New Trend Magazine (www.newtrendmag.org)
(Print sample: $1 to P.O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21087)
[This is a special from our Pakistan desk. We are also working on 
interviews 
with Pakistan's jihad leader, Hafiz Saeed, of Lashkar Taiba, before his 
arrest, and Syed Munawar Hasan, Secretary General of Jamaate Islami, 
who 
leads JI when Qazi Hussain Ahmad is under Musharraf's arrest..]
[First some local news: Three Muslim groups are preparing national 
conventions: ICNA, ISNA and Imam W.D. Muhammad's followers (now known 
as 
MAS).  The Islamic status of these groups is not clear. They support 
President Bush's "war on terror" and are isolated from the Muslim 
ummah, 
worldwide and within the U.S.,  which opposes Bush's moves. Many young 
people 
who attend these groups' conventions have no idea what these groups 
stand 
for.  We urge Muslims to ask these groups a simple question: DO YOU 
ACCEPT 
the QUR'AN and the SUNNAH as BINDING SOURCES OF GUIDANCE ? The three 
groups 
should make a simple announcement: We accept the Qur'an and the Sunnah 
as 
binding guidance and are willing to be held to these standards. If 
ISNA, ICNA 
and W.D. Muhammad already take Qur'an/Sunnah as guidance, they should 
publish 
their affirmation so that young people would  not be confused.]
[More local news: June 28, 2002. Pakistanis selling jewelry in American 
malls 
are being investigated, in case they might be transmitting funds to 
Al-Qaidah.]
[While Jews continue to fund the terrorist state of Israel, two 
Lebanese 
brothers in Charlotte, North Carolina have been convicted of sending 
$3500 to 
Hezbollah in Lebanon, an authentic Islamic movement, legal in Lebanon, 
to 
help school children. The two could get up to 55 years in prison]
[A Jewish Federation member finds the teachings of 
Dr. Kaukab Siddique 
and 
Imam Badi Ali "unbelievable." She was monitoring the Saudi newspaper 
ARAB 
NEWS of June 28 when she saw the complete New Trend report on Dr. 
Siddique's 
khutba in Greensboro, NC, published therein. She alerted her group and 
has 
questioned Greensboro's newspaper about it.]
[Imam Badi Ali's BOYCOTT LIST of Jewish businesses which support Israel 
include McDonalds, Disney, and Coca Cola. Join the boycott movement. 
Don't 
support Israeli murders of Palestinian children with your own money.]
------------------------------------------------
Gen. Pervez Musharraf Taking Pakistan down with him: Pakistani forces 
hunt 
Mujahideen
Slick Game with U.S. and India Helped to Contain Islamic Movement, 
destroy 
Taliban
Violent Incidents Indicate Assailants Consider Pakistan part of 
U.S.-U.K. 
Coalition
Pakistani coup leader Pervez Musharraf inherited pro-American 
anti-Islam policies from the governments of Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz 
Sharif. 
The difference was that pre-Musharraf governments kept a low profile in 
their 
deals with the bosses in the White House. After 9/11, Musharref decided 
to 
cash in on the American desire to topple the Taliban. It was a 
calculated 
decision in which American money was weighed against loyalty to Islam, 
brotherhood with Afghanistan, support for Kashmir, the aspirations of 
the 
Pakistani people. American money won. Musharref was promised ONE 
BILLION 
DOLLARS and a write-off of Pakistani debts. 
MUSHARREF's BLUNDER NUMBER ONE was loss of Afghan support for 
Pakistan. 
Thus Pakistan lost the strategic depth it had gained by the victory of 
the 
Taliban in Kabul.
During the earlier stage of the American intervention in 
Afghanistan, 
Musharref behaved a little coyly, as if he still had some shreds of 
honor 
left. Within that context, he "advised" Bush not to continue the 
BOMBING 
DURING RAMADAN. His "advice" was ignored. America dropped a 500 kg bomb 
on a 
mosque in Ramadan WHILE TARAWEEH PRAYERS WERE ON.
BLUNDER NUMBER TWO. Induction of American forces into Pakistan. 
Jacobabad became a U.S. military base. The FBI spread out from 
Islamabad 
(where it was in place during the Nawaz Sharif regime) into Karachi and 
other 
cities. The Americans are also said to be monitoring Pakistani nuclear 
facilities and have reached "close up" positions. A first in dishonor 
for 
Pakistan, AFGHAN AMBASSADOR ABDUS SALAM ZAEEF WAS HANDED OVER TO THE 
U.S. No 
Muslim government has ever carried out such a despicable act.
BLUNDER NUMBER THREE. As the protests against Musharref grew in the 
streets, the coup leader took the line that these are mere "extremists" 
and 
that most people are with him. The protests grew to 50,000 people 
(conservative estimates) per city and took place almost DAILY in major 
Pakistani cities. Thus several million people were demonstrating on a 
given 
day in Pakistan. [Jamaate Islami and Jamiat ‘Ulema-e-Islam took the 
lead.] 
