 
portions were withheld as classified.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and private 
attorneys challenged Salahi's detention, arguing that the 
government had no reliable evidence that he was part of al 
Qaeda when he was seized in 2001.
Salahi became the 34th Guantanamo detainee whose 
imprisonment has been declared illegal.
Jonathan Hafetz, staff attorney with the ACLU National 
Security Project, told IPS, "Salahi's case is a national 
disgrace - rendition, brutal torture, and eight years of 
arbitrary detention without charge or any reliable or 
credible evidence. Regrettably, rather than ending this 
shameful episode that flouts the rule of law, and 
repatriating Salahi, the government is seeking to prolong 
his illegal imprisonment."
"The district court's decision invalidating that detention 
and ordering Salahi's release is an important step towards 
restoring the rule of law," he added.
After Salahi was arrested in Mauritania on suspicion of ties 
to al Qaeda, the U.S. government illegally rendered him to 
Jordan, where he was detained, interrogated and abused for 
eight months. He was then rendered to Bagram, Afghanistan 
and finally to Guantánamo, where he has been held in U.S. 
custody since August 2002.
While at Guantánamo, Salahi was held in total isolation for 
months, kept in a freezing cold cell, shackled to the floor, 
deprived of food, made to drink salt water and forced to 
stand in a room with strobe lights and heavy metal music for 
hours at a time.
He was threatened with harm to his family, forbidden from 
praying, beaten and subjected to the "frequent flyer" 
programme, during which he was awakened every few hours to 
deprive him of sleep. The government falsely told him that 
his mother had been arrested and was being sent to 
Guantánamo.
Salahi's abuse was documented in a 2009 report by the Senate 
Armed Services Committee.
Marine Corps Lt. Col. Stuart Couch, the military lawyer 
originally assigned to prosecute the case against Salahi in 
the military commissions, determined that Salahi's 
self-incriminating statements were so tainted by torture 
that they couldn't ethically be used against him.
Couch told his supervisors that he was "morally opposed" to 
Salahi's treatment and refused to participate in the 
prosecution. In his decision, Judge Robertson wrote that 
there is "ample evidence in this record that Salahi was 
subjected to extensive and severe mistreatment at 
Guantánamo".
Congressional Republicans expressed outrage over the 
decision. The Hill newspaper reported that Sen. Kit Bond of 
Missouri, the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee, 
stated, "While (Attorney General Eric) Holder's Justice 
Department should appeal this outrageous decision, I'm not 
holding my breath. Holder seems more intent on closing 
Guantánamo Bay than keeping terrorists locked up where they 
belong."
The Hill also reported that Rep. Lamar Smith, a Texas 
Republican, sent a letter to Holder asking him to appeal the 
ruling, in which he wrote, "It is certainly possible, if not 
likely, that Mr. Salahi will re-engage in efforts to commit 
terrorist attacks against innocent Americans if allowed to 
go free. This ruling clearly puts the American people in 
danger and should not be allowed to stand."
The Department of Justice said it would appeal Judge 
Robertson's decision. However, even if the government's 
appeal is unsuccessful, it is unclear that Salahi could be 
released until another country offers to take him in.
Salahi was subjected to several years of torture, which 
began soon after he was taken in by the Mauritanian 
authorities on November 20, 2001, at the request of the Bush 
administration. "My country turned me over, shortcutting all 
kinds of due process of law, like a candy bar to the United 
States," he said in his combatant status review tribunal at 
Guantánamo in 2004.
Salahi was transferred by the U.S. from Mauritania to 
Jordan. He was held there for eight months and said what 
happened to him was "beyond description". He was then 
transferred to the U.S. prison at Bagram airbase in 
Afghanistan for two weeks and arrived in Guantánamo on Aug. 
4, 2002.
Historian Andy Worthington reports that, "as the 
highest-value detainee at Guantánamo - in the days before 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and 13 other high-value detainees 
were flown in from secret CIA prisons in September 2006 - 
Salahi was again subjected to torture, which included 
prolonged isolation, prolonged sleep deprivation, beatings, 
death threats and threats that his mother would be brought 
to Guantánamo and gang-raped."
This programme, he says, was implemented in May 2003 and 
augmented with further "enhanced interrogation techniques" 
authorised by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
It culminated in August 2003 in an incident when Salahi was 
taken out on a boat, wearing isolation goggles, while agents 
whispered, within earshot, that he was "about to be executed 
and made to disappear". As the German magazine Der Spiegel 
explained in an article in 2008, "He was so terrified that 
he urinated in his pants."
US sanctions target fighters
Somalis Declare Baidoa an Islamic Province.
Barack Obama, the US president, has issued an executive 
order to freeze assets of individuals with ties to Somalia's 
 al-Shabab movement.
Obama's directive allows the US treasury department to 
sanction or freeze the assets of individuals with suspected 
links to the piracy off Somalia's coast or those who have in 
any way been involved in threatening Somalia's 
stability.
The piracy and eroding security in Somalia "constitute an 
unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security 
and foreign policy of the United States," Obama said in his 
executive order on Tuesday.
The decree specifically targets anyone who threatens the 
peace, interferes with the delivery of humanitarian 
assistance or violates the United Nations arms embargo in 
the lawless nation.
Target
Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, a prominent Somali opposition 
figure, is one of those targeted by the new sanctions.
Last year Aweys said he was working to unite his Islamic 
Party with al-Shabab.
Al-Shabab is battling to overthrow the US-backed Somali 
government.
Meanwhile, al-Shabab fighters are claiming to have gained 
full control of the city of Baidoa in southern Somalia, 
which they have declared to be an Islamist province.
According to reports, the group's fighters last week 
disarmed guards at a UN World Food Programmes (WFP) base in 
Wajid, near Baidoa, and also seized control of the nearby 
airstrip.
2010-04-16 Fri 19:29:13 cdt
NewTrendMag.org