NewTrendMag.org
 
News
 # 
1052
[
Arabic
][
Deutsch
][
Español
][
Français
][
Italiano
]
Jamada al-Thani 22,1427/July 18, 2006  #46
Amazing story of a Pakistani organization which openly 
defies U.S. ban: 
Scroll way down.
300,000 Lebanese have been forced by Israeli bombing to take 
refuge in Syria. In Gaza, Israeli tank columns have turned the 
area into a vast concentration camp, with dwindling water supply 
and no electricity. See our analysis below and note on demo in 
Greensboro, North Carolina.
The rape of an Iraqi teenager by U.S. troops has 
revealed the outer margin of the miasmic horror of U.S. 
war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. For such circumstances, 
Islamic authorities implement the "burqa" or "burka." See an 
insightful article by Ms. Nadrat Siddique, 
below.
New Trend has posted the photos of Lebanese children slaughtered 
by the Jewish-Israeli terror groups on our web site. Please go to:
http://newtrendmag.org/pictures10.htm
RE: A question posted on Bangla-Vision about 
Dr. Kaukab Siddique's interview about Lebanon, 
NY Times on Taliban and India's missile:
"Make It Plain" is an XM Satellite program that airs daily and 
is broadcast nationally. Dr. Wilmer Leon substituted for the 
regular host, Mark Thompson, on July 12, 13, and 14. Dr. 
Siddique's interview will be posted on Dr. Leon's web site 
by Tuesday for downloading. There will also be a CD of the interview. 
Along with Dr. Siddique's interview will be interviews with 
Dilip Hiro (Middle East), Phyllis Bennis (Middle East), 
Dr. Ron Walters (Voting Rights Act), and Rev. Dr. Joseph Lowery 
(Voting Rights Act).
www.WilmerLeon.com
ANALYSIS
Hizbullah Emerged Victorious in First Six Days of War, 
but it was a Tactical Victory...
What are Israel's Strategic Objectives in the Destruction of Lebanon?
New Trend Special Report for July 12-17, 2006
Segment One: U.S. Media Mislead Americans about the War. Here's How:
1. The corporate media went all out to support Israel's assault on Lebanon.
2. NOT ONE islamic commentator was allowed to speak on CNN, MSNBC, 
FOX, ABC, CBS, NBC or any other major TV or radio outlets.
3. Israeli and Zionist commentators hogged the air waves, with 
loyal opposition provided by secularized and/or non-Muslim Arabs.
4. The media pretended that Israel and Hizbullah have military 
parity, with Israel attacking Lebanon and Hizbullah attacking "Israel."
5. The media parrotted the viewpoint of the Bush administration 
that in attacking Lebanon, Israel was "defending itself" and that 
"Israel has the right to defend itself." Israeli "ambassadors" from 
near and far wwre called in to explain that the attack was really 
defense. [Exception to the rule was Buchanan, on MSNBC, who blasted 
the Israeli aggression.]
6. The Bush administration and the corporate media now claim 
that attacks on ISRAELI TROOPS are ACTS OF TERRORISM. In simple 
language, it means: Any Muslim who fights back is a "terrorist." 
If "we" attack Muslims, we are "defending ourselves" and we have 
the "right to defend ourselves."
7. The media failed to show the suffering of Shia Muslims being 
bombed by Israel in south Beirut and Shia Muslims being hit by 
Israeli tank and artillery fire in southern Lebanon. NOT ONE 
INTERVIEW WITH SHIA MUSLIM FAMILIES in six days.
SEGMENT TWO: Facts on the ground indicate Israel's TACTICAL DEFEAT:
1. As Israel tried to enter Lebanon, the tank leading its column 
was blown up by Hizbullah. The Israelis were so scared, they did 
not try to advance again for six days. [Remember the era of 
SECULARISM when Israel defeated the combined Arab armies in six 
days? Islam's resurgence has changed the situation.]
