NewTrendMag.org
 
News
 # 
1251
[
Click on NEWS for back issues
][
OUR BOOKS
]
Zulqi'dah 29,1429/ November 28, 2008, #60
Scroll down 
all the way for the khutba on Mumbai. You'll be 
surprised, shocked!
Our America: [1]
New Trend Analysis by Dr. Kaukab Siddique
Shameful Verdict Against Holy Land Foundation [HLF]: 
Zionist Hand Blocking Relief Funds for Palestinian Widows and 
Orphans What HLF Should Have Done and What U.S. Muslims 
Should Do
Families Mourning after Conviction of Five Innocent Muslims 
who sent Humanitarian Relief to Palestine
November 25, 2008: In Dallas, five Muslims working for the 
Holy Land Foundation [HLF] were found guilty of funnelling 
$12 million to Hamas, the Islamic resistance movement which 
refuses to recognize the terrorist entity known as Israel as 
a legitimate state. It was a re-trial. The first time, the 
government failed to convict! So, the prosecution re-worked 
its case and made sure it would fit this time. The jury was 
"advised" on what "guilty" meant. Gone are the days when 
America declared that it was a nation of laws and guilt had 
to be proven BEYOND a REASONABLE DOUBT.
The U.S. government declared in 1995 that Hamas is a 
terrorist organization. After that it was only a matter of 
time before American Jews and the Zionist power bloc which 
runs America would find Palestinians sending money to 
Palestine and have them brought to trial.
Most IMPORTANT about the convictions is the fact that the 
court did NOT find the defendants in any way actually 
involved with the militant activities of Hamas. They were 
convicted for sending HUMANITARIAN RELIEF. The way the 'Law' 
has been shaped is that if the humanitarian relief helps the 
widow or child of a person supporting Hamas, then that 
humanitarian relief is a form of support for terrorism! Even 
worse, if the humanitarian relief helps the child of a 
martyrdom operator [suicide bomber in Jew talk], then that 
is almost as good as terrorism! The child is seen by the 
Jews as a potential terrorist.
An objective reporter would find the convictions laughable. 
Israel gets billions of dollars every year from the U.S. for 
its military occupation of Palestine. In addition, Jewish 
Americans fund Israel, including terrorist "settlements," 
which even the UN [which created Israel} sees as illegal. 
Just about every Synagogue and Rabbi [with few exceptions] 
supports the terrorist entity known as Israel.
Israel has stronger military forces than all the Arab 
armies combined.
In that background, when a court sees humanitarian relief for 
widows and orphans as support for terrorism, can it be 
called anything other than laughable? This "justice" is a 
joke perpetrated on people whose "sin" is that they are 
Muslims, Arabs and Palestinians.
Why did this happen?
Holy Land Foundation [HLF] and other groups within the ambit 
of the Muslim Brotherhood [ikhwan] have made some serious 
compromises with the American power structure. They have 
certainly never been opposed to U.S. imperialism. They dumped 
the teachings of Sayyid Qutb [shaheed]. When Anwar Sadat 
betrayed Islam and Palestine and was killed by Khalid 
al-Islambouli [r.a.], the Brotherhood [Ikhwan] movement 
outright condemned the execution of Sadat.
Since then, the Brotherhood movement has lost its appeal for 
most Muslims, especially the poor and the oppressed, the 
masses. However, among the Egyptian elites and conservative 
Palestinians, it gained support. In America, the Brotherhood 
movement could be glimpsed in the groupings known as ISNA and 
CAIR. They are ardent supporters of the American power 
structure and walk in lock step with the U.S. government.
The Brotherhood people strictly avoided criticism of Israel 
and behaved consistently as if Israel is a legitimate entity. 
CAIR went out on a limb to condemn Iran's venture that the 
holocaust story should be discussed and, 
perhaps, investigated.
The political stance of ISNA-CAIR can be described as 
"Muslim" Zionism or more simply as a bunch of Muslims who 
think peace with Israel is possible. They reached out to 
American Jews as they did to the FBI.
