[Biggest 
Islamic 
web site in the 
U.S.]
P.O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21087.
Phone: 410-435-5000.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are not necessarily 
shared by editorial committee.
Responses (positive or negative) up to 250 words are welcome.
Names will be withheld on request.
--------------------------------------------
THE BULLY IN THE CHINA SHOP
Understanding 
Bush's 
Korea Policy: U.S. Opposes 
Korean Unity
Why Does North Korea Need its Nuclear Program?
by Edward Miller, MD, San Rafael, California
The Bush Administration's aggressive public 
relations campaign against 
North Korea is another example of the dangerous  
immaturity of our President.  
Making off-the-cuff remarks regarding the leader 
of another country, and 
calling names is behavior inexcusable even in a 
local politician, and doubly  
dangerous when it is the head of state that 
lapses into such childishness.  
The fact that our Washington-subservient 
media 
has cooperated in this 
name-calling is but another reflection on the 
lack of a really free press in our 
country.  Hidden from the American public in all 
this bru-ha-ha, is the fact 
that Washington, not Kim Jon II that is largely 
to blame for what has become 
a dangerous and unnecessary political and 
military stand-off.
Kim Jon II, the present leader of North Korea's 
communist government has been 
brought up under an umbrella of real or 
threatened nuclear warfare.  When 
Kim was only three, the atomic clouds from 
Hiroshima and Nagasaki drifted over 
his Korean peninsula.  Eight years later when 
Kim Jon was approaching his 
teens, and toward the end of the Korean War 
while the US with Un forces were 
still  ravaging Kim's country, our General  
Dougles MacArthur requested 
authority to use atomic weapons and submitted a 
list of targets for which he 
would need 26 A-bombs.  These requested A-bombs  
were to be employed against  
North Korean targets as well as the Chinese, who 
were gathering some 600,000 
troops just north of the Yalu River to both  
face off with MacArthur as well as 
to protect China's several electric generator 
plants in the Yalu which 
served a good one/third of eastern China's 
industrial and domestic needs.
MacArthur's successor, General Matthew Ridgeway 
repeated MacArthur's 
request but such weapons were never used.  
Fortunately for us, President Truman 
and his military advisors in Washington denied  
the requests.  However, the 
newly-elected President Eisenhower, according to 
author Don Oberdorfer (see 
his book: THE TWO KOREAS) claimed that his own 
threats in 1953 to use 
nuclear weapons "played a major role in 
bringing about a truce."  When Clinton 
took over as president there were still nuclear 
weapons in the armament of US 
occupying forces in South Korea.  The Korean War 
from US' point of view 
started im 1950 and ended with an armistice on 
the 27th of July, 1953.  US 
casualties totaled 54,200 and Korean casualties 
(the majority civilian) over 
3 million.  North Korea was decimated and her 
economy reduced towards 
starvation levels.
Back in the mid 1940's  during the Clinton years, 
, North Korea, still  
impoverished from the ravishes of the Korean War, 
plus the limitations set by its  
communist economy and  sorely needing  an energy 
source to drive its  
still-primitive industrial machine, had been 
partially dependent on two small 
atomic reactors, a 5 megawatt and a 30 megawatt,   
built with the help of Russian 
and Chinese engineers.   Lacking the cash to 
purchase even heating and 
cooking oil for his people, Kim Jon's father 
found himself forced to 
dismantle his aging 30-megawatt atomic reactor  
in order to refurbish its then  
inefficient fuel rods.  It was the abundant 
uranium 237 present in those 8000 
discarded fuel rods, that waved a red flag in 
Washington and started the 
first of several confrontations.
John Oberdorfer in his book THE TWO KOREAS says 
that "North Korea's nuclear 
debut dated back to 1982, when an American 
surveillance 
satellite...photographed what appeared to be a 
nuclear reactor vessel under construction 
...at Yongbyon...sixty miles north of the 
capitral...Photographs taken in June 
1984 clearly showed the reactor, its cooling 
tower, and some limited power 
lines and electric grid connections for local 
transmission..."Old-style 
reactors of the so-called "heavy-water" type 
produce as a by-product of activity 
large amounts of U-237 which is rather easily 
converted into the plutonium 
used in building atomic weapons.  It was this 
potential weapons use to 
which the Clinton Administration, and now Bush, 
Jr. has responded.