2. Israel tried to bring down Lebanon through a bombing campaign 
in the hope that the Lebanese, many of whom are Christians and 
Druze, would turn on Hizbullah as the cause of their misery. 
The Lebanese were so hurt and humiliated by Israel's arrogant 
attempt to destroy their economy, that their leader, a secularist 
and friend of America, spoke with great anguish to his people and 
called for unity against Israel.
3. In spite of Israel's ability to attack Lebanon at will, there 
were moments when the Lebanese, and the Muslim world, could stop 
and cheer. On one such occasion, Hizbullah hit an Israeli gunboat 
which was comfortably blasting away at a Lebanese port from a safe 
20 miles away. Another great occasion was when Hizbullah hit 
railway yards in Haifa [how dare you!] and killed 8 Israelis.
4. Not only has Hizbullah not collapsed after 6 days of bombardment, 
it has come out strong and united. Shaikh Nasrallah, his family home 
destroyed in a dastardly Jewish terror attack, came out with faith 
and power on Al-Manar TV to defy Israel.
5. Israel began, July 13, with the claim that it will "destroy" 
and "break" Hizbullah. By July 17, that bullying tone was turning 
into a whiny voice giving out terms for cease fire.
SEGMENT THREE: First the veto and then Bush and Blair frustrated
The U.S. used its veto to stop a ceasefire resolution proposed by 
the Security Council of the United Nations. The U.S. had evidently 
been advised by its Israeli ally that it was going to carry out a 
whirlwind bombing campaign which would bring Hizbullah down.
Now that the bombing campaign has failed to defeat Hizbullah and 
has killed 300 Lebanese civilians and wounded 700 [according to 
very conservative estimates], Bush and Blair are working for a 
cease fire.
Behind Bush, a line-up of American politicians is trying to convince 
Americans that Israel is the victim (!) and that Israeli soldiers 
should not have been "abducted." [How an armed man in a tank can be 
"abducted" is beyong human understanding. Soldiers are CAPTURED in 
war and can be exchanged for the other side's captives.]
Gingrich [Republican "pope"] claimed that this is WORLD WAR III! 
Biden [Democrat] was only a little less foolish. McCain [whom some 
see as the future Republican leader] spoke at length almost as a 
puppet of Israel.
SEGMENT FOUR: IRAN MISSED an IMPORTANT OPPORTUNITY
Most Americans do not realize that the katyusha rockets Hizbullah 
fires at Israel are mere pea shooters compared to Israeli weaponry. 
Hizbullah has no heavy artillery, no air force, no tanks. The 
rockets, even when enhanced, do little damage. Even when a Jewish 
occupier's building is hit, only a part of the building is 
demolished. By contrast, Israeli bombing is bringing down entire 
blocks of buildings.
The Hizbullah rocket fire is effective in putting the fear of God 
in the Jews but it is largely not very damaging. Haifa railway 
was a lucky shot. It is noticeable that Iran, whatever funding 
or logistics it might have provided Hizbullah, has failed to 
give significant weaponry to Hizbullah.
This was an opportunity to hit Israel very hard, to make Israel 
realize that war does not pay. The opportunity was missed.
SEGMENT FIVE: ISRAEL's STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
1. Ruin Lebanon's economy. In this the Jews are very cunning. 
They could not bear to see a prosperous Lebanon. The Jews know that 
modern warfare is not about killing a few fighters but about the 
destruction of the country's entire economy. Under Jewish advice, 
Saddam's prosperous Iraq was destroyed. The same is being done in 
Lebanon. When Muslims attack tourist centers to undermine the 
economy of despots who practise torture, rape and murder, it's 
called "terrorism." When Israel does it, "Israel is only 
defending itself."
2. Subdue and neutralize Syria: Israel seems to be succeeding 
here. Syria did not fire a shot in defense of Lebanon for 
SIX STRAIGHT DAYS.
3. Pinpoint IRAN as a threat and prepare America to attack 
IRAN. The Israelis have been whining that their gunboat was struck 
by an Iranian missile and Iranians probably fired the missile. 