Like CAIR, HLF too was staunchly pro-U.S. government. Its 
humanitarian help for needy Palestinians was strictly 
non-political, patterned after the Ikhwan's work in Egypt. 
HLF did not realize that Jewish Zionists wanted to monopolize 
the love of Uncle Sam and did not want any Muslims, however 
subservient, to be part of the picture. Hence an internal 
tussle began between "Muslim" Zionists and Jewish Zionists. 
Daniel Pipes, Steve Emerson and others fought to monopolize 
the master's attention. They condemned ISNA and CAIR as 
supporters of "terrorism" [a code word for Hamas].
When the Jewish lobby managed to get Hamas listed as a 
terrorist organization, ISNA and CAIR should have protested, 
but they did nothing. However, HLF, confident that its love 
of Uncle Sam would save it from persecution continued to 
collect charity for Palestine. Even after 9.11 the HLF people 
kept on being careless about sending money to Palestine. They 
did not realize that Israel was now leading America by 
the nose.
HLF, CAIR, ISNA etc have no grassroots support among 
America's 5 to 7 million Muslims. They haven't tried to get 
this support. They do conferences and fund raisers which 
attract the VERY RICH, the thin upper crust of the Muslim 
communities. Go to mosques across the country, ISNA-CAIR are 
just about unknown except in the fancy multi-million dollar 
mosques in suburbia.
The Zionist Jews tripped them up. There was NO Muslim 
response of any significance when HLF was raided by the 
"authorities." The Muslim communities are alienated against 
the Ikhwan types who sided with the regime in the case of 
both the Blind Shaikh and Imam Jamil. Ahmed Abdel Sattar's 
wife wrote repeatedly to CAIR and did not get even a formal 
reply. CAIR told Dr. Kifah al-Jayyousi's wife: We do not deal 
with criminal cases. Outraged, she retorted, my husband is 
not a criminal.
What should U.S. Muslims do?
Remember that America's Jews, with few exceptions, are 
enemies of Islam and Muslims. Do not try to hob nob with 
them. "Imam" Magid [ISNA VP}, Syed Syeed and other "useful 
idiots" who visit Synagogues and befriend Rabbis lack the 
ability and courage to think Islamically. After committing 
genocide in 1948, the Zionist Jews are out to destroy the 
remaining Palestinians who are still in Gaza and the West 
Bank. They are also working hard against Islam in Africa, 
Iran and Pakistan.
The HLF convictions indicate that for the Jews, a donation 
for a Palestinian child is a form of terrorism!
We Muslims have a basis for unity: The Qur'an and the Sunnah 
are our foundation. We cannot become strong by joining the 
Democratic Party. We should form a 7 million strong Islamic 
bloc. One thing we can do without any problem: Boycott all 
major busnesses supporting Israel, withdraw from all business 
with Jews. Is your doctor or your lawyer a Jew? Most probably 
he helps Israel. Check it out.
The government has taken $12 million from HLF. Let us take 
it back from the Jews by boycotting businesses which 
support Israel.
Step two: Our political stance should be: ISRAEL IS A 
TERRORIST ENTITY which has occupied Palestine by force of 
arms. Teach the American people. Educate, organize, mobilize 
but strictly within the law and by peaceful means only.
Our America: [2]
Obama is not a friend to Muslims; he may prove to be even 
worse? than Bush
by Balquis Charles
Before you delete please consider these thoughts and passages: 
Pass this on to Muslims, esp. those of us who are of 
African descent
- 
As Muslims we are obligated to do something to help the 
suffering Palestinians.(a)
 - 
Obama is not a friend to Muslims; he may prove to be even worst 
than Bush.(b)
 - 
Is Obama surrounding himself with zionists and supporters 
of Israel?(c)
 
* I send this first passage to remind us of the suffering of 
Muslims and our obligation to them. Make dua to Allah to help 
the Palestinians, and pass this on:
(a) "It is Israel that breached the truce and its ongoing 
aggression against Gaza belies its claim that it is committed 
to the truce and intent on sustaining it," he said with 
passion. "The occupation destroyed the ceasefire. It did not 
abide by a single article of the truce. Therefore, it is our 
right and the right of all the resistance factions to respond 
with all possible force in order to protect our people and our 
Palestinian land. No Israeli soldier or settler on this land 
should have the right to safety and security as long as our 
people are being subjected to aggression and siege. They should 
be made to live among their own crippled and wounded so as to 
experience what the people of Gaza feel."....
