New Trend Magazine
(News and Views)
Night Curfew Imposed on Cincinnati, Ohio
Andy Rooney's Insulting Remarks about the Qur'an
Massive Indonesian Demonstration Supports Osama bin Laden
Roots of anti-Taliban Propaganda about Afghan Women Re-visited
{Following the acquittal of a police officer who killed an unarmed 
Black 
youth, there were demonstrations by the Black community in Cincinnati, 
Ohio, 
including clashes with police. As a result, tonight Cincinnati has once 
again 
been placed under night curfew.}
{Our reporter's comment: The Bush administration cannot provide justice 
to 
the people of America but wants to provide "infinite justice" (now 
something 
"freedom" to the Muslims of the world)}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subj: Andy Rooney on "Imus in the Morning" about the Book sacred to 
all 
Muslims
Date:   01-09-28 00:35:34 EDT
From:   KSidd37398@aol.com
To:  news@msnbc.com
Producer MSNBC
(news@msnbc.com)
Dear Producer
Today (September 27), on "Imus in the Morning", 60 Minutes' funny man 
Andy 
Rooney made insulting remarks about the "koran" (the holy Qur'an), the 
book 
which is sacred to 1.2 billion Muslims of the world, including 7 
million in 
the U.S..
Rooney asked Imus:"Have you read the koran? Read it. You'll be 
shocked!" 
While Rooney went through a series of innuendoes and trivialities about 
the 
"koran", your screen showed Muslims prostrating in various mosques 
wearing 
Arab/Pakistani clothes. (The point was: look at those funny people!)
It was obvious that MSNBC was involved in sacrilege: denigrating and 
joking 
about the most sacred source of Islam,  dear to the heart of every 
Muslim.
It bothers me that your station claims, along with President Bush, that 
the 
war being waged is not against Islam but against "terrorism." If that 
is 
true, how can you be so flippant about a Book which is sacred to the 
ENTIRE 
Muslim world?
The Qur'an ("koran"), does contain numerous verses calling on Muslims 
to 
resist oppression, to fight in self-defense and to defeat the powers of 
arrogance and exploitation. Quite probably Rooney discovered these 
verses and 
was duly "shocked."
You owe the Muslim community an apology. The Qur'an ("koran") is part 
of 
Islamic life in America. It is venerated even by Muslims who love 
America. 
Your propaganda will help Muslims to understand that the real war is 
not 
against "terrorism" but against Islam.
Sincerely
Kaukab Siddique, M.A., Ph.D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDONESIA: There have been massive demonstrations in Indonesia against 
the 
United States (Sept.27) and in support of Osama bin Laden. 
Demonstrators 
burned American and Israeli flags. There were nearly 500,000 Muslims in 
the 
streets chanting slogans against America. {MSNBC reported these as 
100,000.}
It is ironic that America's puppet in Indonesia, Ms. Megaputri, was the 
first 
to visit the White House after Sept. 11 and was used to propagate the 
idea 
that Muslims do not support Mujahid Osama.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan: The Pakistani ruler today organized "demonstrations" of his 
own to 
show support for his sell-out to America, in the name of "Solidarity." 
In 
some cities, school children were bused to the "demonstration."
More significantly, the renegade group known as MQM held a 
demonstration in 
Karachi, said to be more than ten thousand strong and condemned 
"religious 
extremists." The gathering was addressed by phone from London by 
renegade 
leader Altaf Hussain. Observers say, the gathering is seen as a signal 
from 
"Great" Britain that Pakistan will be hit from within. The daily Dawn, 
(known 
to Muslims as Pakistan's "jewish" paper) tried to play up the MQM 
gathering 
and inflated its numbers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STORIES ABOUT TALIBAN ATROCITIES AGAINST WOMEN ARE FABRICATIONS. HERE 
IS THE 
EVIDENCE FROM THE TIME THIS CAMPAIGN BEGAN IN A JEWISH PAPER in 
Baltimore in 
JULY 2000
Subj:   Fabrications of anti-Taliban Propaganda Uncovered
Date:   07/09/00
To: letters@baltsun.com
Editor
The Sun
Baltimore, Maryland
Dear editor:
I am concerned about your ongoing campaign against the oppressed 
Muslims of 
the world. During the month of June you published two articles against 
Afghanistan that could have been published only by an editor whose 
knowledge 
of Islam and Afghanistan is ZERO.
The first article on June 11, 2000 (by Lauren Goodsmith) was headlined 
in 40 
point bold letters across four columns: TALIBAN'S YOKE CRUSHES WOMEN 
with a 
subheading which stated UNDER ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS CONTROLLING 
AFGHANISTAN, 
WOMEN ARE DENIED EVEN THE MOST BASIC OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
The article was supported by three photographs (two of them 6 inches by 
8 
inches) of Afghan women in body-shrouding "burqas". Two of these 
photos, 
owing to copyright laws, gave you the lie and showed you up for the 
fabricators you are. The copyright information says in small print:
"Larry C. 
Price/Sun file 1990." As Goodsmith's story points out "the militia 
group 
known as the Taliban SEIZED CONTROL IN 1996."
Thus your paper is trying to convict the Taliban with photos which were 
taken 
10 years before the publication of your story and 6 years before the 
Taliban 
took over.
You have published the story as if it is an eyewitness account, but the 
entire first page gives no source for the vituperation. Only towards 
the end 
of the continuation of the story in the inside page does one get the 
source:
It is a group of Communist women who call themselves "Revolutionary 
Association of the Women of Afghanistan" (RAWA). Two of these women 
wore 
"burqas" and demonstrated in front of the White House in April.
Goodsmith calls this protest by two Communist women "a rally." Can a 
protest 
by two persons be called a "rally" by any twist of the English 
language? 
