A stunning Blow for Rejectors of Hadith
They are wrong both about Qur'an and Hadith
by Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D
One of the basic points the munkireen (rejectors) of Hadith 
make 
is that the Prophet (pbuh) himself had forbidden the writing of Hadith. 
They 
even quote the Prophet (pbuh) on this and those who don't know are very 
impressed.
Now note the following points:
1. If the rejectors view of the Qur'an was right (that it has 
everything 
in it, even the details), they would have been able to bring a verse 
from the 
Qur'an which would say: Hadith of the Prophet is not needed when you 
have the 
Qur'an.
They cannot bring such a verse.
So what do they do? They bring a hadith to support their view!
2. They are such liars, that they do not quote the whole hadith. 
Here is 
the complete Hadith. I have italicized the part the rejectors quote:
From Sahih Muslim: "Abu Sa'eed Khudri narrates from the Prophet, 
peace 
and blessings of Allah be on him: Do not write anything from me and 
whoever 
has written anything from me other than the Qur'an should erase it, and 
narrate hadith verbally from me: there is no harm in that (in Arabic WA 
HADATHU 'UNNI WA LA HARAJ), and whoever deliberately tells a lie about 
me 
should make his place in hellfire."
Would it be wrong to assume that the rejectors have made a place 
for 
themselves in hellfire by falsifying these words of the Prophet (pbuh) 
by 
quoting only half the hadith.
Entire books have been written on this subject by the scholars of  Islam. (One easily available in Urdu is IBN MAJA AUR 'ILM-e-HADITH by 
Muhammad Abdur Rasheed Naumani. I read this about 20 years back.)
The Prophet (pbuh) and later Abu Bakr (ra) did not want the 
words of 
the Qur'an and the words of the Hadith to get mixed up with each other. 
Hence 
the WRITING ONLY of Hadith was stopped. Remember that the reciters of 
the 
Qur'an and the narrators of the Hadith were the same people, the 
companions 
of the Prophet (Allah be pleased with them).  In the early stages, the 
danger 
of the two writings getting mixed up was very real.
Even then the ban on writing was not complete. There are numerous 
narrations which indicate that when a companion (sahabi) expressed 
difficulty 
in remembering the Hadith, the Prophet (pbuh) not only allowed him but 
encouraged him to write it down. Thus many Hadith continued to be 
written 
though memorization was the general rule in those early days.
Every companion of the Prophet, including 'Umar and Ali (Allah be 
pleased with them), depended on the Prophet's interpretation, 
explanation and 
implementation of the Qur'an (what we call Hadith of the Prophet). 
Every 
teaching of the Qur'an was elaborated by the Sahaba on the basis of the 
Prophet's Hadith. Thus those who attack the Hadith are attacking the 
entire 
history of Islam. They are trying to destroy the credibility of the 
Sahaba, 
who also are the transmitters of the Qur'an, and thus these munkireen 
do the 
work of the Jews to uproot Islam.
HOW THEY HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD THE QUR'AN: Munkireen (rejectors) 
have 
based their whole theory on the idea that Prophet Muhammad's task was 
ONLY TO 
DELIVER THE QUR'AN.
My dear friend's informant (an unknown named Mabrook Ismaeel, or 
someone 
who hides behind that name), quotes the last part of 24:54 thus: "The 
sole 
duty of the messenger is to deliver." This is a clear distortion of the 
Qur'an if you look at the Arabic original and the context of the verse.
The words "illa balagh al-Mubeen" (only to preach or proclaim 
clearly) 
can in no way be translated as "only ... to deliver."
How do we know that? From the Qur'an itself. In several verses 
the 
Qur'an emphasizes the Prophet's mission to proclaim and preach the 
message 
clearly and unambiguosly so that people can make their choice between 
acceptance or rejection. Islam cannot be imposed on anyone. The Qur'an 
was 
brought to the people by the Prophet. He presented it very honestly and 
clearly to them. Those who accepted, he organized them into a community 
which 
became the model for all future Islamic movements.
For instance 16:82,  follows evidence of Allah's creativity. The 
Prophet 
is then told" "But if they turn away, thy duty is only to preach the 
Clear 
Message." Thus after he has brought them the Qur'an, it's up to them to 
accept or turn away. He cannot put faith in their hearts.