According to UN sources, it would take some 900 truckloads per 
week -- 150 truckloads a day -- of food and other essentials to 
meet the minimal primary needs of the Palestinians in Gaza, 
where around three-quarters of the inhabitants are without the 
electricity and the fuel needed to operate refrigerators and 
cooking equipment. The complete closure that Israel has imposed 
on Gaza has also led to a severe shortage in medicines. The 
human rights organisation, Addameer (Conscience), has warned 
that the lives of dozens of patients in intensive care units in 
Gaza and other patients who require oxygen tanks are at 
serious risk"
http://www.aqsa.org.uk/HOME/tabid/36/ctl/Details/mid/427/ItemID/1872/language/en-US/Default.aspx
*Obama is not our friend:
(b) In the speech, given at the annual conference of the 
American-Israel Political Action Committee, or AIPAC Obama 
stated that he would give the disputed city of Jerusalem to 
Israel without any negotiation. IMEMC reporter Saed Bannoura 
spoke with Professor Naseer Aruri about the implications of 
Obama's speech.
http://www.imemc.org/article/55367
*Obama and his zionist team:
(c) Rahm Emanuel is a zionist Israeli Jew. Who returns to 
Israel to fulfil his military duty:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/newsfull.php?newid=186252
Yes, this may hurt or sadden you, but we are Muslims. I am of 
African descent, and it took me a couple of weeks to get the 
courage to admit that Obama isn't halal for us. We saw it when 
they barred the Muslim sisters from sitting on the stage during 
his campaign. We should never put any hope in the Kuffar: even 
if he is our brother!!
Our America: [3]
"vile and despicable" Jeremiah Wright --- 
caution advised?!
For Peace, Talk to al-Qaidah: Find out what al-Zawahiri Knows.
by Naim AbdurRafi [New York]
This happened a day or so ago. It was either on CNN or MSNBC. 
One of the talking heads referred to the Reverend Wright with 
these terms. No eyebrows raised. Not those of the other 
talking heads, not those of the moderator--one of the ladies 
I believe.
WE know there is nothing vile or despicable about our brother 
or about anything he has said. We know also that the 
indictments he leveled at our country are at least plausible. 
(Some of us are old enough to know that the indictments 
are true.)
Here's what most of us don't know. The same people who despise 
Dr. Wright are those who would have us equate the racist 
"A-RAB" with the Muslim. Yes, the A-RAB is someone who might 
say about our president-elect that he is a "house negro" and 
mean something racist or otherwise demeaning.
Ayman al-Zawahiri strikes me as being a Muslim. He may be an 
Arab. I don't know. Doesn't matter. He is not a a racist 
"A-RAB." If he did indeed refer to President Obama as a "house 
negro" we must understand that there is a sense in which the 
epithet fits.
Yes, tears came to my eyes upon learning Barack Obama had won. 
And I have great faith in his ability and sincerity, in his 
being the person the country needs at this time.
But like us all, he knows only as much as he knows. And he does 
not know what Brother al-Zawahiri knows. I am certain "house 
negro" was designed to provoke reflection. Hopefully it reached 
its mark, and our president is guided to understand that the 
most sensible thing he can do is to invite Al-Qaeda to the 
table--so lives and treasures can be spared--and so he can come 
to know what al-Zawahiri knows.
But that would be a bold, even dangerous, thing for Brother 
Barack to do. That being the case WE must do it. Those of us 
who understand that there is nothing vile about the Reverend 
Wright or his pronouncements should DEMAND that President Obama 
call Al-Qaeda to the table. Maybe there is something to be 
learned. Maybe peace can be given a chance.
