[Biggest 
Islamic 
web site in the 
U.S.]
P.O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21087. Phone: 410-435-5000.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are not necessarily 
shared by editorial committee.
Responses (positive or negative) up to 250 words are welcome.
Names will be withheld on request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan Mourns Big Military Loss: General 
Musharraf Weeps.
Politicians Call for Investigation and Sharing of 
Information
Conspiracy Theories: 
U.S. 
or Al-Qaida or 
Mechanical Failure?
On February 21, 2003 for the first time 
General Musharraf wept quietly 
in public at the funeral of Mushaf Ali Mir, chief 
of the Pakistan air force 
and his wife who were killed along with two air 
vice marshals, 11 squadron 
leaders of the air fighter command, and two 
technicians when their Fokker 
aircraft went down near the 
Afghan 
frontier, 55 
miles west of Kohat.
Both Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif have 
demanded (from exile) an 
investigation into the crash. The government has 
urged that speculation in 
the media be stopped till an inquiry is held. 
There is a plethora of 
conspiracy theories coming out of Pakistan. The 
three most important are as 
follows:
1. According to the government, the crash took 
place owing to technical 
reasons. Critics of the government say that such 
an explanation is not 
tenable because:
i. The plane was in "mint condition," and the 
final message from the plane 
did not indicate any technical problems.
ii. The weather conditions were perfect.
Thus attribution of technical reasons means the 
government is hiding 
something.
2. The U.S. shot it down. This is the most 
popular theory and is receiving 
widespread acceptance owing to the prevalent 
anti-U.S. sentiment. These 
theorists link it to the kind of subversion which 
brought down the plane in 
which General Zia was flying. The U.S. did not 
demand any investigation of 
that crash.
2a. These theorists add that the U.S. has used 
Musharref and now wants to get 
rid of him to (possibly) bring back someone else 
(like Benazir).
2b. It is said that Mushaf Ali was unhappy with 
U.S. bases in Pakistan 
(though there is no evidence of this).
3. The Air Chief was flying near the Afghan 
frontier where fighting has been 
going on almost every day in bits and pieces. The 
mujahideen would see any 
air craft as American. In December and January, 
two American pilotless planes 
returning back from Afghanistan crashed short of 
their base in Jacobabad, 
Pakistan (probanly limping back after being hit 
by ground fire). The Fokker 
and the pilotless planes are relatively slow 
moving and relatively easy to 
shoot down.
3a. The Fokker could have been known to be 
Pakistani and shot down by the 
mujahideen in retaliation for Musharraf's 
cooperation with the U.S. More than 
400 mujahideen have been hunted down and handed 
over to the U.S. by 
Musharraf's troops. Pakistani helicopters entered 
Pashtun villages giving 
refuge to the mujahideen and Musharraf's troops 
blew up homes in 
Israeli 
style.
3b. This theory is strengthened by the fact that 
Mushaf Ali was not visiting 
Pakistani air bases on the 
Indian 
frontier but 
was operating in the Pashtun 
areas. The Pakistani military is paid for by the 
Pakistani people to defend 
the country against India, not to cooperate with 
the U.S. to hunt the sons of 
Islam.
Which one of these theories is correct? Only time 
will tell. There could be 
some indications:
i. If Musharref starts, gradually, changing his 
policy towards the U.S., that 
would mean that he suspects the U.S., and his 
feelings are hurt (Mushaf Ali 
was very close to him).
ii. The U.S. 
media 
has COMPLETELY IGNORED THE 
DEATH OF ITS CHIEF ALLY'S AIR 
MARSHAL. Absolutely no reporting at all! Why? 
Does it fit into the U.S. psy 
ops of ignoring the losses it suffers in 
Afghanistan? Even the 
CIA 
officer 
killed last month did not get anything more than 
a news line UNDER the TV 
screen. Something is going on here. Watch U.S. 
reporting carefully. Some say 
the jihad is taking a steady toll of U.S. and 
pro-U.S. forces.
TRUE OR FALSE?
---------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION IN RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA
On February 21, 2003, a British citizen 
connected to the defense 
industry, BAE, was shot when he stopped at a 
traffic light in Riyadh. The 
item was reported VERY BRIEFLY in the U.S. media, 
which is very strange for 
something happening in the Saudi capital.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IRAN DEPORTS HIKMATYAR'S FAMILY
The Afghaistan-sl list reported February 23, 
2003 that the Iranian 
government has deported the wife and children of 
Hizbe Islami leader 
Gulbuddin Hikmatyar. Observers think the move is 
meant to please the U.S.
[Iran is said to be working with the U.S. in the 
coming attack on 
Iraq. 
It is said to be using pro-Iran groups to undermine 
the Iraqi regime when the 
U.S. attacks. Also, it hopes to gain some Iraqi 
territory. It also wants to 
liquidate Iranian rebel groups which are 
located in Iraq.]
Scroll down to reports below on the U.S. 
stance on Hikmatyar and 
Hikmatyar's reply.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIGGEST OBSCENITY OF THE MONTH: "Democracy" in 
Turkey
U.S. media report that 90% of Turkey's 
PEOPLE oppose the U.S. planned 
attack on Iraq. Regardless of what the 90% think, 
the generals who control 
Turkey are working to provide military facilities 
to the U.S. but are holding 
out for $30 billion as a bribe rather than the 
$26 billion the U.S. is 
offering.
SELDOM HAS A NATION BEEN SO UNITED. 90% 
against, 10% for ! That's a 
record unequaled in history. Then you have 
America working against 
"democracy." It ignores the 90% and wants to use 
$26 billion to launch 
aggression against Iraq from the north.
[Those idiots who think the U.S. supports 
democracy should now shut up.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003-02-23 Sun 07:01ct