[Biggest 
Islamic 
web site in the 
U.S.]
P.O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21087.
Phone: 410-435-5000.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are not necessarily 
shared by editorial committee.
Responses (positive or negative) up to 250 words are welcome.
Names will be withheld on request.
--------------------------------------------
It is the anniversay of Muhammad Iqbal, Poet of 
the East, the visionary who 
taught the concept of 
Pakistan 
as the homeland of 
Islam. He taught about how 
the West tries to destroy Muslim fighting spirit. 
Some of his verses, in 
which Satan addresses his political "children.":
"woh faqa kush keh maut say darta nahin zara
roohe Muhammad iskay badan say nikal do
fikr-e-Arab ko day kay farangi takhaiyyulat
Islam ko Hijaz-o-Yemen say nikal do
Afghaniyon ki ghairate deen ka hay yeh illaj
mullah ko in kay koh-o-dumun say nikal do"
[Trans: The starving  (Muslim) who is not afraid 
of death at all/
take the spirit of Muhammad out of his being/
Give western concepts to the thought patterns of 
the Arabs/
So that Islam may be driven out of Arabia and 
Yemen!/
The solution to the problem of the Afghans' 
self-respect and honor is/
to drive the mullah out of their mountains and 
plains.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Courtesy 
Afghanistan 
list.]
THE 
U.S. 
ADMITS HOLDING AFGHAN CHILDREN in 
GUANTANAMO BAY
Tuesday, April 22, 2003
Children held at Camp Xray, US admits
ABC News
The US military has revealed it is holding 
juveniles at its high-security 
prison for terrorists at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, 
known as Camp Xray.
The commander of the joint task force at 
Guantanamo, Major General Geoffrey 
Miller, says more than one child under the age of 
16 is at the detention 
centre.
 
However, Maj Gen Miller has revealed little more 
about their welfare.
 
Maj Gen Miller says the US is holding "juvenile 
enemy combatants" at the 
centre, confirming rumours of children being 
held.
 
He has refused to reveal how many there are, 
their exact ages or their 
countries 
of origin.
 
He says they are being well cared for and are 
kept in facilities separate 
to adult prisoners.
 
The children are still being interrogated and 
will continue to be held at 
Guantanamo.
 
About 660 prisoners are in the camp.
 