Best wishes,
http://deencom.com
Letter: Re: Blitzer's Blunder etc. 
[
New Trend Nov. 23 issue
] 
in TWO WORDS
Salam
Wonderful issue.
Bilquis [Maryland]
Letter: RE: McCarthyism n Marin: American Jews Attack Free 
Speech trying to shut down a small paper: Daniel Pipes at Work
I would think there should be some legal remedies for this 
kind of witch-hunting and arms-twisting. A case can be made for 
contraminding the process of freedom of press, speech and 
thought. It is time the so-called anti-Semitism should be 
challenged to exclude criticism of Israel as a nation.
Regards
Ghulam Muhammad [India]
Most Muslims Missed this
Egyptian Dictator Mubarak Visits India, with high level 
Entourage, and Gets Highest Indian Award
"The conferment of the Jawaharlal Nehru Award for International 
Understanding on Mubarak as one of the Arab world's most 
moderate and level-headed leaders in a especially uproarious 
region was replete with symbolism. "My current visit to India 
comes to give a new, strong momentum to our historic relations 
and partnership," President Hosni Mubarak told his 
Indian hosts.
The usual response of an Egyptian to the announcement of the 
name of an Indian dignitary or distinguished personality that 
made their name in the international arena is "who?" The 
exclamation itself is no surprise, for Egypt has long looked 
westwards. Yet eyebrows were raised both by the timing and the 
size of Mubarak's entourage. Mrs Suzanne Mubarak accompanied 
the president to India and so did Foreign Minister Ahmed 
Abul-Gheit, Minister of Trade Rachid Mohamed Rachid, Minister 
of Communications and Information Technology Tarek Kamel and 
Minister of Information Anas El-Fiqi.
[Al-Ahram, Cairo, Nov. 23]
Background to the case against Dr. Omar 'Abdel Rahman [the 
blind Shaikh]
Interview with Defense Lawyer Ron Kuby on FBI role in 
WTC bombing of 1993
The Role of the Informer, Egyptian Agent Emad Salem: Shaikh 
Omar was Victim of FBI entrapment
Written by Husayn Al-Kurdi [Chicago]
http://sonic.net/~doretk/ArchiveARCHIVE/HUSAYN%20AL-KURDI/Interview%20with%20Ron%20Kuby.html
Ron Kuby, a partner of the renowned William Kunstler, has been 
the defense lawyer most involved in defending the people who 
are being swept up in "muslim conspiracy" trials which followed 
the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York. Although the 
government's official story keeps changing, with most of the 
media following course, it remains clear, as I have reported in 
previous articles, that the bombing of the World Trade Center 
and the incitement of various people to commit illegal acts is 
the responsibility of one Emad Salem, an FBl informant and 
sometime Egyptian government operative. During my interview 
with Kuby, the nature of the witch-hunts being directed towards 
Muslims was clarified as he showed how the "conspiracy" was of 
GOVERNMENT origin, with informant, Judge, prosecution and media 
all dutifully playing their parts.
Q. Was there anything in my previous articles on the World 
Trade Center bombing and the subsequent "conspiracy" trial that 
requires amendation, correction or amplification?
A. The article on the FBl being involved in the World Trade 
Center bombing actually UNDERSTATED the evidence, believe it or 
not. The informer, Emad Salem, is actually on tape saying that 
he built the bomb that ultimately blew up the World 
Trade Center.
In addition, we have received information that he was visually 
observed at the scene of the bombing shortly after the bombing 
took place. Shortly after that, he was admitted to the 
hospital, suffering from an ear problem that was consistent 
with exposure to blast.
Also, we know that he had a motive to blow up the World Trade 
Center, the motive being that he had been dealing with the FBl 
since at least November 1991, trying to convince the FBl that 
he had infiltrated a cell of radical Muslims, trying to get the 
FBl to pay him for his information. He kept going to the FBl 
with ever more hysterical statements about bombs and 
explosives. In the summer of 1992, the FBI, after apparently 
giving him a lie-detector test, refused to believe him anymore 
and cut him loose.