Had Washington dealt intelligently with the 
situation, and offered Kim Jon 
II, who had taken over the leadership from his 
father, friendly advice and 
assistance, things might well have different, 
but instead, Washington 
began accusing North Korea of planning nuclear 
weapons and Clinton even 
threatened Kim Jon II with nuclear reprisal, 
and began running B-52 "trial runs" 
over North Korea from US bases in both Okinawa 
and Taiwan.  Things got so 
out of hand that ex-president Jimmy Carter and 
ex- defense Secretary William 
Perry volunteered to step in and diffuse the 
situation.
The so-called "Agreed Framework" ironed out 
with the help of Carter, 
William Perry and Kim Jon II's government, 
included three promises from 
Washington: 500,000 barrels of fuel-cooking 
oil/ year, a revision of the political 
relations between the two countries, and the 
construction by the year 2003 
of two light-water, "Westinghouse-Type", 1000 
megawatt atomic reactors by 
the Unites States, to assist the North Koreans in 
establishing an energy 
base for their nascent economic recovery. 
North Korea agreed not to process 
plutonium from the 8000 rods in its aging 30 
megawatt reactor.
Fast forward to October 2002.  Bush junior, now 
president, rather than 
working towards the agreed "normalization of 
political and economic relations" not 
only neglects North Korea, but shortly after 
assuming office publicly 
humiliates  South Korea's president Kim Dae Jung 
(now ex-president) during Kim's 
Washington visit, since the Korean president's 
"sunshine policy" of Korean 
reunification runs counter to Washington's need 
for an excuse to keep the two 
Koreas at loggerheads and so excuse those 37,000 
US troops in  Kim's country.
In the next move, Bush publicly announced that 
North Korea had been 
advanced from a "Rogue State" to join 
Iraq 
and 
Iran 
in Washington's "Axis of Evil".
By October of 2002 North Korea's Kim Jon II, 
whose people have been waiting 
since the 1994 "Agreed Framework" for much 
needed electrical energy from the 
promised two 1000 megawatt reactors, complained  
that neither reactor had 
been brought online, and in fact, only the 
concrete foundation of one had been 
constructed.  In an understandable snitt, Kim 
Jon II announced he would 
reactivate his aging 30 megawatt reactor at 
Pyongyang while publicly 
acknowledging plans to extract some residual 
plutonium from discarded rods.  Kim 
also removed the IAEA surveillance cameras and 
slammed the door shut on further 
UN inspectors.  Bush originally raised the hype 
on the plutonium-missile 
issue to boost his own Star Wars program, but as 
international attention was 
drawn to Washington's absolute failure to keep 
its part of the 1994 "Agreement 
Framework", Bush temporarily quieted down.  In 
October 2002 North Korea openly 
admitted they were restarting their weapons 
program, a violation of the 1994 
Agreement with Washington under which North 
Korea agreed to freeze its 
weapons activities.
The refusal of Bush to negotiate with Kim Jon 
II places the North Koreans 
in a dilemma.  With a population in economic 
collapse, and badly in need of 
electric power, both to serve their cities as 
well as support the Kaae Sung 
Industrial Park under construction at their 
border with South Korea, 
Bush's refusal to move forward with the "Agreed 
Framework" and deliver the two 
promised atomic reactors can only fuel the North 
Korean's anger.  Add to 
this the not-so-subtle hints from Washington of 
a military strike against 
their atomic facility by a US still nominally 
at war with North Korea (the 
US has refused to renegotiate the Armistice 
signed in 1957), and you have 
the potential for a dangerous confrontation.  
