NewTrendMag.org
 
News
 # 
1149
[
Click on NEWS for back issues
][
OUR BOOKS
]
Rajab 7, 1428/ July 22, 2007  #57
July 22: New Trend congratulates the Muslims of Turkey for 
their overwhelming election victory over the secularists.
The King David Hotel Bombing-Min al-Erhabi ? 
(Who's the Terrorist)
By Nadrat Siddique
July 22 marks the anniversary of the 1946 bombing of the King 
David Hotel in Palestine by the Zionist Irgun organization. 
Palestine was then a British mandate, and the headquarters of 
the British Secretariat were located in the hotel. Ninety-one 
people were killed in the bombing. Forty-five more were wounded.
Irgun's leadership claimed responsibility. Chaim Weizman, then 
President of the World Zionist Organization and soon to be first 
president of Israel, cried when he learnt of the bombing, saying 
he couldn't help but be very proud for "our boys." (Crossman, 
A Nation Reborn, The Israel of Weizmann, Bevin and 
Ben-Gurion)
The lead terrorist was an Israeli named Menachem Begin. Begin 
was commander of the Irgun at the time of the attack. Irgun's 
stated philosophy was that "political violence and terrorism" 
were "legitimate tools in the Jewish national struggle for the 
Land of Israel." (Perliger and Weinberg, Jewish Self Defense 
and Terrorist Groups Prior to the Establishment of the State of 
Israel: Roots and Traditions, Vol. 4, No. 3)
Indeed Irgun's actions were congruous with its philosophy. 
According to author James Gelvin, "Irgun perpetrated some of 
the most appalling terrorist atrocities committed in modern 
Palestine," including a campaign of bombings in Arab markets 
in 1937. From 1936 – 1939, Irgun carried out at least 60 attacks 
against Palestinian Arabs. In 1948 the organization carried out 
the Deir Yassin massacre, in which more than 250 Palestinian 
villagers were slaughtered (The Israel-Palestine Conflict, 
Cambridge University Press).
Begin went on to become Israeli Prime Minister in 1977, 
overseeing the bombing of Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 (while 
keeping Israel's nuclear weapons, developed around 1967, a 
well-guarded secret), and the invasion of Lebanon and 
Sabra-Shatilla Massacre in 1982. He won the Nobel Peace Prize 
in 1978.
My American friends tell me that Israel is a bastion of 
democracy-indeed the only democracy-in the Middle East," and 
that Palestinians are terrorists. I laugh. And laugh. 
And laugh.
Our America
"Islamophobia?" You Got to be Kidding! 
Why is Islam Spreading in America?
Why is Islam not Spreading Fast Enough? Here is Why.
by Kaukab Siddique
VISUALS and FACTS which none can deny:
Muslim women in headcovers at airport security? Surprise
Muslim woman in full hijab and niqab going 
through airport security!
Muslim men with big Arab dresses seen as celebrities by the man 
in the street.
A steady stream of people entering the family of Islam. Entire 
areas in Philadelphia have rejected the U.S. way of life and 
accepted Islam.
Not one fatality after almost six years of daily Zionist 
propaganda on the media against Islam and Muslims.
Vast conspiracy theories on TV against Muslims leading to ZERO 
public response.
Vandalism of mosques in America is less than 1% of our more than 
1,000 mosques.
Vandalism usually occurs where filthy rich Muslims build 
multi-million dollar mosques in areas where they have done 
no da'wah.
There is more vandalism of churches than of mosques. It's a 
phenomenon of alienation which is widespread in America
The Zionist propaganda blitz against Islam is the biggest 
failure of International Jewry in our times and signals the 
coming backlash against Israel and the Jewish hand behind the 
war on Iraq and the occupation of Palestine.
There is no such thing as "Islamophobia" in America. A few nuts, 
crazies and red necks can sometimes indulge in acts of hate. By 
no stretch of the imagination can these acts be seen as a 
nationwide wave of Islamophobia. This terminology comes from 
upper class "meet-me-in-the Hilton/Sheraton" type of 
pro-government groups such as CAIR, MPAC, MAS, etc. These people 
live in a world of their own cut off from America's 7 to 9 
million Muslims and from American masses in general. They react 
to the stupidities of Steve Emerson, Gaffney, etc., as if these 
low-lifes can stop the flow of Islam. Ibn Warraq, Spencer, Asra 
Nomani, Irshad Manji can stop Islam? How many Americans know 
about these haters?