He needed a payoff. What better way for this sociopath, a 
conscienceless human being, than to actually bomb the World 
Trade Center? Indeed, within hours of the bombing, the FBl was 
back on the phone to him, promising him anything and everything 
if only he would help them crack the case. The FBl, having set 
this maniac loose, bears some of the responsibility for 
what happened.
Q. When did Emad Salem start to work for them?
A. We don't know precisely. We do know he was affiliated with 
Egyptian intelligence for quite some time. The FBl officially 
acknowledges that Emad Salem began to work for them in November 
1991, during the trial of Sayyid Nosair, at which Nosair was 
found not guilty of murdering Rabbi Meir Kahane. It was at that 
point that he infiltrated himself into the group supporting 
Sayyid Nosair. It was Emad Salem, as early as December of 1991, 
who was telling groups of these people that they should become 
more militant. At one point Emad Salem suggested they throw 
Molotov cocktails at a synagogue, at which the people listening 
were absolutely horrified and refused to have anything to do 
with him. After that, he toned down his rhetoric.
Q. What is the current situation, in the wake of the 
sentencing in the World Trade Center bombing conspiracy trial?
A. You will recall that all of these defendants, with the 
exception of one, were denied counsels of their choice. The 
Judge refused to appoint any of these lawyers because he didn't 
like them. He didn't want any activist movement political 
lawyers. So they had to leave the case and were replaced by 
this second-rate and even third-rate legal team. There was a 
disastrous defense which did everything wrong that could be 
done wrong. After the defendants were convicted, they fired all 
their lawyers and said they wanted William Kunstler and Ron 
Kuby. The Judge refused to allow us to enter the case. Judge 
Kevin Duffy, a longtime adversary of William Kunstler, wanted 
to keep control of the defense in the same way as he kept 
control over the prosecution. On sentencing day, we were even 
excluded from the courtroom.
Q. Reports have it that Sidig Ali, one of the defendants in the 
NEXT New York Muslim Conspiracy trial, is turning on everyone. 
What's the score on that?
A. The government got to him through terror or promises or 
both. They were able to get him and turn him into a government 
witness. As a result, we no longer represent him. The 
government is using that as a way of throwing us off the case 
entirely. There is no doubt in my mind that the Judge is going 
to do exactly that.
They used to point to Sidig Ali as the "mastermind." Now Ramzi 
Yusef (recently captured in Pakistan and brought to the U.S.) 
is the "mastermind," according to what they're putting out 
through the media.
It varies with the season. Originally it was just the group of 
four who blew up the World Trade Center, then it expanded and 
contracted and expanded again. It's one of those permanent 
crimes-they just keep pasting new heads on their Wanted list.
They expect people to forget what they said just a week ago. 
They spent a year trying to convince the American people that 
Sidig Ali is the biggest terrorist who ever lived. Now they 
turn around and try to portray him as some kind of born-again 
American patriot.
Q. Where does that leave the defense of Sheikh Omar 
Abdel Rahman?
A. It's an extremely serious event. By removing me and Kunstler 
from the defense team, you were really removing the only 
lawyers who weren't paid by the government. Sheikh Omar is 
representing himself but was certainly counting on a collective 
group to work with him in that self-representation. It was a 
blow struck at the heart of the defense.
There seems to be a trend now in which cases are manufactured 
out of whole cloth and people are entrapped and convicted on 
"conspiracy" charges.
One frightening aspect from a civil liberties standpoint is the 
increasing use of informers whose job it is not to simply 
monitor or even just to observe and record illegal activities, 
but who actually are out creating crime that would never have 
taken place but for their own conduct. The best example of that 
is the [current trial], where you have Mr. Emad Salem going out 
in the Muslim community and preying on Muslims who are 
particularly vulnerable. In the aftermath of the ongoing tragic 
holocaust against Muslims in Bosnia, with the world standing by 
and doing nothing, you had groups of Islamic people who said, 
"Just as we had an obligation to defend people in Afghanistan, 
we have a similar obligation to defend our brothers and sisters 
in Bosnia." A group such as this was infiltrated by Emad Salem.