[Absolutely no evidence for either claim.] Israel is whining to 
"daddy" that the rockets hitting it have been enhanced by Iran to 
travel deeper into Israel.
[A big moral HOLE in the Jewish mindset here. If America provides 
the latest weaponry to Israel, that's quite okay, but if the 
Iranians help Hizbullah, the WHOLE WORLD MUST UNITE TO STOP it.]
4. Israel's enemies must not be armed. Only Israel should be armed. 
Here the "holocaust" myth comes into play to convince Americans.
CORRECTION: Re: Feds raid Pittsburgh "mosque."
Salaams.
Just to request you to use the word Masjid instead of Mosque in your news.
I thank you for your sending of this email.
Jazaka-allah
[Sis.] Zahera
Jamaat al-Muslimeen News [3 items]
P.O. Box10881
Baltimore, MD 21234
PROTEST ISRAELI AGGRESSION: Greensboro, North Carolina, July 18
Just talked to Ben L after meeting with Badi Ali from the 
Islamic Ctr. He wanted to act ASAP, as the situation is 
changing by the hour.
Go to 5:00-6 PM, July 18 (on the "grassy knoll" corner of 
Eugene and Market - across from the Fed Blg.); we will catch 
5 0'clock traffic. People can be invited to do both the City 
Council thing and the "Protest Israeli Occupation and Agression" 
event. It's a short walk to the spot from the City Council.
W.D. Muhammad: A White Racist Mind in Black Skin?
Muslims who thought that CAIR [the non-Islamic "advocacy" group of 
rich immigrants] was being racist when it tried to dump the Miami 
7 as "non-Muslims" will be surprised to know that the U.S. 
government has another, a bigger fish, infiltrated among the 
Muslims of America.
W.D. Muhammad, who claims to be "imam" and an orthodox Muslim, has 
a track record of ignoring the suffering of Muslims, be it in 
America or overseas. He is known for his friendship with Jews. 
Now he has gone to the extreme of dumping on the government's 
latest victims: the Miami 7, all of African descent, Haitians, 
young, poor, the kind of people W.D. stays away from.
An intelligent man, whose followers worship him, would have asked, 
What evidence does the government have. Instead, he claimed that 
these "terrorists" publicized in the media are the problem. His 
worshipful followers have a way of claiming that he did not say 
what he said. So, here is the quote provided by one of his devotees:
"Q. and A.: Terrorists are a problem for Muslims
Monday, July 10, 2006
By Rene K. Gadoua
Staff writer
When Imam W. Deen Mohammed heard about last month's arrest of six 
men in Florida accused of plotting to blow up Chicago's Sears 
Tower, he thought, "here we go again."
The incident reinforced many people's assumptions that Muslims 
are violent, he said.
"Terrorists in the news give us most of our problems," he said 
Sunday in Syracuse.
"It's the obligation of us not to be quiet and too much to 
ourselves and embrace the American people in the right spirit," 
Mohammed said before speaking at the closing event of the 
conference of the International League of Muslim Women Inc."
Note the funny aspect too. He was invited by an 
"International League...." Ever heard of it?
Ahmed 'Abdel Sattar Denied Family Visits for SIX Months: 
He said: "asalamu alaikum"
Br. Ahmed, as he is known among Muslims, a humble scholar of Qur'an and Hadith, who was paralegal assistant to the blind shaikh, Dr. Omar Abdel Rahman, is in New York's notorious prison/concentration camp, Metropolitan "Correctional" Center.
Recently, the government decided to deny him ALL family visits for SIX months. Why? He had said "asalamu alaikum" to his brother who visited him. The government claims that the "rules" do not allow him to use Arabic. Asalamu Alaikum is Arabic; hence his visits have been stopped!
His wife and children had not been permitted to see him for several months already. Now they have to wait another six months. Sentencing is due in September, and 6 months won't be over by then. There is a chance that Ahmed might be shifted to the American gulag hundreds of miles from his family, probably in "super max" in Colorado, without even being able to say farewell to them.