USA is a nation of 300 million plus people, including 12 million 
"illegals." Why would they be against Islam? Islam is the 
greatest spiritual power in the world today. The Qur'an is the 
greatest book of our times; the example of the Prophet, pbuh, 
affects the lives of 1.8 billion people around the world 24 
hours a day. [What do the Zionists have to offer which could 
counter the Qur'an and the Hadith? NOTHING.]
Bootlicker groups like CAIR, MPAC, MAS do not realize that USA 
is a failed state. The American people are sick and tired of 
the fraud, lies and exploitation which target them on a 
daily basis. Notice how difficult it is for U.S. politicians to 
get people to vote for them? Most people don't vote. They know 
that the system does not belong to the people. The American 
vote is the most expensive in the world. Candidates don't get 
any votes if they don't spend millions of dollars.
CAIR etc do serious harm to the cause of Islam. When an 
incident takes place, CAIR publicizes it on a national level as 
if it is a widespread problem. In just about all cases, the 
governmental authorities rush to help CAIR etc solve the 
problem. Thus CAIR etc give American Muslims the impression 
that the Bush administration is the friend of the Muslims. 
This can be described as REVERSE DA'WAH. CAIR etc are spreading 
the tentacles of the Bush admin into the Muslim communities.
WHAT is the REALITY of America? Muslims are being victimized by 
the Bush administration not by the American people. Here CAIR, 
MPAC, MAS keep strictly silent about the most high profile 
cases. A shameful silence from these bootlickers, lick 
spittles, continues about:
Imam Jamil al-Amin
Shaikh Omar 'Abdel Rahman
Dr. Ali al-Timimi
Ahmed 'Abdel Sattar
Masaud Khan
Jose Padilla
Dr. Kifah al-Jayyousi
Siddique Abdullah Hasan etc., etc.
As far as these bootlickers are concerned, the government 
assault on Imam Warith Deen Umar and his family never happened. 
These lick spittles give the impression that the Haitians 
arrested near Miami were probably terrorists, and the story 
about Trinidadian-Guyanese Muslims in the JFK airport 
was probably true! CAIR etc are covert racists and jump to 
condemn Muslims specially those who are of African origin.
These groups are the new Qadianis, in love with power and 
position. Don't forget that CAIR supported the regime's stories 
about both Imam Jamil and Shaikh Omar.
WHY IS ISLAM NOT SPREADING FAST ENOUGH?
Many [perhaps most] immigrant Muslims do not understand America. 
I would suggest that every immigrant Muslim should read the 
AUTOBIOGRAPHY of MALCOLM X to understand the reality. If that 
is too much reading, at least read our little booklet 
MALCOLM X: Martyr of Islam in America by Ali Siddiqui. 
Can't read at all? Listen to Imam Jamil al-Amin's CD on the 
LEGACY of MALCOLM X [on carrying his mission forward].
Imam Jamil al-Amin points out that to be Muslim, one must follow 
the truth from Allah, not one's race or family. Uni-race groups 
so common in the past are outdated. To be Black or Arab or 
Pakistani is quite unimportant in Islam. To stand against the 
oppressors is essential. A Muslim who is silent about oppression 
is a Muslim only in name. White Muslims have to shed the idea 
that "America is the greatest." Allah Alone is the greatest.
Most immigrants do not marry across lines of class and 
race/ethnicity. This is a major failure. Muhammad, pbuh, has 
shown us through his marriages, that marriage is a central 
process for the spread of Islam. Pakistanis-Indians-Bangladeshis 
and Arabs marrying African-Americans/Africans and 
Latinos/Latinas would be a major plus for Islam.
Some immigrants who are marginal Muslims sell liquor and ham in 
the inner cities. Muslim imams should devise ways to change this 
situation which is a source of negative publicity for Muslims. 
Liquor and drugs have no place in Islam: their sale, trade and 
consumption must not be associated with Muslims.