To add fuel to the fire, the 
Bush Administration has threatened to press 
Japan to ban the millions of 
yen North Koreans depend on from their Korean 
relatives living in Japan.  If 
this weren't frustrating enough, the Asia Times 
(July 12th) reported a 
meeting of more than 100 defense and diplomatic 
representatives from Australia, 
France, 
Germany, 
Italy, Japan, Portugal, Spain, 
the United Kingdom and the US 
in Brisbane, to consider a Proliferation 
Security Initiative (PSI) measure 
aimed at to intercepting  both ships on the high 
seas as well as cargo 
planes from those so-called "Axis of Evil" 
countries, when carrying what the US 
considers as "contraband" items such as missiles 
or even drugs from North Korea 
to either Yemen or Iran.  This act which many 
see as "international piracy" 
will simply add fuel to the fire.
Kim Jon II's supposed "nuclear renewal" 
threat beside  attracting world 
attention to Washington's abject failure to 
honor its 1994"  Agreed 
Framework" has another interesting aspect.  
North Korean officials have publicly 
noted that the United States has felt free to 
attack countries such as 
Yugoslavia and Iraq which had no nuclear 
arsenals, thus logic says the possession 
of nuclear arms by their country could deter 
the US from considering a 
nuclear confrontation in the Asian theater.
While Bush may hope to achieve support for his 
"Star Wars" initiative by 
this nuclear confrontation with Kim Jon II, he 
has gained no approval from 
either Kim's Asian neighbors, the UN or our 
European allies, all of whom are 
pressing Washington to negotiate directly with 
North Korea.  Washington's 
threat to seek a Security Council's condemnation 
of North Korea has gone nowhere, 
though Bush bought off China's threatened 
veto by backing Beijing's 
admission to the 
WTO 
(World Trade Organization) 
despite China's abysmal human 
rights record.
All in all, Washington's failure to honor the 
"Agreed Framework", its 
public inclusion of North Korea in the "Axis of 
Evil,"  its threats of 
military and even nuclear reprisal, and its 
talk of both a blockade plus 
international piracy both on the high seas and in 
the air are alarming our Asian 
friends, particularly the South Koreans.  North 
Korea has over 1 million 
soldiers, and a massive artillery as well as 
missile array just north of the DMZ 
which is less than 30 miles from Seoul, a city 
containing over 50% 0f South 
Korea's population and not that far from the 
Japanese islands.  No wonder 
Bush's hardline policy towards Kim Jong II 
frightens our Asian friends.  Even 
Prime Minister Tony Blair, in Washington this 
week cautioned Bush : "We need 
to resolve the issue by peaceful and constructive 
dialogue...with talks that 
include South Korea and Japan as well as China 
and America."  Meanwhile South 
Korea's president Ron Moo Hyun tried to play down 
the international alarm over 
North Korea's nuclear threats by praising the 
United States for "Putting 
pressure on Pyongyang, while maintaining a 
"friendly attitude."  (Independent 
News. co.uk  21 July, 2003)  The question is: 
Will our bully listen?
As for the so-called North Korean missile crisis 
, our own US military is 
purchasing from at least five missile 
manufacturers in the US and Britain:   
Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon Systems,  
Megatech, and British Aero-space, 
as well as US firms which share manufacturing  
with 
Israel.  
All these 
companies are free to sell abroad except to 
those "Axis of Evil" countries.  
Trying by threats to limit Kim Jon II's 
missile sales is foolish, as was 
Washington's recent move to slap sanctions on 
both a Chinese (NORINCO) and an 
Iranian (SHAHID HERMAT) missile company for 
"helping the Islamic government 
in Tehran modernize and expand its missile 
arsenal."  Both companies also 
provided missile-related items to North Korea. 
(globalsecurity.org 21 july).
Washington's move was obviously instigated by 
our Israeli lobby.  Experience 
has shown that both missiles and missile parts 
can and are being smuggled 
across borders anywhere in the world.  The US is 
by far the world's largest 
seller of this military hardware.
20 July, 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003-08-09 Sat 22:25ct