Even when verses on laws about intoxicants and gambling are 
revealed, 
the Qur'an brings out the same idea of the responsibility of the 
audience to 
make  choice, and they will be judged accordingly in the Hereafter. 
Here is a 
verse immediately after the ban on intoxicants and gambling:
     "Obey Allah, and obey the messenger, and beware if you do turn 
back, 
know you that it is our messenger's duty to proclaim the message in the 
clearest manner (al balagh al-mubeen in Arabic)" (5:92)
Thus to claim that because the messenger's duty was to proclaim 
the 
message clearly, he had no other duty is absurd for anyone who has read 
the 
Qur'an. The life, words, actions of the Prophet were interpretations of 
the 
Qur'an. After 5:92, it was his task to remove intoxicants anf gambling 
and 
his actions come to us through the Hadith.
Allah sent the Qur'an with the messenger and together they 
fulfill the 
final message of Allah. In fact, the Prophet (pbuh) comes first and 
through 
him and his sahaba comes the Qur'an.
I will show, inshallah, in a later part of this discussion, that 
there is 
no way the Qur'an can be understood without the Prophet's Hadith. That 
is one 
reason why the Jews and other orientalists remain KUFFAR although they 
have 
become experts in Qur'anic terminolgy: they do not and cannot accept 
the 
Prophet (pbuh) because the Prophet's understanding of the Qur'an brings 
the 
Islamic revolution.
Now let's go back to 24:54 and see how the rejectors have totally 
distorted the Qur'an. (In other words, here I am going from comparison 
with 
other verses to the context of the specific verse the rejector used.) I 
will 
quote 24:54, 55, 56 to bring out the totality of the message:
          Say:"Obey Allah and obey the Messenger: but if ye turn away, 
he is 
only
           responsible for the duty placed on him and you for that 
placed on 
you. If 
           you obey him, you shall be on the right  guidance. The 
Messenger's 
duty is 
          only to proclaim the clear message." Allah has promised to 
those 
among
           you who believe and work righteous deeds, that He will, of a 
surety, grant 
           them in the land inheritance of power, as he granted it to 
those 
before them;
           that He will establish in authority their way of life - the 
one 
which He has
           chosen for them; and that He will change their state, after 
the 
fear in which
           they lived, to one of security and peace: They will worship 
Me 
(alone) and 
           not associate anything with Me. If any do reject faith after 
this, 
they are 
            wicked indeed. So establish prayer and give zakat and OBEY 
THE 
MESSENGER that you may receive mercy.
(emphasis added)
Thus these verses are in fact prophesying the victory of 
Islam, 
under the Prophet and the Sahaba and whenever Muslims follow authentic 
Islam. 
The last verse which I have emphasized mentions obedience to the 
Prophet thus 
shattering our friend's theory that Allah and His messenger only mean 
Allah! 
Does the Prophet here also mean Allah! (astaghfirullah)
After the message has been proclaimed, the righteous who 
accept it 
are being promised  Caliphate (layastakhlifannahum fil Ard  in Arabic).
So there goes the theory that the Prophet (pbuh) was only sent to 
"deliver" and the message and that's it.
I don't know what these MUNKIREEN make of the verses about Jihad 
in 
the Qur'an. If his task was only to deliver the message, what about 
Jihad? Is 
this another Qadiani attempt to abrogate Jihad?
Dear readers, our westernized elites (that is all of us) have 
been 
given a severe case of inferiority complex by the power and glitter of 
the 
west. Some of us fall so low that we start insulting great  Muslims 
like  
hazrat Abu Huraira and Imam Bukhari. (Actually through this process 
such 
people like the munkireen are used by the Jews to attack the very basis 
of 
Islam.) A nation which does not respect its scholars and elders soon 
becomes 
a nation of slaves.
Remember there is no Islam without Hadith.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For our web site go to: www.NewTrendMag.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Video tapes of the International  Islamic Symposium of Jamaat 
al-Muslimeen 
are available for $40 ($10 each) from: New Trend, P.O. Box 356, 
Kingsville, 
MD 21087
===========================================================
Liberation of Women Thru Islam by Dr. Kaukab Siddique is available on 
audio 
tape, read by a sister, for $10 from the New Trend address.
Copiously quoting from the Qur'an and the Hadith, it can break the 
chains of 
mental slavery both among conservatives and liberals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2000-09-15 Fri 11:19ct