And you so much wanted to publish against Afghanistan, that two months 
after 
the "rally" you gave it this massive coverage.
(RAWA has a web site, a sickening mess of lies and fabrications, about 
the 
suffering of women in Afghanistan, without any references to dates, 
places, 
persons or any other possibility of verification.)
No Afghan calls himself "revolutionary" owing to the tremendous 
suffering 
imposed by the Soviet "revolutionaries" on Afghanistan. The Soviets, 
with 
their communist allies, like RAWA, inflicted ONE MILLION deaths on the 
people 
of Afghanistan, a higher death ratio than that inflicted by the Nazis 
on 
Russia during World War II.
These "revolutionary" women are from the Khalq and Parcham factions of 
Afghan 
Communists. They were taught to hate their people. Khalqis had to 
literally 
WALK on the QUR'AN to be granted membership. (See "Afghanistan Under 
the Red 
Flag" by Robert Neumann, American Foreign Policy Institute, 1979). 
Under 
Communist rule, the Kabul regime used to put out propaganda similiar to 
what 
RAWA gave to your Goodsmith.
These chadris and burqas are common to some urban areas of 
Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. They are part of the 
culture. 
One does not have to agree with the culture (I don't) to know that it 
has 
nothing to do with the "TALIBAN'S YOKE." One might as well go to 
Daytona 
Beach, take photographs of the bikini clad women in their disgusting 
thousands and then claim that American women are immoral and shameless.
Not: 
that's just the culture!
One does not "liberate" Afghan women by taking them out of 
burqas, 
removing their headcovers and putting them into skirts. Jan Goodwin in 
her 
book on Afghanistan Caught in the Crossfire has an interesting photo of 
Communist Afghan militia women in Kabul lifting a Muslim woman's burqa 
on the 
pretense of finding out if one of the mujahideen was lurking there. 
(Muslim 
women supported the armed struggle with their lives.) The Communist 
occupiers 
wore skirts and uncovered their heads. The lesson of Afghanistan 
(written 
with the blood of a million martyrs) is that one does not become free 
by 
becoming westernized.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your second article, dated June 23, 2000, "Quiet subversion 
by 
Afghans" written by Karen Mazurkewich is even more absurd. This woman 
actually went to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan to write against the 
Taliban. She 
didn't have the honesty to admit that if the Taliban had been against 
women, 
they wouldn't have allowed her to be galivanting all over their 
territory 
ALONE.
She has the temerity to publish a photo of Afghan women with 
uncovered faces undergoing education while claiming that the education 
is 
"secret" and the Taliban are against it. How dishonest can she be when 
she 
admits in the same article that she was going around with a 
"Taliban-appointed translator." Thus a Taliban man was telling all that 
she  
"found out"!
Compare what she wrote about the Taliban soldiers with what many 
others 
have written over the last two decades about Afghan fighters. These are 
easy-going Muslim men who are great fighters but definitely not tyrants 
or 
crazy extremists.  She refers to the "heavily armed Taliban sentries" 
and 
when they do not mistreat her and do not confiscate her film, she 
claims they 
are turning against Taliban rule! She admits that the Taliban have 
"allowed a 
handful of female doctors and nurses to work in segregated hospitals."
Her comments are extremely unfair because she leaves out the 
fact 
that doctors, male or female, are in short supply in Afghanistan. Also, 
Afghan women, like most Muslim women, prefer to be touched by female 
doctors 
than by males. (I would say that is true of many good Christian and 
Jewish 
women in America too.)
The horror stories about Taliban rule have only this much basis 
in 
fact: When the Taliban took Kabul, they destroyed the bottles of wine 
found 
there and imposed strict restrictions on women's movement in the 
streets. 
Historically Kabul has been the center of Afghan Communism. From here 
the 
waves of repression were launched at the homes, families and mosques of 
the 
Afghan people. Kabul radio kept up a non-stop barrage of lies and 
disinformation against Islam and the freedom-loving people of 
Afghanistan.
After the fall of Kabul to Prof. Rabbani, the Kabuli 
Communists 
were not punished because  Engr. Hikmatyar's forces were knocking at 
the 
door. Thus the punishment for the Communists came only with the fall of 
Kabul 
to the Taliban. They were extra-strict with those "revolutionary" 
(actually 
godless anti-people) women. However, comparison with other occupations 
of 
enemy cities in recent history (Berlin by the Russians, Nuremburg by 
the 
Americans, Jerusalem by the Zionists, Algiers by the French, Delhi by 
the 
British 1857, Khartoum under the Mahdi by the British, Tripoli by the 
Italians) indicates that the Taliban have been very civilized and 
well-behaved. Even the friendly presence of American troops in Saigon 
turned 
that city into a vast brothel.
All that the enemy population's women in Kabul had to do was 
wear the 
burqa and they were safe from all molestation.
I would suggest that Goodsmith and Mazurkewich look to the 
condition of 
women in America and try to win safe streets for women in major 
metropolises 
after 12 am, rather than going off into nations where they simply are 
at sea.
By the way, what is the religion of "Karen" and "Lauren"? When 
they 
attack other people's religion, should they not in all honesty reveal 
their 
own? I suspect they belong to the Tribe which controls most of 
America's 
"liberal" media.
Sincerely
Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.newtrend.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allah hu! Allah hu! la illaha illa hu!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Urdu language chants:
Meri aan, teri aan: TAALIBAN, TAALIBAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------
yahood-o-hunood ka aik jawab: al-jihaad, a-jihaad
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan's leading {armed} Kashmir-liberation movement, Lashkare Taiba, 
has 
published an important Islamic ruling against cooperation with the 
kuffar who 
are building up forces to attack Afghanistan. We'll bring to you with 
our 
next posting.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001-11-07 Wed 13:15ct