Q. Why is the FBl interested in going out and creating crime?
A. The answer is simple enough. In the aftermath of the World 
Trade Center bombing, the FBI was facing ferocious criticism in 
the United States. Remember that first you had the disaster at 
Waco where these children were murdered in the course of this 
insane shootout with these other religious "fundamentalists." 
Then you had the World Trade Center bombing. All over the 
country, people were wondering "What's wrong with the FBI?".
What the FBI had to do was to go out and create a crime which 
they could prevent, a crime that would be so vast that it would 
make the World Trade Center bombing pale by comparison. So they 
sent Emad Salem out to create these crazy plots - blow up the 
United Nations and so on. At the end, the FBl said "Lights, 
camera, action!" and had a huge press conference at which they 
said, "We didn't save the World Trade Center, but we prevented 
the bombing of the UN, the Holland Tunnel, the Lincoln Tunnel 
and the George Washington Bridge and the assassinations of Al 
D'Amato and Boutros Boutros-Ghali." They posed as Superman 
saving the world and everybody was congratulating them.
The papers the next day blared "New York Dodges a Bullet" and 
proclaimed "FBl Heroism." People were tragically misled by the 
FBl into believing that the FBl had in fact prevented something 
from taking place when the only thing they did was prevent the 
fruition of the very conspiracy that it had created itself.
Q. Are you going to get a chance to come back at Emad Salem and 
expose his role to the world?
A. We're certainly going to do our best. He's going to be 
called as a witness. We'll see what happens.
Q. What are the prospects for appeal on the convictions from 
the first trial?
A. Of course, we have filed notices of appeal for all four of 
the defendants, but people have to understand that the courts 
in this country are no more immune to the kind of hysteria and 
anti-Islam sentiment that you see elsewhere in the country. 
Instead of being the guarantors of fundamental constitutional 
rights, too often we see these reactionary, and in many ways 
stupid, judges toadying to the very worst in American society 
rather than standing for the best in American society.
The tragedy in all of this is that we're making the same old 
mistake as when we've interfered in the internal affairs of 
other countries, supporting corrupt dictatorships like the Shah 
of Iran and Hosni Mubarak against popular revolutionary forces. 
We fear those popular revolutionary forces. The U.S. is 
buying hatred and enmity for itself in places like Egypt. Why? 
If the people of Egypt want to live under Islamic law, then by 
God that's their right. It is not the business of the 
United States government to meddle in these nations and 
dictate the kinds of government they should have.
Q. Ron, tell us something about your own background.
A. I came from a working-class family in the state of Ohio. 
I'm Jewish by religious background and when I was very young I 
belonged to a right-wing Zionist paramilitary organization. 
It's not widely known, but I was a member of the Jewish Defense 
League when I was a teenager. My father was a Zionist, I became 
a Zionist. I knew Rabbi Meir Kahane-he was a family friend back 
in the late 1960s and early 1970s-before he emigrated to Israel.
I suppose what cured me of that type of Zionism was actually 
emigrating to Israel. I was expecting to see this paradise of 
Jews working together, living in peace and harmony with 
their neighbors, building a country. Instead, what I saw was 
this terrible racist country in which a small elite of Zionists 
controlled a Jewish working class and terrorized the 
Palestinian population. It was like being in the United States, 
except instead of the White establishment it was the Jewish 
establishment.
I found out that the people I had more in common with, the 
people whose physical company I enjoyed more, were the 
Palestinians. I ended up having many more Palestinian friends 
than I had Zionist friends, and eventually said to hell with 
the whole thing and ended up on the road that I've ended up on.
Q. What can and should be done in terms of support for the 
Sheikh and the others who have-and are continuing to 
be-railroaded in these "Muslim Conspiracy" trials?
A. The problem is that there has not been any organized Islamic 
response to this situation, and others do not know or hear 
about it much. Every time Muslims get together and try to raise 
a protest, they end up getting indicted!
Q. Just to get it on the record once again, if there is a 
"mastermind," then who is it?