African-American Muslims in some cities follow leadership cults 
and support the U.S. government. Although most Muslims of 
African descent do not behave like this, but the activities of 
the cult leader groups are damaging the impact of Malcolm X 
[al-Hajj Malik Shabazz].
Dr. Siddique on Radio
Musharraf's "rent-an-army" Facing Pakistani Masses: 
War Spreading after Rape of Jamia Hafsa and Red Mosque: 
New York Times focuses on Middle Class, 
Ignores Islamic Resistance
[On July 21,2007 Dr. Kaukab Siddique was interviewed, live, on 
XM radio's "On with Leon" Show by Dr. Wilmer Leon. A professor 
from Howard University, Dr. Leon is an outstanding, and rare, 
independent broadcaster who has interviewed America's leading 
dissidents, including Cindy Sheehan and Rep. Conyers as well as 
breakaway voices from the establishment, such as Michael Scheuer, 
author of Imperial Hubris.]
[Dr. Leon questioned Siddique about recent coverage in the 
New York Times about the Red Mosque and the case of 
Pakistan's Chief Justice.]
[XM radio reaches people across the country.]
[Summary of main points in the interview follows.]
Opposition to General Musharraf is moving on two tracks. The one 
which interests the New York Times is the recent upheaval 
caused by the suspension and the reinstatement of the Chief 
Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The middle/upper class 
of Pakistan, about 5 to 10% of the population, now sees 
Musharraf as a problem. The U.S. is working to bring in its B 
team, Benazir Bhutto's Peoples Party, through the middle class' 
agitation because Musharraf is extremely unpopular. The Chief 
Justice's lead attorney is an insider of the Bhutto group.
The real conflict in Pakistan is between the army and the poor, 
downtrodden, masses, represented by the Red Mosque and the
 women's university, Jamia Hafsa. The values of Islam, as shown 
by Abdul Rashid Ghazi, martyr of the Red Mosque, and the values 
of the Pakistani army are diametrically opposed to each other.
If America's hegemony, values, consumer culture are to be 
imposed on Pakistan at the mass level, the religion of the 
masses, Islam, is the impediment.
America has "rented" the Pakistani army to destroy Pakistan's 
values and integrity. The leaders of the Islamic women's 
university and the Red Mosque opposed the army [and the Bush 
doctrine]. I interviewed both the woman leader Umm Hasan, of 
Jamia Hafsa, and Abdul Rashid Ghazi and found out the root of 
the conflict. They wanted to end government corruption, western 
interference and sexual exploitation of women. They wanted 
Islamic Law.
The government falsely claimed that "terrorists" were hiding in 
the mosque but the Mosque leadership invited media, religious 
leaders and politicians to visit and see for themselves.
Pakistani military forces have suffered more than 200 dead in 
martyrdom operations after the desecration of the mosque and 
women's university. Musharraf, backed by the U.S., is faced by 
strong Islamic resistance. The U.S. has threatened to send 
its forces into Pakistan to help Musharraf's "rented army" if 
the Pakistanis are too weak to fight the forces of Islam.
Bush's designs on Pakistan and his strong support for Musharraf, 
plus the build up of Benazir Bhutto, indicates that war is 
coming, big time, to Pakistan.
The slaughter of young Islamic women in Jamia Hafsa by 
Musharraf's commandos is being censored by the U.S. media. Many 
of these young women were from the Frontier areas of Pakistan 
which are the areas of resistance to the U.S.
The sudden "victory" of the Chief Justice in Pakistan looks 
like a victory for rule of Law but in fact might be a ploy to 
help Musharraf focus on the war against the Islamic resistance 
which is Bush's main interest in Pakistan
During the interview, Dr. Siddique brought to the fore the vigil 
to be held on August 19 in memory of 14 year old Abeer al-Janabi 
who was gang raped, killed and burned by U.S. troops in Iraq. 
Her sister and parents were also killed. The vigil will remember 
her as a symbol of all the victims of the Iraq war including 
Americans. For more information contact:
http://abeermemorial.blogspot.com
or email: 
abeermemorial@yahoo.com
Jamaat al-Muslimeen [News] [This item only.]
