[Biggest
Islamic
web site in the
U.S.]
P.O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21087.
Phone: 410-435-5000.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are not necessarily
shared by editorial committee.
Responses (positive or negative) up to 250 words are welcome.
Names will be withheld on request.
--------------------------------------------
Uday and Qusay Go out in Hail of Tow Missiles,
Javelins, 50 MM Mortars: Fight
for 4 Hours
by Buut Shikan (Idol Breaker)
According U.S. army sources, in Mosul, Iraq
on July 22, 2003 the sons
of Saddam Hussain were killed by units of
U.S.
Special Forces and the crack
101st Airborne Division. From the information
released by the U.S., the following
facts can be gleaned:
1. A tip was received by U.S. intelligence from
an Iraqi collaborator. One
report suggests that the spy was a Sh'ite but
this cannot be confirmed.
2. As a result of the four hour fire fight (six
hours according to one
source), four people were killed by U.S. troops.
The U.S. has identified them as
Qusay Hussain, Uday Hussain, Qusay's 14 year old
son and a body guard.
3. The sons of Saddam went down fighting to the
end. There was no attempt to
surrender.
4. The attack was carried out by 200 of America's
best troops, Special Forces
and 101st Air Borne. It was 200 against 4.
5. U.S. troops used dozens of tow missiles,
Javelin rockets, heavy 50 MM
mortars as well as unidentified missiles fired
from helicopters.
6. After the killings, the people of Mosul
demonstrated against U.S. troops'
killing of the two. The demonstration became
serious enough for the U.S.
troops to open fire [which was caught on camera
for 5 seconds].
7. It appears that the Shia areas of Baghdad
celebrated the killing.
8. The
media
dismissed the killing of the 14-year
old as "oh well."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS:
WHY WERE UDAY AND QUSAY KILLED?
Along with the news of the killing of
Saddam's sons, the
Zionist
media
[CNN,
MSNBC,
FOX,
NBC,
ABC,
CBS]
let loose a
barrage of propaganda according
to which the two had committed "terrible crimes"
against Iraqis. One TV
channel claimed that the two had "killed
thousands of Iraqis." Another one claimed
that the two brothers had killed "hundreds."
Another said, they had committed
"rape and murder." Another one said that "Uday
could pick up any woman walking
in the street" if he fancied her.
QUESTION
WHY THIS BARRAGE OF PROPAGANDA? TV viewers often
miss WHY the Zionists put
out these stories. The obvious fact is that the
murder of Saddam's sons by 200
troops is very difficult, if not impossible, to
defend under international law
and Islamic law. NOTE THIS ANALYSIS. No one else
is going to have the courage
to write this:
i. The U.S. did NOT go into Iraq because of the
behavior of Qusay and Uday.
There was NO HUMAN RIGHTS justification claimed
for the invasion. The U.S.
invasion is an ongoing violation of international
law. Even the fig leaf of
Weapons of MD has not hidden anything.
ii. So Qusay and Uday were NOT killed because
they were "brutal" and liked to
drink and womanize. They were killed because they
stood up to the U.S. and
would not cooperate with the U.S. [Compare with
Saddam's two sons-in-law who
worked with the
CIA
to prolong the sanctions on
Iraq. Saddam lured them back and
killed them. They too lived in luxury but were
beloved of the CIA]
iii. There has been NO impartial inquiry which
would indicate that Qusay and
Uday committed the atrocities they are accused of
having committed.
iv. It's quite possible that before 1991, Qusay
and Uday did commit
atrocities, specially during armed uprisings by
pro-Iran
Shi'ites. However, under HOSNI
MUBARAK
of
Egypt,
torture, rape and murder are
quite common against Islamic
opponents of the regime. The U.S. PAYS MUBARAK
$2.8 BILLION EVERY YEAR to keep
it that way. In UZBEKISTAN, another regime
closely linked to the U.S.
routinely carries out torture, rape and murder
against Islamic opponents. Thus the
"atrocities" justification for the killings is
inconsistent. The U.S. does not
fight against anyone for that reason.
v. Similar is the constant propaganda about the
lifestyle of Uday and Qusay.
We repeatedly see Uday's cigars on TV (Cuban?) As
well as Saddam's palaces.
The propaganda seems aimed at gullible Muslims:
They were corrupt, so America
did us a favor by killing them. These Muslims do
not use their brains and think:
If the U.S. fights against corrupt lifestyles,
why is it fighting the saintly
Osama bin Laden who never touches liquor, never
womanizes and lives in a cave?
CONCLUSION:
IT'S ALL ABOUT RESISTANCE. Those who fight back
have to be killed so that a
nation of sheep can be created. DISARM THE
MUSLIMS, and ARM
ISRAEL.
That's the
basic point. An interesting issue to be
looked at in the coming days
will be: Will the resistance end? If it does,
that would mean Qusay and Uday
were responsible. If it continues, it could
support the theory that Islamic
forces are involved in the resistance, if not
entirely controlling it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHIAS in IRAQ: TV viewers are repeatedly told
that SHIAS CONSTITUTE 60% of
the POPULATION. What's the source for this? There
are other sources which say
that Shias are 30% of the population, with Sunnis
50%, Kurds 15% and various
little groups 5%. We hav'nt pinpointed that
source either.
Where is the repeated claim of 60% coming from?
Our readers are encouraged to
let us know.
Is the 60% figure projected to justify Chalabi
and other "yes men" being in
the puppet regime the U.S. is concocting in Iraq?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003-07-23 Wed 19:37ct