A. The "mastermind" is the government of the United States. It 
was a phony, government-engineered "conspiracy" to begin with. 
It would never have amounted to anything had the government not 
planned it.
Other articles by Husayn Al Kurdi: on the Muslim Conspiracy 
Trials: "Islamic Fundamentalism-New Whipping Boy on the Block," 
The Alternative, 11/30/93; "Muslim Speaks Out Against War on 
Islam," The Final Call, 1/19/94; "World Trade Center Bombing 
Trial Raises Troubling Questions for FBl," The Espresso, 
4/15/94; "Who Blew Up the World Trade Center?" Anderson Valley 
Advertiser, 4/20/94.
Latest Khutba: Learning from Hadith how to 
treat News
Mumbai: Understanding the Media bias: Did you ever see the 
Horrors of Kashmir on your TV screens?
U.S. Ally India is beng hurt in Mumbai, taken by surprise: 
Hence non-stop TV Coverage
November 28, 2008: Dr. Kaukab Siddique gave a juma khutba in 
Baltimore. The main points are listed here for national and 
international distribution. Please pass it on to your lists.
Text for Part I of the Khutba:
"Whenever news of any matter comes to them, whether concerning 
peace or war, they spread it about. If they referred it to the 
Messenger and those in authority among them, those seeking its 
meaning would have found it out from them. If it were not for 
Allah's bounty and mercy towards you, almost all of you would 
have followed Satan." [The Qur'an 4:83]
"The Messenger of Allah, peace be on him, said: It is enough 
for a person to be considered a liar that he narrates whatever 
he has heard without investigation." [Hadith, Sahih Muslim]
- 
We must learn from the Qur'an and the Hadith how to process the 
information we received. At this time, the situation is urgent 
because TV and the Internet are pumping news and info into 
homes across the continent.
 - 
Islam teaches us to investigate the sources of info. Muslims 
should know that major media are OWNED by big corporations 
which don't care one jot for the masses of people in America 
and globally.
 - 
The corporate media are then manipulated and controlled by 
Zionist cliques.
 - 
The major media tell lies by OMISSION.
 - 
Notice AFRICA. In countries like South Africa, Uganda and 
Kenya, nearly 25% of the population is infected with HIV 
leading to AIDS and slow death. Mass death on this scale, if 
happening in a European country, would have led to the 
declaration of national, continental and global emergency.
 - 
Instead we find that AFRICA is NOT IN THE NEWS at all. 
Bush claims that he wants to give $200 million to Africa. 
[Divide it by 20 countries: It comes to $10 million per 
country!] He spends $1 BILLION EVERY WEEK in Iraq and send 
BILLIONS every year to Israel. This ONE Jewish country gets 
more from Bush than ALL of Africa combined.
 - 
Look at the bombing of Iraq. One milion dead. Anything on TV? 
No! Look at the Afghan villages bombed by B-52s, the 
greatest act of tyranny in human history. Any coverage on the 
media? Zero
 - 
ALL of GAZA has been turned into a concentration camp by the 
Jews. Any TV coverage of Gaza? Very little and that is by 
independents, not by the corporate media.
 - 
The Red Mosque and the Women's Seminary of Jamia Hafsa 
were attacked by the Pakistani army with the full backing of 
the U.S. and Israel. Any U.S. TV coverage? Zero! [Even the 
Christian Science Monitor did not know what had happened.]
 - 
Look at Somalia. The greatest human tragedy of our times 
is underway. More than 400,000 people have een driven from 
their homes by Ethiopian occupation forces backed by the U.S. 
Starvation has set in. Any major media TV coverage? Zero!
 - 
The Zionists claimed that only ONE of Sudan's 13 
provinces, named Darfur, was undergoing genocide. The 
story was started by a Hindu sitting in the U.N. Soon it was on 
every TV screen, by White people and Zionists who do not know 
the language. The claim was made that "Arabs" were killing 
"Black Africans." It was a lie which was soon exposed but the 
media are still repeating it. [ALL Sudanese are Black Africans!]