P.O. Box 10881
Baltimore, MD 21234
U.S. Muslims face Oppression: 
Padilla, Hassoun and al-Jayyousi: 
Thought Crimes and 14,000 phone messages
Miami, Florida: In its July 19 issue, the Christian Science 
Monitor published a perceptive report on the trial of Jose 
Padilla and co-defendants Adham Hassoun and Dr. 
Kifah al-Jayyousi. We thank CSM for this rare positive 
reporting on the suffering of U.S. Muslims.
The government is out to destroy these three Muslims and to give 
them maximum sentences. Jose Padilla has absolutely no 
connection to al-Jayyousi but he spoke to Hassoun and Hassoun 
spoke to al-Jayyousi. The government has turned this connection 
into an "al-Qaida cell." There was no organization, no targets, 
no victims yet the government is out to punish the three for 
their thoughts. As the defense put it, the minds of the 
three are on trial and they are being accused of POTENTIAL 
murder, kidnapping and maiming! The CSM summed it up 
beautifully thus:
"But after an eight-week presentation of evidence by the 
government, prosecutors have not identified a single individual 
as a potential target for murder, kidnapping, or maiming, nor 
have they identified any specific plot to accomplish someone's 
murder, kidnapping, or maiming."
The CSM coverage of the trial shows that over FOURTEEEN YEARS, 
the government intercepted 300,000 phone conversations between 
Hassoun and Kifah al-Jayyousi. Of these the government has 
selected 14,000 and of these 123 have been chosen to accuse the 
defendants of potential terrorism. How many Muslims will not 
make 123 irresponsible statements over a period of 14 years? 
That was the time when Muslims were supporting Chechnya, Bosnia 
and Kosovo and helping the needy in Lebanon and Somalia. They 
could not have dreamt that they will be accused of terrorism 
for their charitable activities.
A much less sympathetic Washington Post [June 27] 
reported, when the trial began on June 26, 2007, that the 
prosecution showed clips from an interview by Peter Arnett with 
Osama bin Laden which appeared on CNN. According to an 
"illegally" wiretapped conversation, when Hassoun told 
al-Jayyousi about the interview, he said, "Allahu Akbar! Please 
tape it." And Hassoun said: "May Allah protect him." In the 
interview, Osama described the U.S. government as "unjust, 
criminal and tyrannical," complained of U.S.' pro-Israel 
policies and denied having financed the 1993 World Trade 
Center bombing.
The brief conversation of the two defendants about the Osama 
interview is being presented by the government as proof that 
they were "potential terrorists."
Jose Padilla has been in prison for 5 years already while Kifah 
al-Jayyousi is out on bail [which destroyed his economic 
viability] and is restricted to the Miami area though his home 
is in the far north in Detroit, Michigan.
LETTER from a Reader in Texas against Shia-Sunni conflict
We are killing each other by the hundreds every day. 
Where is the outrage?
By Afzal Khorasani 7/15/07
When I see finger pointing and mud slinging taking place between 
the Shias and Sunnis I see that they are very much alike. They 
always result in hurt feelings. In some instances this lasts for 
a lifetime. Those dishing out provocative and disrespectful 
statements are angry. Those at the receiving end become angrier, 
and cannot wait for a chance to retaliate, which results in the 
most egregious hate crimes. Then, finger pointing takes the 
stage as to who started it all. Such exercises are 
counter-productive, resulting in nothing more than greater 
division and more intense hate between the sects. Now, if you 
are a mischief-maker, this is exactly what you are trying to 
achieve. On the other hand, if you want Islam to be a united 
Ummah you should rise above the pettiness and take the high 
road to unity and tolerance. What good are the billion plus 
Muslims when they are all fragmented and at each other's 
throats all the time?
Today we are being killed and destroyed from forces within more 
than from outside forces. It takes courage to say that I am not 
going to fuel this sectarian fire anymore. If it comes my way 
again I will consciously and deliberately diffuse it and 
discourage it. There is just no other solution for something 
like this other than divine intervention.