They have not been tried or convicted of any 
offence but are being held as 
part of what the US calls its 
war on terror.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CNN 
and Saddam's Palaces
Dear CNN: You have spent considerable 
energy on photographing Saddam 
Hussain's luxurious palaces. Does this mean that 
you favor simplicity in the 
lifestyle of America's enemies? Should we think 
that if Saddam had lived 
simply, there would have been no invasion?
The Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, 
according to Pakistani sources, 
lived in great simplicity, somewhat like the 
frugal early Caliphs of Islam. 
Somehow CNN never visited Mullah Omar's living 
quarters even after these had 
been captured by the U.S.
I don't want to disillusion you about all 
the effort you spent on 
photographing Saddam's palaces but I'll have to 
because you are much too 
naive for the good of your viewers. Note this 
carefully:
IRAQ IS NOT AFGHANISTAN. Iraq is one of the 
richest countries in the 
world. Those palaces DO NOT REPRESENT MORE THAN 
ONE MONTH of Iraq's oil 
income.
Owing to the SANCTIONS (remember?) Iraq 
could not carry out any 
activity which involved imports. Hence the 
widespread scarcity and 
joblessness. The only work possible with internal 
resources was CONSTRUCTION. 
Hence the work on the PALACES. Saddam gave jobs 
to tens of thousands of 
people by getting these palaces reconstructed 
which had been damaged in 
"coalition bombing."
[Many of these palaces are from Iraq's past.]
Saddam also got ALL of Iraq's highways, 
bridges and damaged buildings 
reconstructed. Before the first Gulf War, Saddam 
used the oil resources to 
develop Iraq as a modern, industrial country 
which could stand up to 
Israel.
So don't make yourself ridiculous by focusing on 
his palaces.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sampling the Pakistani Ruling Class: Why 
Americans Can't Touch Base with Real 
Pakistanis
The Case of Husain Haqqani, Carnegie Institute 
for International Peace
Pakistan's coup leader General Musharref 
used to say that the people 
protesting in the streets against the bombing of 
Afghanistan represent only 
the 5% "extremists." Musaharref himself never 
goes into the streets to find 
out if these people are "extremists" or ordinary 
Pakistanis. He is advised in 
these matters by a vocal but small minority of 
upper middle class people who 
do not share the values and aspirations of the 
Pakistani people. This 
minority is well-placed, itself about 5% of the 
population, in the armed 
forces, the police, the bureaucracy, the 
media 
and in business. Some of these 
are extremists who are openly hostile to Islam 
and see no reason for any 
differences with 
India 
or Israel. Some are 
advocates for provincial and 
linguistic separation from Pakistan (they call it 
'autonomy').
We'll take an example of a westernized 
intermediary between America and 
Pakistan, Husain Haqqani, who is certainly not 
extreme in his views. In his 
mildness, the alienation of the Pakistani elites 
can be seen without 
possibility of it being dismissed as an 
aberration.
Haqqani appeared live for a full hour on 
C-Span, 
April 21, 2003 and 
the tape of his program was repeated the same 
night. The time span allowed us 
to take a fair sample of his views.
What Haqqani did NOT indicate is as 
important as what he said.
1. He did NOT dress as a Pakistani nationalist or 
an Islamist. He was 
well-groomed, with coat and tie, in good taste. 
[Seemed to have worked hard 
on his hair and arched eye brows.]
2. He never gave the impression that as a Muslim, 
he might have values to 
share, or as Pakistani he might have some 
national aspirations to emphasize.
3. He never quoted from the 
Qur'an 
or the 
Hadith. 
By strange reversal, some 
callers asked him about Islam and he could not 
answer. One caller actually 
quoted the Qur'an to him and he was non-plussed.
HAQQANI's VIEWPOINT:
1.  "I feel elated" about Iraq.
2. "Democracy" is most important and he wants a 
conquering power, USA, to 
establish "democracy in Iraq." This American 
effort will "restore 
confidence" in America.
3. RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL IS TO BE TAKEN FOR 
GRANTED, but he wants "a broad 
settlement with Israel" so that 
Palestinian 
rights are not ignored.
People whom Haqqani detests the most:
i. Osama bin Laden. 2. Taliban. 3. Saddam (in 
that order)
VIEWS ON ISLAMIC MOVEMENTS:
Haqqani divides Islamic movements into three 
groups, all three of whom he 
despises because they do not give center place to 
"democracy."
i. Political Islam. These include the Pakistani 
political parties which work 
peacefully but use Israel, Kashmir, etc to stir 
up the people.
ii. Radical Islam. These include Muslim 
Brotherhood in the Middle East and 
Jamaate Islami in Pakistan. These are not to be 
recommended because they do 
not prefer (western style) democracy.
iii. Militant Islam. This includes movements 
which are "not legitimate." 
These include Hamas, Hizbullah and Al-Qaida. They 
have "no support at all."
The most terrible in this entire spectrum of 
Islam is Osama bin Laden and 
many more such could arise if the U.S. does not 
implement "democracy" in the 
Muslim world, says Haqqani. [The idea that Islam 
might have its own worldview 
and program is foreign to Haqqani.]
HAQQANI was often non-factual. For instance, he 
claimed that the CHRISTIAN 
MINORITY IS not WELL TREATED in PAKISTAN.
If Haqqani is the best Pakistan's 
westernized ruling elite can offer, 
it's not too difficult to imagine the thinking of 
run-of-the-mill 
westernized Pakistanis. Owing to this buffer 
between Pakistan and the U.S., 
it's almost impossible for Americans to know what 
Pakistan and Pakistanis are 
really all about.
NOTE: To be a fellow of the Carnegie Institute 
for International Peace, one 
has to be loyal to the American power structure's 
view of the world. The 
Institute is a vehicle for propaganda and 
disinformation, sophisticated in 
its methodology and process.
When American 
media 
want to get an 
"expert's" view of Pakistan and 
other Muslim countries, they look for the 
Carnegie "fellows" and others like 
them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003-04-25 Fri 19:57ct