 
Text for Part II of the khutba:
"O you who believe! if a corrupt person comes to you with any 
news, investigate it, lest you harm people unwittingly and 
afterwards become full o repentance for what you have done." 
[The Qur'an 49:6]
"Abdullah ibn Mas'ud [r.a.] narrates that Satan appears in 
human shape and in front of a crowd tells a lie. The crowd 
disperses after a while and from among it some persons start 
narrating that they heard a man, whom they say they recognize, 
name unknown, was saying so and so." [Sahih Muslim.]
- 
Now come to Mumbai, India. For three straight days [Nov. 26, 
27, 28] the corporate media have been reporting the attacks 
on Mumbai NON-STOP around the clock, as if America is 
under attack.
 - 
They do not discuss WHY the attacks have taken place. In three 
days, the word KASHMIR has not even been mentioned.
 - 
Why is this small group of fighters attacking high value Indian 
targets where these targets coincide with India's relationship 
with the U.S. and Israel?
 - 
In the background of India's image as a "democracy" is the 
horror show in Kashmir which has become permanent over more 
than three decades.
 - 
Why Mumbai? Shouldn't the media provide some context? In 
journalism, background is essential. Things don't just happen.
 - 
Obviously, the attack on Mumbai will hurt India's economy and 
its ability to generate funds for military power.
 - 
Fact number one: There are 700,000 Indian military forces 
occupying Kashmir which is a Muslim country. This is 
several times more than the 150,000 U.S. troops occupying Iraq 
and 40,000 NATO troops in Afghanistan.
 - 
Indian troops have broken into just about every Muslim home in 
Kashmir in the last three decades. More than 400,000 
Kashmiris have become refugees in Pakistan and many thousands 
more overseas.
 - 
Thousands of Kashmiris have been murdered in cold blood by the 
Indian, Hindu-dominated, military and police. Tens of thousands 
have been tortured and mutilated.
 - 
Human rights groups have documented the fact that India uses 
RAPE as a weapon to crush the Muslims of Kashmir, somewhat 
like the Serbs did in Bosnia. Owing to lack of media coverage, 
American women are not protesting these horrors.
 - 
India is humiliating the Kashmiri people by holding fake 
"elections" in Kashmir, by paying the collaborators and 
those near starvation, while it holds the masses of people 
under its military heel.
 - 
Then we have Mumbai. The coverage presents a grim picture of 
carnage. Careful study shows that the 22 people who attacked, 
first repulsed India's best police forces, killing its 
anti-terrorism chief and its Deputy inspector General 
of Police.
 - 
One reason for the extensive coverage in the USA could be that 
Israelis were targeted. These assailants are scary 
fighters: One of them held off an Indian battalion alone for a 
whole day.
 - 
We Muslims should say that all terrorism should be opposed. 
Terrorism by the strong should not be ignored while terrorism 
by the weak and poorly armed is turned into a tragic TV drama.
 - 
Muslim groups in the U.S., especially the rich elitist groups, 
rushed off to support the major media version of events even on 
the first day. I am also receiving emails from India, from the 
Muslim elites, full of similar expressions.
 - 
This defensive attitude is like the American saying: "I don't 
beat my wife." Or the Pakistani who said: "Main jooti chor 
nahin hoon" when he picked up someone else's shoes from 
the mosque.
 - 
We U.S. Muslims obey the law. We pay our taxes and we care for 
our neighbors. We must analyze the wars taking place cooly and 
without trying to justify our existence as Muslims or thinking 
that we have to condemn Muslims overseas.
 - 
Study a few verses of the Qur'an every day. Study at least one 
Hadith every day.
 - 
Apply the Hadith test: Who is the source? to all information.
 
Indian occupation forces in Srinagar, occupied Kashmir. The 
shops are all shuttered owing to a general strike by the 
Kashmiri people to oppose the fake elections India is holding. 
This photo was taken only a few days before the fighters 
attacked the Taj hotel, etc in Mumbai, India.
2008-11-30 Sun 05:07:55 cst
NewTrendMag.org