NewTrendMag.org
 
News
 # 
1171
[
Click on NEWS for back issues
][
OUR BOOKS
]
Ramadan 29, 1428. October 12, 2007.  #79
Jamaat al-Muslimeen, P.O. Box 10881, Baltimore, MD 21234 
[2 items]
Press Release
Jamaat al-Muslimeen Condemns Bombing of Civilians by 
Pakistan Air Force and U.S. Air Force
Pakistani media report that during the night of October 9-10, 
Pakistani jet fighters hit civilians who oppose the Pakistani 
regime. In the following day 60 civilians, including 17 women 
and 20 children, were buried by villagers following their 
deaths at the "hands" of the Pakistan air force in the Mir 
Ali area of North Waziristan. An entire village was wiped out 
at General Musharraf's orders.
Following the air attacks, General Kayani, the general 
appointed by Musharraf as his successor, used heavy artillery 
on the villages killing another 20 civilians.
October 11. The U.S. admitted killing scores of Iraqi women 
and children in a bombing raid by the USAF ostensibly aimed 
at al-Qaida mujahideen.
We condemn this wanton and cold-blooded slaughter of civilians 
and call on the Muslim world to join us in this condemnation.
Our analysts say that behind these high tech murders lies the 
theory that children can be killed if their relatives are seen 
as "terrorists" by the U.S. and its rented Pakistani army. We 
note that no children were killed in the 9.11 attacks in the 
business hub of the U.S. in New York and on the Pentagon.
Crescent was not Sighted Anywhere in America on 
October 11, 2007
Jamaat al-Muslimeen observers across the country say that the 
crescent was not sighted anywhere. Most significant is the 
effort by Jamaat Shoora member Br. Sulayman Solano who lives 
in Brownsville, Texas, the southernmost point in the country. 
The following is Jamaat's comment on those who shamelessly 
announced Eid for Friday.
In Maryland, the horizon was heavily overcast and crescent 
sighting was out of the question. Unfortunately individuals 
who want to control and mislead the Muslim ummah made 
irresponsible claims that Eid is on Friday. They refused to 
disclose where the crescent was sighted. This dictatorial 
attitude expressed by individuals in charge of Masjid Rahma 
and its affiliates indicates a total lack of taqwa and a 
blatant attempt to control and mislead Muslims.
Middle eastern nationalism and Saudi control is playing an 
important role in these Eid claims by Masjid Rahma etc. Some 
others think that imposition of Eid means unity! These unity 
people are honest but mistaken.
Muslims will inshallah have to learn that in Eid, as in all 
matters, the Sunnah of Muhammad, pbuh, is all that matters. 
These fake leaders will be answerable on the 
Day of Judgment..
Islamic Leader's Open Letter on the Issue of Eid and 
Crescent Observation
As-salaamu `alaykum. This is an OPEN LETTER to All.
Thank you Imam Haroun for sending me this "Discourse" by 
Dr. Zulifqar Ali Shah. In response:
I invite everyone to visit: http://www.islamicmoon.com
This is the website for Shaykh Omar Afzal's Committee for 
Crescent Observation and (inshaa'Allah) we shall be guided by 
this Committee, as we have for many years, because this is 
what he does! Year end and year out. Allah, The 
All-Knowing, instructs us to go to "those who know."
On the evening of tomorrow, Friday, October 12th, 2007 
everyone should be looking for the Hilal. If the Hilal is 
sighted by reliable witnesses, then the Eid will be on 
Saturday. If it is not sighted, then the Eid will be on 
Sunday, and we shall fast on Saturday, October 13th.
We can stay informed by routinely visiting 
http://www.IslamicMoon.com or by telephoning Dr. Afzal 
directly at 1-607-277-6706 where he has a recording, which 
provides information on Hilal Sightings and the beginning 
(1st day) of the Islamic Month of Shawwal (Eid ul-Fitr).
Please read Dr. Afzal's articles on this website and I am 
sure they will make many, many matters very clear concerning 
the importance of sighting the Hilal. For example: Can there 
be more than one First of Ramadan (or any other Islamic 
Month)? ..........YES!!!
Also: Let me remind everyone reading this message that during 
the time of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) there were great 
mathematicians, many existed throughout Africa & Asia, which 
accounts for the great edifices these peoples erected for 
thousands of years. The Jews of Arabia followed a 
"calculated" calendar!
Upon migrating to Madinah, our Great Benefactor, Muhammad, 
sallallaahu `alayhi wasallam, came into direct contact with 
the Jews, their Lunar Calendar, and their ways, on a daily 
basis. Yet, concerning the Islamic Calendar, Allah, The 
All-Knowing One, instructs us to visually sight the new 
crescent moon! Rasulallah, SAW, and his Companions, radi 
Allahu `anhum, explained, in great detail, how to do this.