To help make this message of unity and tolerance more palatable 
we must unhesitatingly condemn Shia-Sunni rhetoric. The actions 
of a few thousand radicals cannot be allowed to dictate the 
future of peace-loving Muslims of every sect. There is real 
reason to be concerned about the potential for an all out Shia 
Sunni backlash. We should not give in to hearsay and sectarian 
biases. Sectarian hatred is as wrong today as it was 1400 
years ago.
Editorial response: New Trend only deals with the actions 
of people, not with their beliefs and dogmas. Note our coverage 
of Israel's attack on Hizbullah, see our reporting on 
Ahmedinejad and Iran's release of British sailors as well as 
our rebuttal of Glenn Beck's attacks on Iran. It might make you 
think that we support Shias.
However, in Iraq, the Shias of various persuasions supported 
the American invasion and occupation. Now these Iraqi Shias are 
helping the U.S. to crush the Islamic resistance. The behavior 
of Ali Sistani, Ja'afari, Al-Maliki, Allawi, and al-Hakim can 
certainly not be considered Islamic. Moqtada al-Sadr is more 
independent but he too is helping to kill Sunnis and thus 
clearing the way for the U.S. Reports indicate that the 
resistance is not targeting Shias because they are Shias, but 
because they support the occupation. Now the resistance is 
targeting some Sunnis of Anbar province who decided to 
collaborate with the U.S. for large sums of money. It's not a 
Shia-Sunni conflict but an occupier versus resistance struggle.
Health Notes: Thanks to an alert New Trend reader
Study: Chocolate reduces blood pressure
CHICAGO - Here's some good and bad news for chocoholics: 
Dark chocolate seems to lower blood pressure, but it requires 
an amount less than two Hershey's Kisses to do it, a small 
study suggests. The new research from Germany adds to mounting 
evidence linking dark chocolate with health benefits, but it's 
the first to suggest that just a tiny amount may suffice.
Volunteers for the study ate just over 6 grams of dark chocolate 
daily for almost five months. One square from a German chocolate 
bar called Ritter Sport, equal to about 1 1/2 Hershey's Kisses. 
People who ate that amount ended up with lower blood pressure 
readings than those who ate white chocolate.
University of Cologne researcher Dr. Dirk Taubert, the study's 
lead author, said the blood pressure reductions with dark 
chocolate were small but still substantial enough to potentially 
reduce cardiovascular disease risks, although study volunteers 
weren't followed long enough to measure that effect.
The research involved just 44 people aged 56 through 73, but the 
results echo other small studies of cocoa-containing foods. 
Cocoa contains flavanols, plant-based compounds that also are 
credited with giving red wine its heart-healthy benefits.
One problem is chocolate bars containing cocoa tend to have lots 
of calories, so Taubert and his colleagues tested small amounts 
containing just 30 calories each.
The study appears in Journal of the American Medical Association. 
It was funded by University Hospital in Cologne.
The results are interesting but need to be duplicated in larger, 
more ethnically diverse populations, said Dr. Laura Svetkey, 
director of Duke University's Hypertension Center.
She stressed that the study results should not be viewed as 
license to gorge on chocolate.
"I would be as happy as the next person if I got to eat more 
chocolate," she said, but cautioned that weight gain from eating 
large amounts of dark chocolate would counteract any benefits on 
blood pressure.
Study participants were otherwise healthy and mostly 
normal-weight German adults with mild high blood pressure or 
pre-hypertension, which includes readings between 120 over 80 
and 139 over 89.
Average blood pressure at the start was about 147 over 86.
Every day for 18 weeks, the volunteers were instructed to eat 
one-square portions of a 16-square Ritter Sport bar, or a 
similar portion of white chocolate. White chocolate doesn't 
contain cocoa.
Systolic blood pressure, the top number, fell an average of 
nearly three points and diastolic dropped almost two points in 
the dark chocolate group, compared with no change in blood 
pressure readings in the white chocolate group.
Tests suggested that steady exposure to dark chocolate prompted 
chemical changes that helped dilate blood vessels and regulate 
blood pressure, the researchers said.
Participants were told not to eat other cocoa-containing 
products and to continue regular eating habits and activity 
levels. They also kept food diaries so researchers could see if 
other foods might have influenced the results.