Is there any justice in this country for Muslims?
AhmedAbdelSattar.org
New Trend's Reporting on War News [5 items]
U.S. WAR CRIMES in IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN
Abeer Al-Janabi and the Case for the Burka
by Nadrat Siddique
A Muslim Woman Feminist
Like the abuses at Abu Ghraib, the rape-murder of fourteen year-old Abeer 
al-Janabi by U.S. soldiers was labeled an aberration, excused under the 
now stale label of "work of a misguided few," by the military and their 
corporate media apologists. The obvious question is: How many "bad apples" 
can there possibly be?
Rumsfeld is the Secretary of Defense. Rumsfeld (and other U.S. military 
leaders) have opined that torture is okay. Rape is one type of torture. 
So, the syllogism holds that rape is okay. Why then is it surprising that 
that U.S. troops, under Rumsfeld's chain of command, might engage in 
rape-murders?
Military atrocities are almost always underreported. I would bet my car 
(one of my few assets) that hundreds if not thousands of similar attacks 
on Iraqi women have occurred. In my view, the attack was not an 
aberration, but wholly congruous with the savage way in which the war has 
targeted Iraqi civilians from start to finish. Time and again, U.S. 
soldiers themselves have attested to attacks on civilians.
Another angle to the perfidy visited on Abeer: Since this was not just a 
random attack, the soldiers had to see her before going after her 
specifically. So, she was not wearing a burka.
Burkas were rare in both Iraq and Afghanistan prior to imperialist 
invasion. In Bagdad under Saddam, next to nobody wore the burka. Now 
burkas are pervasive in Afghanistan, though not as common yet in Iraq.
In light of the U.S.-style liberation of Abeer Al-Janabi, the rants of how 
Islam/burka-wearing oppresses Muslim women ring hollow. Why wouldn't the 
Islamists want the women to wear the burka, given the circumstance of 
occupation by a party which abides by no international law, does not 
recognize the ICC (or any other body which would hold it accountable for 
ANYTHING), and insists on immunity for its troops? What nation in good 
conscience wouldn't want to protect the weakest segment of its population 
against war-time rape, rampant in just about every conflict? To me, what's 
odd is not that the Islamists want the women to wear the burka, but rather 
that many, even in the (Eurocentric) anti-war camp, with which I align 
myself, want Iraqi Muslim women to shed the hijab so they can look more 
like Barbie--never mind the unrestrained dogs running around their 
country.
The occupying power, which—under international law—bears responsibility 
for the welfare of Iraqi women, has shown itself incapable of guaranteeing 
their safety. And Bosnia should have taught women like Abeer not to wait 
around for Muslim men to defend them. Muslim women under occupation would 
do well to wear the burka, as well as to learn self-protection.
AFGHANISTAN
Victorious Taliban Forces Take Daylight Control of Two Towns
On July 17, 2006 elite cadres of the Taliban jihad forces captured 
two towns in Helmand province. The Karzai security forces fled 
after a brief battle in both towns. It appears that now Taliban 
are coming out to openly take over towns after having taken 
control of 75% of the countryside.
A brief geography lesson about these victories: Associated Press 
[and this was picked up by pro-Musharraf Daily Dawn] reported that 
one of the towns, Garmser, is "on the Pakistani border," and the 
other, Naway-i-Barakzay, is a little north of it. Looks like AP does 
not have a map of Afghanistan. The correct name of the first town is 
Garmsel, not Garmser, and it is not "on the Pakistani border" but 
120 miles from the Pakistan border. There are no roads leading 
from the Pakistan border to Germsel.
The second town, Nawayi-i-Barakzoy is about 25 miles north of 
Garmsel, that is about 140 miles north of Pakistan.