To not follow Allah's and His Prophet's instructions, in this 
matter, is tantamount to believing that because we wear 
wristwatches, that those before us did not know how to tell 
time! It is an audacious statement that our knowledge is 
modern and superior to that of Allah and His Messenger, SAW! 
Na`oothu billaah.
We shall not be guided by Dr. Zulifqar Ali Shah and his 
"Astrological Calculation" conclusions.
As-salaamu `alaykum wa rahmatullah.
Amir Abdallah Yasin
[If there is any American leader following the spirit of 
Jesus, pbuh, it is Carter. Read this. He is speaking as 
the Qur'an urges Muslims to speak- Editor]
America Tortures Prisoners, Carter Says
Calls Vice President Cheney 'Disaster for Our Country'
AP
Posted: 2007-10-11 07:39:19
WASHINGTON (Oct. 11) -- The U.S. tortures prisoners in 
violation of international law, former President Jimmy Carter 
said Wednesday, adding that President Bush makes up his own 
definition of torture.
Former President Jimmy Carter told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on 
Wednesday that the U.S. tortures prisoners captured in the 
war on terror. "I don't think it. I know it," Carter said.
"Our country for the first time in my life time has abandoned 
the basic principle of human rights," Carter said on CNN. 
"We've said that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to those 
people in Abu Ghraib prison and Guantanamo, and we've said we 
can torture prisoners and deprive them of an accusation of 
a crime."
Bush, responding to an Oct. 4 report by The New York Times on 
secret Justice Department memorandums supporting the use of 
"harsh interrogation techniques," defended the techniques 
Friday by proclaiming: "This government does not 
torture people."
Carter said the interrogation methods cited by the Times, 
including "head-slapping, simulated drowning and frigid 
temperatures," constitute torture "if you use the 
international norms of torture as has always been honored 
_ certainly in the last 60 years since the Universal 
Declaration of Human Rights was promulgated.
"But you can make your own definition of human rights and say 
we don't violate them, and you can make your own definition of 
torture and say we don't violate them," Carter said.
In an interview that aired Wednesday on BBC, Carter ripped 
Vice President Dick Cheney as "a militant who avoided any 
service of his own in the military."
Carter went on to say Cheney has been "a disaster for our 
country. I think he's been overly persuasive on President 
George Bush."
Cheney spokeswoman Megan Mitchell declined to speak to 
Carter's allegations.
"We're not going to engage in this kind of rhetoric," she said.
In the CNN interview, the Democratic former president 
disparaged the field of Republican presidential candidates.
"They all seem to be outdoing each other in who wants to go 
to war first with Iran, who wants to keep Guantanamo open 
longer and expand its capacity - things of that kind," 
Carter said.
He said he also disagreed with positions taken by Democratic 
Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who have declined to 
promise to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq over the 
following four years if elected president next year.
New Book
MAPPING THE DYNAMICS OF EMPIRE AND DOMESTIC DECAY
Clarity Press, Inc. is pleased to announce Rulers and Ruled 
in the US Empire: Bankers, Zionists and Militants by 
James Petras—a brilliant and succinct guide to the systemic 
dimensions of the US Empire: the social forces which rule it, 
the politico-economic and military means whereby US domination 
is assured, and the current state and possibilities 
of resistance.
Expanding upon his highly successful book, The Power of 
Israel in the United States (now available in translation 
in Japanese, Indonesian, German, Italian and Arabic), Petras 
reviews how financial capital dominates the US economy, and 
sets the parameters for political debate on the US role in 
the world economy and its implementation.
Questions of war and peace in the Middle East, however, are 
set not by oil interests or by finance capital, but by the 
Israel-Zionist power configuration, which exerts tremendous 
leverage over Congress, the mass media and the executive 
branch. This conflict of interests within the US ruling elite 
has led to a mounting schism. In pushing the US to engage in 
the disastrous Iraq war and promoting a further potentially 
catastrophic assault against Iran, the Zionist/militarist 
sector of the ruling elite has come into conflict with the 
interests of US finance capital, which seeks to entrench 
itself worldwide through the global liberalization of trade.
Finance capital and its political representatives in the US 
government depend on the support of client regimes in other 
countries, including those considered relatively 'center 
left', to sustain the US empire. However, in pursuit of 
freedom, justice, national independence and peace, powerful 
social movements and in some circumstances armed national 
resistance forces have emerged to challenge the power of the 
financial ruling class, the Zionist power configuration and 
their collaborator client rulers.
Faced with a world in which the rule of financial, Zionist and 
collaborator elites brings us to the brink of catastrophic war 
in the Middle East and social decay at home, Americans need to 
know who is calling the shots, how they do so, and why their 
interests do not coincide with the common good—of either the 
USA or the rest of the world.