But, said Taubert, "It is very unlikely that other factors may 
explain the blood pressure reduction."
Dr. Lawrence Appel of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine said the 
most proven non-drug methods for lowering blood pressure are 
losing weight and eating less salt. Eating dark chocolate might 
help if combined with those two, he said.
For most people, "the lower your blood pressure, the better you 
are. So if you can get it lower from different strategies that's 
good for the long term," Appel said.
Letter
From Islamic Da'wah Teacher in New York: On Red Mosque, 
Jamia Hafsa tragedy
The most condemnable drama staged by "Ghulam-Pervez" in the 
compound of Lal Masjid and Hafsa University in Islamabad is 
"over," showering the benediction of Shahadah to Abdul Rashid 
Ghazi, his respected mother and scores of other devoted Muslims 
and Muslimah but it is not "finished."
The blood of a "shaheed" is never wasted. It was an individual 
feat of courageous stand that was taken by the two brothers 
against the tyrant, oppressive and un-Islamic regime of the 
usurper "Ghulam-Pervez" [GP] to please his masters abroad.
The tragedy of Karbala, where a single individual with his 
family members stood up and faced all odds against the 
"imposed" tyrant regime of the time, has been gloriously 
repeated in Islamabad. Its repercussions in the country and 
outside will be great and insurmountable for generations to 
come to "complete" the outcome. The region is bound to produce 
innumerable martyrs like Ghazi Rashid to lay down their life 
for the cause, the resurrection of Islam, the most dear 
objective of Shaheed Rashid, his family members and 
devoted followers.
Through this wild and well calculated action, the war at the 
Pak-Afghanistan borders has entered deep into every Muslim house 
of Pakistan. President Bush will increase his grip over 
Pakistan, interfere in its educational and internal affairs and 
the "GP" will get ever-increasing dictations from White House 
and Pentagon with which to comply. On the other hand, if it 
renews the Muslim urge towards transforming Pakistan into a 
true Islamic state, it would be the best blessing for Muslim 
ummah out of this bloody carnage at Islamabad.
Both Bush and "GP" planned but Allah is the best Planner. 
Tremendous "Khair" for Ummah is bound to come out of this 
colossal tragedy of human loss.
Shamim Siddiqi
WWW.dawahinamericas.com
WAR NEWS: From the Urdu language media
Pakistan: War in the Northwest: 
Martyrdom Operators Take Revenge for Jamia Hafsa
[See earlier reports in issue before last.]
North Waziristan: July 21, 2007. At least five Pakistanis, 
including a trooper, were killed when a martyrdom operator hit a 
military post on the Pak-Afghan frontier.
July 20: Pakistani Taliban gave an ultimatum to Pakistani 
paramilitary forces [khasadars] to vacate their posts in the 
North Waziristan-Bannu sector. By the evening, Khasadars 
had fled five posts. Three other posts on the Bannu-Miranshah 
road were blown up by the local Taliban without casualties.
July 22 Pakistani military is reporting gun battles in the 
north Waziristan [Afghan border] area where it is claiming 
that it killed 7 Islamic fighters. [It claims the bodies were 
taken away by the fighters.] Pakistani helicopters attacked 
mujahideen in three areas and claimed to have killed 13. The 
claim could not be verified. Mujahideen attacks resumed [as of 
this writing.] Eight Pak troops were wounded
July 18: Near Miranshah, a martyrdom operator killed 4 
Pakistani troops and wounded 6. In the city, 4 CD stores which 
were used, under police protection, to sell pornography, were 
blown up at night.
July 17: Local Islamic resistance fighters blew up two Pak army 
posts in the Mir Ali area near Miranshah killing 5 
Pakistani troops.
South Waziristan: Delayed reports say that local Islamic 
leader Baitullah Mehsud called a general gathering [jirga] 
of all segments of the population in which he urged Jihad 
against the Pakistani army for the occupation of the Red 
mosque/Jamia Hafsa. The people unanimously agreed.
Swat: July 20: A local Islamic leader, Maulana Fazlullah, 
addressed 20,000 people. He said that there will be no peace in 
the area until the Pakistani army is withdrawn. He has his own 
FM radio which he used to call on the people to rise up in 
Jihad after the Red Mosque tragedy.