Also on July 17, a martyrdom operator entered the "justice ministry" 
building in Lashkargah and killed 10 officials, including the 
Director and Deputy Director of the Justice Ministry. The justice 
ministry is notorious for its torture of prisoners.
Lashkargah, the capital of Helmand province is another 15 miles 
or so north from Nawayi-i-Barakzoy. All three towns are on the 
Helmand river.
KASHMIR:
July 16: The bodies of 4 Kashmiris tortured to death by Indian 
troops searching for "militants" were found by villagers.
In the Sopore area, mujahideen attacked Indian troops of 
the 112 the battalion, BSF, and killed 5 Indian soldiers in a 
grenade attack.
CHECHNIA:
July 10: Russia claims to have killed Basayev, the leader of 
Chechen mujahideen. Basayev has been a thorn in the back of 
the Russian occupation forces for 5 years. Russian propaganda 
accuses him of responsibility for the deaths of school children 
in Beslan. Court reports, however, indicate that the children 
were killed when Russian forces stormed the building. Chechnia 
has been devastated by Russia in massive acts of planned 
genocide, including the murder of tens of thousands of Chechen 
civilians, including women and children, through artillery and 
air bombardments.
Owing to Basayev and others, the Islamic resistance to Russian 
occupation continues.
PAKISTAN:
1. In May 2006, the United States declared that Jamaat ad-Da'wa, 
Pakistan's leading jihad movement working for the freedom of Kashmir, 
is a "terrorist" organization and is hereby declared unlawful. A 
series of interesting events followed.
* The leader of the movement, Hafiz Saeed, ridiculed the U.S. 
declaration in his Friday sermon at a large mosque in Lahore's 
central area known as Chauburgi. The sermon was attended by 
thousands of people. Hafiz Saeed said that Jihad is not terrorism 
and will continue regardless of objections by the U.S.
* Several thousand CHRISTIANS and HINDUS demonstrated in Hyderabad 
[Sindh province] and Islamabad in support of Jamaat ad-da'wa. They 
carried placards praising the good deeds of Jamaat ad-Da'wa during 
floods and hard times. The spokesman of Hindus said that were it 
not for Jamat ad-Da'wa's immediate help, they would have been 
wiped out when severe floods hit Badin, near the border with India.
* Jamat ad-Dawa's workers facilitated the orderly burial of Amer 
Cheema who was martyred by the German police for his defense of 
the honor of the Prophet Muhammad, pbuh. Huge numbers of people 
attended the funeral but it was very orderly owing to the 
discipline provided by the cadres of Jamat ad-Da'wa's youth groups.
* Jamat ad-Da'wa [along with many other groups] organized funeral 
prayers-in-absentia for the Jordanian martyr Abu Musa'ab al-Zarqawi 
who was killed in a U.S. air strike. The biggest of these prayer 
services was led by Hafiz Saeed himself.
Till now General Musharraf has not been able to fulfil America's 
orders declaring this organization "terrorist" and "unlawful." 
The General's failure indicates the balance of power in Pakistan. 
The Islamists cannot remove Musharraf without fighting the army, 
and in turn Musharraf cannot destroy the Islamists because he 
has been isolated from the masses.
2. Allama Turabi Murdered by the Government to Disunite Muslims: 
Syed Munawar Hasan
On July 16, 2006 Syed Munawar Hasan, a top leader of Jamaate Islami 
and organizer of the Islamic coalition, MMA, visited Allama 
Turabi's family in Karachi to condole with them on his murder. 
Hasan was accompanied by many other Islamic leaders, including the 
leader of Karachi's Jamaate Islami.
Syed Munawar Hasan said that the murderers of Allama Turabi are 
sitting in the Governor's House. This murder, he said, like many 
others, has come from the fascist group [MQM] which has been 
imposed on Karachi by General Musharraf.
Allama Turabi wasa symbol of Shia-Sunni unity in the MMA Coalition 
and this murder was aimed at breaking the coalition, he said.
2006-07-18 Tue 20:09:14 cdt
NewTrendMag.org