These questions have more than academic interest—the answers 
affect our everyday lives. From the crises of workers' rights, 
forced emigration and our health care system to the false 
panaceas of foreign investment and trade liberalization, from 
the plunder of domestic infrastructure in support of foreign 
wars to the infliction of genocides upon distant 
populations—this is the window we need to get a clear grip on 
the calamitous impacts of the US-dominated world system, and 
assess the possibilities of global resistance.
James Petras is a Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at 
Binghamton University, New York. He is the author of 62 books 
published in 29 languages, and over 560 articles in 
professional journals, including the American Sociological 
Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and 
Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 
articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York 
Times, the  Guardian, the Nation, 
Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, 
New Left Review, Partisan Review, Temps 
Moderne, and Le Monde Diplomatique. He writes a 
monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, Le Jornada, 
and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He 
received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the 
University of California at Berkeley.
For more information or a review copy, please contact Annette 
Gordon, Business Manager, Clarity Press, Inc., Ste. 469, 3277 
Roswell Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA. 30305, 
http://www.claritypress.com . Tel: 877-613-1495, Fax: 
877-613-7868, email: businessmanager@claritypress.com
Background Report
British Army Fired Two Million Rounds of Ammunition in 
Afghanistan but Failed to Drive Taliban out of Helmand 
Province. Terrain Taking Toll of Brits
Shock toll of British injured in Afghan war
· Half of frontline troops 'patched-up'
· Senior officers fear exodus
Mark Townsend, defence correspondent
Sunday August 19, 2007
The Observer
The human cost of the war in Afghanistan to British soldiers 
can be revealed today as figures show that almost half of 
frontline troops have required significant medical treatment 
during this summer's fighting.
In a graphic illustration of the intensity of the conflict in 
Helmand province, more than 700 battlefield soldiers have 
needed treatment since April - nearly half of the 1,500 on 
the front line. The figures, obtained from senior military 
sources, have never been released by the government, which 
has faced criticism that it has covered up the true extent of 
injuries sustained during the conflict.
The Ministry of Defence releases the number of soldiers taken 
to hospital, a fraction of those who require treatment on the 
battlefield. The new figures relate to the number of soldiers 
patched up and sent back to the front line and who do not 
appear in official casualty reports.
By contrast, US official figures take into account soldiers 
treated on the front line. In their figures, wounded troops 
include those away from the front line for 72 hours or more.
One British army official said the 700 cases include a 
'handful' of officers who suffered injuries and chose to 
carry on fighting. The injuries include shrapnel wounds, 
cuts, burns, acute heat stroke and diseases such as 'DnV' - 
diarrhoea and vomiting that can incapacitate a man for days. 
Of the 700 cases, 400 combat troops were described as being 
so ill they were forced to 'lay down their bayonets'.
The number of soldiers requiring front-line treatment was 
discussed at military briefings in Helmand during intensive 
fighting this month and relate to the current deployment, 
which began in April. An army spokesman said official casualty 
figures between April and the start of August stood at 204, 
with about half stemming from the battlefield.
Military sources said the willingness of soldiers to carry on 
fighting while suffering was indicative of the bravery being 
routinely displayed.
'The courage of the soldiers has been remarkable. Many are 
getting patched up and just want to get on with it. Most do 
not want to leave their comrades,' said the source in Helmand. 
Last week, details were released about how 26-year-old Captain 
David Hicks, of the 1st Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment, 
refused morphine after being mortally wounded by shrapnel so 
he could keep a clear head to lead his men. He later died of 
his injuries.
The MoD said the figures should not be confused with its 
published 'casualty' figures, claiming that cases treated by 
frontline medics often related to minor ailments and 
complaints that were not considered life-threatening or 
serious. The spokeswoman went on to say that, in serious 
cases, troops were not given the option to carry on fighting.
However, the number of serious injuries is rising. A spokesman 
for the British Limbless Ex-Service Men's Association said 
that 27 British soldiers had lost limbs serving in Afghanistan 
and Iraq during the past 12 months.
The frenetic nature of the conflict in southern Afghanistan is 
underlined by the fact that many young infantrymen intend to 
leave the army because the firefights they have survived in 
Helmand could never be surpassed. In terms of soldiering, the 
conflict has offered some of the most intense fighting for 50 
years, with two million rounds of ammunition so far fired by 
British forces.
'You could be in the army for decades and you will never get 
anything like that again. Will it be bettered? I can't see 
it,' said one soldier. Commanders are understood to be 
concerned that the Helmand conflict could precipitate an 
exodus of combat troops who feel military life will never 
offer the same challenge again.
Campaigners have frequently argued that British troops are 
paying a higher price on the battlefield than has been made 
public. Casualty figures are expected to rise in the coming 
months as the current tour, from April to October, finishes, 
when regiments that have experienced the brunt of fighting 
push on to gain ground before they leave.
2007-10-13 Sat 03:50:11 cdt
NewTrendMag.org