Here was a chance for Musharref to withdraw from the U.S.-British 
(covertly 
Israeli) coalition. He could have said that Pakistanis do not support 
my 
pro-U.S. moves and I can't go against the people's wishes. Or HE COULD 
HAVE 
CALLED FOR A REFERENDUM ON SUPPORT FOR THE WAR ON TERROR. Instead he 
decided 
to go 100% with Bush and kept claiming that the demonstrators (STILL 
VERY 
PEACEFUL) were just a "bunch of extremists."
[Important note: The movement remained peaceful. The only blood 
drawn was 
by Musharref's police which killed a number of people in Karachi. 
Neither 
Musharref nor his police were punished for these murders of peaceful 
demonstrators.]
BLUNDER NUMBER FOUR. Musharref sent Pakistani military forces to 
seal of 
the Afghan border to help American troops looking for Al-Qaidah and 
Taliban 
guerrilla forces. Thus he opened a second front against Pakistan.
BLUNDER NUMBER FIVE. Musharref accepted the Indian-American idea 
that 
Pakistani volunteers going into Kashmir to help stop Indian atrocities 
were 
"terrorists."  Hundreds of Kashmir-oriented mujahideen have been 
arrested by 
Musharref to help stop what India calls "cross border terrorism." Thus 
Musharref effectively gave up the Pakistani right to intervene in 
Kashmir. 
(The K in Pakistan is for Kashmir.) Musharref has indicated that 
Pakistan 
will support Kashmiri rights only on the diplomatic, political and 
"moral" 
fronts. Not surprisingly India's extreme right wing (KKK type) 
government has 
declared that it has won against Pakistan without fighting.
BLUNDER NUMBER SIX. Musharref decided to hold a referendum to get 
himself legitimized as Pakistan's president. This was a personal 
blunder for 
him and indicates that he is surrounded by secularist advisers who do 
not 
realize the depth of the resurgent Islamic awakening in Pakistan. Most 
observers agree that Musharref got only 5% of the vote. Hence Pakistan 
has an 
illegitimate regime hanging on with U.S. (Israeli) support against the 
will 
of the people.
-------------------------------------
MUSHARREF's INDIA CARD:
In his very first speech in support of the war on "terrorism", 
Musharref 
claimed that he must go along with America because India might take 
advantage 
of the situation if America becomes angry. He also claimed that 
Pakistani 
support for the U.S. would be mainly "logistic."
However, the demonstrations showed that masses of people did not 
buy his 
story. But the demonstrations ended in Ramadan as people went back to 
traditional late night prayers (taraweehs) in mosques after day long 
fasting. 
[Obviously Pakistanis are not ready for Jihad. Hadith indicate that 
fasts can 
be broken during Jihad.] This gave Musharref's secular coterie a whole 
month 
to plot and plan. After Ramadan, the a well-organized move was made to 
divert 
attention from the war in Afghanistan. There was a raid on the Indian 
parliament in which a few policemen were killed. This raid was used as 
a 
pretext to mass Indian troops on the Pakistani frontier. It appeared as 
if 
India was planning to move against Pakistan. However, it was only a 
feint and 
successfully stopped the movement against Musharref.
[THERE WERE MASS MURDERS OF MUSLIMS IN INDIA, including rapes of 
hundreds of Muslim women in Gujarat.  Musharraf could have brought up 
the 
issue of Indian Muslims to world forums or at least shown intense 
concern. He 
did nothing. He was preparing the "referendum." Thus confrontation with 
India 
is definitely NOT part of Musharref's agenda though it is part of his 
tactics 
to deflect internal pressure.]
After the "referendum", Musharref felt very vulnerable. Had he 
been an 
honest man, he would have resigned. In that context of his 
vulnerability, we 
can understand the current standoff between India and Pakistan.
Some ISLAMIC GROUP seems to have understood that if India can 
actually 
be goaded into attacking Pakistan, that would help to unite the people. 
The 
attack on an Indian military camp in occuppied Kashmir caused a hundred  
Indian military casualties, though Indian propaganda focused only on 
the few 
civilian deaths (families of occupation troops). India was furious and 
Indian 
strategists saw it as an opportunity to work with Bush and Musharref to 
delegitimize Pakistani intervention in Kashmir. The Indian strategy won 
because Bush and Musharref were working with India. The Islamic group 
did not 
succeed because an actual Indian attack did not take place. In fact the 
confrontation erased some of the mud on Musharref's face which came 
from the 
failed "referendum."
ERUPTIONS OF VIOLENCE WITHIN PAKISTAN
The peaceful Islamic movement could not budge Musharref from 
his 
pro-American entanglement. Pakistanis feel humiliated and enraged that 
the 
Islamic regime in Afghanistan was toppled and they could do nothing 
about it. 