July 17: Panicky Pakistani troops opened fire on a civilian car 
killing its unarmed driver. Troops also fired on a mentally 
disturbed person wandering down the street killing him on 
the spot.
Darra Adam Khel: July 15: Islamic crowds blocked the 
Indus Highway. In town, during the night of July 15-16, local 
Taliban burned down 30 shops selling opium and other drugs. The 
Musharraf regime, like Karzai in Kabul, protects the drug trade 
which the Taliban want to wipe out.
Hangu, Frontier Province: July 18: A martyrdom operator 
killed 8 people including an army trooper.
Sind Province, Hub, west northwest of Karachi: July 18: 
A martyrdom operator attacked massed police forces with a large 
explosive charge. At least 30 policemen and related personnel 
were killed in the explosion and 30 others, including civilians, 
wounded. Fifteen cars caught fire and blew up; 25 shops were 
destroyed. Police panicked and opened fire in all directions 
killing one person.
Islamabad [not far from the Red Mosque tragedy]: July 17: 
A bomb attack aimed at police guarding the venue of a speech by 
the chief justice killed 12 activists of Bhutto's Peoples Party 
including its local leader. Another 40 people, including 12 
policemen, were wounded. Chaotic scenes followed.
Propaganda war: The Musharraf regime spread the word that 
Indian intelligence service known as RAW was carrying out the 
attacks on troops. Some of the Muslim groups accepted and 
repeated this claim. Others were puzzled how can Indians [Hindus 
known for their cowardice] be carrying out "suicide attacks" in 
the interior of Pakistan against its armed forces. Besides, they 
noted, Musharraf has excellent relations with India. Shouldn't 
he send his troops to fight India if the propaganda is true?
On July 18, a top leader of the Islamic resistance in the 
mountains, in a live interview with BBC, took the wind out of 
the RAW story. Maulana Faqir Muhammad said that the 
attacks, in retaliation for Lal Masjid, being carried out all 
over the country against military and police were organized by 
the Islamic resistance. He said that propaganda cannot disunite 
and fool the resistance which, he said, is fully united with and 
connected to Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar.
BEARDS: Musharraf's propaganda machine tried to confuse 
Muslims during the attack on Jamia Hafsa. His troops leading the 
attack had BEARDS. Devout Muslims usually have beards. Musharraf 
wanted to create the impression that both sides are 
Muslims. However, observers noticed that the beards of the 
Pakistani troops were very short and seemed to have been grown 
during the siege of the Islamic women's university. Pakistani 
troops attacking a mosque and Islamic women's university are no 
longer considered Muslims by observers who take Islam seriously.
Jamaat-e-Islami does not want mujahideen to fight 
Musharraf's troops: Waiting for Democracy.
Pakistan's most peaceful Muslim group, Jamaat-e-Islami, while 
strongly critical of the attack on the Red Mosque, is condemning 
the mujahideen's attacks on the army and police. In Swat, 
the JI went to the extent of condemning martyrdom operations as 
HARAM [forbidden] in Islam. It is trying to stop local 
Jihad leader Maulana Fazlullah from using radio to call 
for Jihad.
JI is of the view that with the re-instatement of the Chief 
Justice, democracy will return to Pakistan. [New Trend's 
observers say that JI's activities are like those of Ikhwan 
al-Muslimeen in Egypt. When Sadat was killed by Khalid 
al-Islambouli [r.a.], the Ikhwan condemned the killing. When 
Gama al-Islamiyya [whose spiritual leader was Shaikh Omar 'Abde 
Rahman] resisted Hosni Mubarak, the Ikhwan opposed the Gamaa. 
As a result, Mubarak is still in power. JI, our observers say, 
is hopelessly misled in its belief in democracy: USA is 
preparing to go militarily into Pakistan to help the 
Pakistani army fight the Islamic forces. The Pakistani people 
need leadership to fight against a Musharraf-Busharraf invasion. 
Instead JI wants democracy. JI seems to have lost contact with 
reality.
2007-07-23 Mon 19:12:33 cdt
NewTrendMag.org