Thousands of ill-armed and untrained Pakistanis actually crossed into 
Pakistan to help the Taliban. Many of them were slaughtered in U.S. 
bombing 
raids. Others were captured and imprisoned by the "northern alliance" 
in 
steel containers. [Musharref would not allow Pakistanis martyred in 
Afghanistan to be given a public funeral in Karachi.] [How many 
Pakistanis 
were killed by the "northern alliance?" The Musharref regime is not 
interested.]
Incidents in Pakistan indicate that some, as yet 
unknown/concealed, 
groups have started a campaign of violence aimed at damaging the 
Musharref 
government's relationships and prospects. First there was the 
kidnapping of 
Daniel Pearl. The demands of the kidnappers indicated that they opposed 
the 
transfer of Al-Qaidah prisoners to Cuba (a violation of international 
law) 
and condemned the bombing of Afghanistan. Pearl's hideous murder sent 
shock 
waves throughout the world. Pakistanis were surprised to learn that 
Pearl was 
an Israeli. Though there can be no excuse for such a killing, Pearl's 
visit 
to Pakistan indicates that Israelis much more subtle than him, with 
U.S. 
passports,  could well be operating in Pakistan, monitoring Pakistan's 
nuclear capabilities and preparing for a strike. [Readers may not 
remember 
that ISRAEL BROKE ALL INTERNATIONAL LAWS TO BOMB THE IRAQI NUCLEAR 
FACILITY 
IN OSIRAK at a time when Iraq was America's friend. Much preparation on 
the 
ground went into  the actual strike.]
Then for the FIRST TIME we have martyrdom operations in Pakistan. 
A 
busload of French specialists was blown up while they were preparing to 
set 
up a naval facility for joint Pak-U.S. use. It was a setback for 
investments 
in Pakistan as it took place in the best hotel area and a visiting 
cricket 
team decided not to tour Pakistan. Obviously the assailants consider 
Pakistan 
a target because of its inclusion in the U.S.- British (Israeli) 
coalition.
Then assailants attacked the American consulate in Karachi. 
Although 
the explosion was powerful, it seemed to be an amateurish attack as the 
casualties were largely Pakistani passersby. The real target, the 
Consulate, 
was not hit, though it was closed down for a week and now operates at a 
minimal level. Thus the hit-and-miss assailants killed innocent people 
and 
were only successful to the extent of cutting off Pakistan-U.S. 
traffic.
These acts of extreme violence are still not traceable to 
specific 
sources. If these were carried out by Pakistanis, they are very 
disturbing in 
that they herald the transfer of leadership from the peaceful movement 
to the 
violent groups.
Though most Pakistanis (more than 80%) support (even love) Osama 
bin 
Laden and the Taliban, they are peaceful people who do not envisage a 
physical conflict with Musharref's troops or even with U.S. or 
pro-U.S. 
elements in Pakistan.
However, as Musharref continues to fight America's battles, the 
internal situation can only get worse as more and more Pakistanis 
decide to 
fight force with force.
LATEST BATTLE: On June 26, Pakistani mercenary troops, at Musharref's 
orders, 
working with the U.S. decided to capture a handful of Islamic fighters 
from 
Chechnya who had taken refuge in a village on the Pak-Afghan border.  
Obviousy the Chechens, who have  given up everything for the sake of 
Islam, 
are welcome in Pakistan and were being treated as members of the family 
by 
Pakistani villagers, when Musharref's troops (backed by American 
‘observers') 
attacked the refugees.
In this battle, the Pakistani troops were routed. Ten Pakistani 
mercenaries were killed and 30 injured. Two of the Chechen mujahids 
were 
martyred and one captured.
 
Thus we see the final fruits of Musharref's "strategy": Pakistani 
troops 
fighting Islamic mujahideen. The Pakistani armed forces drain the 
Pakistani 
economy to maintain their vast establishment. Money is not available 
for 
HEALTH, EDUCATION or AGRICULTURE because of this vast military system. 
The 
Pakistani people make these sacrifices to liberate Kashmir (the bone of 
contention with India). The Pakistani armed forces have proven 
themselves 
incapable of liberating Kashmir. Instead the Muslim world is aghast at 
the 
phenomenon of Pakistani soldiers helping America, sealing off the 
Afghan 
border, and now getting into an actual fight with the mujahideen from 
Chechnya who are the pride of Islam, the pride of the whole ummah.
EVEN WHEN PAKISTAN WAS NOT IN EXISTENCE AND THE BRITISH RULED 
INDIA, 
THE BRITISH HONORED THE RIGHT OF PATHAN TRIBES TO GIVE SANCTUARY TO 
REFUGEES. 
Musharref, by going into frontier sanctuaries, has taken Pakistan to a 
depth 
lower than that of British rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002-06-28 Fri 12:17ct